Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on February 23, 2005
European Heart Journal 2005 26(15):1551-1556; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi151
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/15/1551    most recent
ehi151v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brasselet, C.
Right arrow Articles by Desnos, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brasselet, C.
Right arrow Articles by Desnos, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Skeletal myoblast transplantation through a catheter-based coronary sinus approach: an effective means of improving function of infarcted myocardium

Camille Brasselet1,2,3,4,*, Miguel Cortes Morichetti3, Emmanuel Messas1,3, Claire Carrion5, Alvine Bissery6, Patrick Bruneval7, Jean-Thomas Vilquin5, Antoine Lafont1,4, Albert A. Hagège1,3, Philippe Menasché3,8 and Michel Desnos1,3

1Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Cardiology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou et Faculté de Médecine René Descartes, Université Paris V, Paris, France
2Department of Cardiology, CHU Robert Debré, Avenue du général Koenig, 51092 Reims Cedex, France
3INSERM U 633 and Ecole de Chirurgie de l'Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
4INSERM EMI 0016, Faculté Necker, Paris, France
5INSERM U 582, Institut de Myologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France
6Clinical Investigations Center 9201-INSERM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
7Department of Pathology and INSERM U 430, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou et Faculté de Médecine René Descartes, Université Paris V, Paris, France
8Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou et Faculté de Médecine René Descartes, Université Paris V, Paris, France

Received 27 August 2004; revised 13 December 2004; accepted 23 December 2004; online publish-ahead-of-print 23 February 2005.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +33 3 26 78 70 20; fax: +33 3 26 78 41 32. E-mail address: camille.brasselet{at}wanadoo.fr

Aims This study was designed to assess the functional effects of a transvenous coronary sinus technique of skeletal myoblast delivery in infarcted myocardium.

Methods and results An anterior myocardial infarction was created percutaneously in 14 sheep. Simultaneously, a muscle biopsy was harvested and expanded. Two weeks later, sheep were instrumented percutaneously with a dedicated catheter incorporating an extendable needle for puncture of the venous wall and, under endovascular ultrasound guidance, a microcatheter was advanced through the needle into the target scar for cell delivery. Following the baseline echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular (LV) function, sheep were randomly allocated to receive four-staged in-scar injections of either autologous cells (n=7) or culture medium (n=7). Two months later, LV function was reassessed blindly and hearts were explanted for subsequent histological and immunohistochemical analysis. There were no acute procedural complications. Baseline LV ejection fraction (EF) was significantly lower in transplanted sheep than in controls [38% (35–48) vs. 51% (38–55), respectively, P=0.03; median (range)]. Two months later, LVEF was significantly higher in the transplanted group than in controls [50% (47–56) vs. 39% (36–47), respectively, P=0.002]. Clusters of myoblasts were identified by histology and immunohistochemistry in three of the seven transplanted sheep.

Conclusion These data suggest the functional efficacy of the transvenous coronary sinus technique as a less invasive means of cell delivery to infarcted myocardium.

Key Words: Cell therapy • Skeletal myoblasts • Transplantation • Myocardial infarction • Percutaneous intervention


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. M. Hashemi, S. Ghods, F. D. Kolodgie, K. Parcham-Azad, M. Keane, D. Hamamdzic, R. Young, M. K. Rippy, R. Virmani, H. Litt, et al.
A placebo controlled, dose-ranging, safety study of allogenic mesenchymal stem cells injected by endomyocardial delivery after an acute myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2008; 29(2): 251 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
P. Menasche, M. Desnos, and A. A. Hagege
Myoblast transplantation during cardiac surgery
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2006; 8(suppl_H): H52 - H56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
T. Siminiak, E. Meliga, O. Jerzykowska, and P. W. Serruys
Percutaneous transplantation of skeletal myoblast in the treatment of post-infarction injury
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2006; 8(suppl_H): H57 - H64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. Messas, A. Bel, M. C. Morichetti, C. Carrion, M. D. Handschumacher, S. Peyrard, J. T. Vilquin, M. Desnos, P. Bruneval, A. Carpentier, et al.
Autologous Myoblast Transplantation for Chronic Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 16, 2006; 47(10): 2086 - 2093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.