Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on June 28, 2005
European Heart Journal 2005 26(21):2251-2258; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi383
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/21/2251    most recent
ehi383v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grigorian Shamagian, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lamela, A. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grigorian Shamagian, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lamela, A. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The death rate among hospitalized heart failure patients with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction in the year following discharge: evolution over a 10-year period

Lilian Grigorian Shamagian, Jose Ramon Gonzalez-Juanatey*, Alfonso Varela Roman, Jose Maria Garcia Acuña and Alejandro Virgós Lamela

Servicio de Cardiologia y Unidad Coronaria, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago, Travesia Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Received 3 January 2005; revised 19 May 2005; accepted 26 May 2005; online publish-ahead-of-print 28 June 2005.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +34 981 950757; fax: +34 981 950985. E-mail address: jose.ramon.gonzalez.juanatey{at}sergas.es

Aims To investigate whether changes in clinical characteristics and treatment strategies between 1991 and 2001 have had an impact on the survival of patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure (CHF) and whether those with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF≥50%) differ in this respect from those with depressed LVEF.

Methods and results We studied 1482 patients who had been admitted to the Cardiology Service of a tertiary Spanish hospital in the last 10 years with CHF. Among the 1110 for whom LVEF was evaluated, the prevalence of normal LVEF rose from 37% in the period 1991–96 (Period 1) to 47% in the period 2000–2001 (Period 3). The intensity of both diagnostic and therapeutic measures also increased during this 10-year period. The 1-year survival rate remained virtually unchanged in the whole group of patients, being 82, 84, and 82% in Periods 1, 2 (1997–99), and 3, respectively, even though the prognosis of patients with depressed LVEF (<50%) improved significantly, with 1-year survival rates of 76, 77, and 84% in Periods 1, 2, and 3, respectively; the normal LVEF group had decreasing 1-year survival rates of 88, 86, and 81% in Periods 1, 2, and 3, respectively, although the increased risk of death was not statistically significant.

Conclusion Although in our centre the death rate among hospitalized CHF patients with depressed LVEF during the first year after discharge has tended to fall over the past 10 years, application of current clinical guidelines has led to no such decrease for patients with normal LVEF. This situation points to a need to reconsider the diagnostic and therapeutic strategy to be employed with this latter group of patients.

Key Words: Heart failure • Left ventricular systolic function • Evolution of the prognosis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
D. Banerjee, J. Z. Ma, A. J. Collins, and C. A. Herzog
Long-Term Survival of Incident Hemodialysis Patients Who Are Hospitalized for Congestive Heart Failure, Pulmonary Edema, or Fluid Overload
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 2(6): 1186 - 1190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.