Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on September 23, 2005
European Heart Journal 2006 27(1):29-34; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi503
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/1/29    most recent
ehi503v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Høilund-Carlsen, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Høilund-Carlsen, P. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Potential impact of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy as gatekeeper for invasive examination and treatment in patients with stable angina pectoris: observational study without post-test referral bias

Poul F. Høilund-Carlsen1,*, Allan Johansen1, Henrik Wulff Christensen1, Werner Vach2, Mette Møldrup1, Peter Bartram1, Annegrete Veje1, Torben Haghfelt3 for the Myocardial Ischemia Logistics Evaluation Study (MILES) Group

1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
2Department of Statistics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
3Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Received 11 March 2005; revised 16 July 2005; accepted 1 September 2005; online publish-ahead-of-print 23 September 2005.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +45 65411396; fax: +45 65906192. E-mail address: pfhc{at}ouh.fyns-amt.dk

See page 3 for the editorial comment on this article (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi627)

Aims To evaluate the impact of using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) as gatekeeper for coronary angiography and revascularization in stable angina pectoris.

Methods and results A prospective series of 507 out of 972 adult patients referred to coronary angiography for known or suspected stable angina pectoris underwent clinical examination followed immediately by MPS, the result of which was not communicated. MPS showed normal perfusion in 258/507 (51%) patients, reversible defects in 201/507 (40%), and fixed defects in 48/507 (9%). Of 168 revascularized patients, 27 (16%) had normal perfusion and 13 (8%) had fixed defects. Coronary angiography was undertaken in 476 patients of whom 252 (53%) had normal findings or insignificant stenoses. The same was the case in 361 (41%) out of the 883 of the 972 consecutive patients, who had this examination. Assuming that the true rate of normal perfusion in the entire series was correspondingly lower, 48% of catheterizations and 19% of revascularizations were superfluous.

Conclusion The use of MPS as gatekeeper appears to make about half of catheterizations and almost one-fifth of revascularizations redundant. Even in high-risk groups, substantial savings are possible, and the risk of overlooking patients with severe disease seems negligible.

Key Words: Angina • Catheterization • Coronary disease • Perfusion • Revascularization • Observational study


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: an important step between clinical assessment and coronary angiography in patients with stable chest pain
Eliana Reyes and Stephen Richard Underwood
EHJ 2006 27: 3-4. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
A H Gershlick, M de Belder, J Chambers, D Hackett, R Keal, A Kelion, S Neubauer, D J Pennell, M Rothman, M Signy, et al.
Role of non-invasive imaging in the management of coronary artery disease: an assessment of likely change over the next 10 years. A report from the British Cardiovascular Society Working Group
Heart, April 1, 2007; 93(4): 423 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. J. Bax, B. De Bruyne, A. K. Gitt, S. Kristensen, C. Linde, D. Poldermans, F. J. Pinto, P. Ponikowski, B. D. Prendergast, E. Abagiti-Rosei, et al.
Highlights of the 2006 Scientific Sessions of the European Society of Cardiology: Barcelona, Spain, September 2-5, 2006
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 19, 2006; 48(12): 2564 - 2574.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. F. Hoilund-Carlsen, A. Johansen, W. Vach, and T. Haghfelt
Gatekeeper for coronary angiography: reply
Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2006; 27(9): 1128 - 1129.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. A. Geluk and F. Zijlstra
Gatekeeper for coronary angiography
Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2006; 27(9): 1127 - 1128.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E. Reyes and S. R. Underwood
Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: an important step between clinical assessment and coronary angiography in patients with stable chest pain
Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 3 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.