Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on November 30, 2004
European Heart Journal 2005 26(10):990-995; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi039
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/10/990    most recent
ehi039v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abildstrom, S. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Madsen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abildstrom, S. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Madsen, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2004. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Changes in hospitalization rate and mortality after acute myocardial infarction in Denmark after diagnostic criteria and methods changed

Steen Z. Abildstrom*, Søren Rasmussen and Mette Madsen

National Institute of Public Health, Svanemøllevej 25, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark

Received 4 February 2004; revised 28 September 2004; accepted 1 October 2004; online publish-ahead-of-print 30 November 2004.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +45 3920 7777; fax: +45 3920 8010. E-mail address: sza{at}niph.dk

Aims To analyse the effect of the change in diagnostic criteria for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the use of troponin as a diagnostic marker on the hospitalization rate and mortality of hospitalized AMI patients from 1994 to 2001.

Methods and results Patients (≥30 years) admitted for their first AMI were identified using the National Patient Registry in Denmark. We registered when each hospital introduced troponin as a diagnostic marker. The reported hospitalization rate decreased until 1998 and then increased substantially from 1999 to 2001 from 3472 to 4163 per million inhabitants (19.9%) for men and from 1648 to 2020 per million inhabitants (22.6%) for women. Troponin use was associated with a significant 14% increase in hospitalization rate in this period [rate ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11–1.18]. The effect of troponin was greatest among patients 70 years and older (rate ratio 1.19, 95% CI 1.14–1.23). The 28 day mortality decreased steadily from 25.9% in 1994 to 17.5% in 2002 (32.4%) and was not affected by troponin use.

Conclusion The reported hospitalization rate for AMI increased significantly after the new diagnostic criteria for AMI were introduced. The measurement of cardiac troponins further increased the hospitalization rate. The mortality among hospitalized patients with AMI declined steadily and was not affected by the use of troponins.

Key Words: Acute myocardial infarction • Hospitalization rate • Biochemical markers • Prognosis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JAMAHome page
L. A. Bazzano
Lower Rates of Heart Failure and Death in Acute Coronary Syndromes
JAMA, September 5, 2007; 298(9): 969 - 970.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
G. H. Gislason, J. N. Rasmussen, S. Z. Abildstrom, N. Gadsboll, P. Buch, J. Friberg, S. Rasmussen, L. Kober, S. Stender, M. Madsen, et al.
Long-term compliance with beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and statins after acute myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2006; 27(10): 1153 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.