Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on June 7, 2006
European Heart Journal 2006 27(13):1558-1564; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl067
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/13/1558    most recent
ehl067v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, K. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

International variation in invasive care of the elderly with acute coronary syndromes

Karen P. Alexander1,*, Laura Kristin Newby2, Manju V. Bhapkar2, Harvey D. White3, Judith S. Hochman4, Matthias E. Pfisterer5, David J. Moliterno6, Eric D. Peterson1, Frans Van de Werf7, Paul W. Armstrong8, Robert M. Califf2 for the SYMPHONY and 2nd SYMPHONY Investigators

1 Outcomes Research and Assessment Group, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3411, Durham, NC 27710, USA
2 Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC USA
3 Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
4 New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
5 University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
6 Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
7 Universitaire Zeikenhuizen Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
8 University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Received 30 May 2005; revised 16 March 2006; accepted 9 May 2006; online publish-ahead-of-print 7 June 2006.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +1 919 668 8871; fax: +1 919 668 7057. E-mail address: karen.alexander{at}duke.edu

Aims To explore variations in invasive care of the elderly with acute coronary syndromes across international practice.

Methods and results Using combined populations from the SYMPHONY and 2nd SYMPHONY trials, we describe 30-day cardiac catheterization in elderly (≥75 years; n=1794) vs. younger patients (<75 years; n=14 043) after multivariable adjustment and by region of enrolment. The use of cardiac catheterization and revascularization were not protocol-specified. Elderly patients (median age 78 years) were more often female and more frequently had hypertension, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, and prior coronary bypass surgery. Overall, they underwent less cardiac catheterization than younger patients [53 vs. 63%; adjusted OR 0.53 (0.46, 0.60)]. The absolute rate of cardiac catheterization in the elderly varied from 77% (vs. 91% in younger patients) in the US cohort to 27% (vs. 41% in younger patients) in the non-US cohort. Revascularization of elderly who underwent cardiac catheterization was also higher in US than non-US cohorts (71.3 vs. 53.6%). There was a significant interaction between the patient age and the use of catheterization across US and non-US regions of enrolment, as well as differences in the predictors of catheterization in the elderly. Despite these findings, after adjustment, 90-day rates of death and death or myocardial infarction (MI) were not significantly different in elderly who underwent catheterization compared with those who did not.

Conclusion Although older age is universally predictive of lower use of cardiac catheterization, marked variation in catheterization of the elderly exists across international practice. Demonstrated differences in patterns of use suggest a lack of consensus regarding optimal use of an invasive strategy in the elderly.

Key Words: Acute coronary syndromes • Elderly • Cardiac catheterization • International comparisons


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. P. Faxon
Assessing Appropriateness of Coronary Angiography: Another Step in Improving Quality
Ann Intern Med, August 19, 2008; 149(4): 276 - 278.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. J. Lee, S. Joffe, A. S. Artz, R. E. Champlin, S. M. Davies, M. Jagasia, N. A. Kernan, F. R. Loberiza Jr, R. J. Soiffer, and M. Eapen
Individual Physician Practice Variation in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2008; 26(13): 2162 - 2170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. P. Giugliano and E. Braunwald
The Year in Non ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 2, 2007; 50(14): 1386 - 1395.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.