Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on March 8, 2006
European Heart Journal 2006 27(14):1664-1670; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi796
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/14/1664    most recent
ehi796v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sipahi, I.
Right arrow Articles by Nissen, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sipahi, I.
Right arrow Articles by Nissen, S. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Compensatory enlargement of human coronary arteries during progression of atherosclerosis is unrelated to atheroma burden: serial intravascular ultrasound observations from the REVERSAL trial

Ilke Sipahi1, E. Murat Tuzcu1,*, Paul Schoenhagen1,2, Stephen J. Nicholls1, Volkan Ozduran1, Samir Kapadia1 and Steven E. Nissen1

1 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk F25, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA

Received 8 October 2005; revised 17 December 2005; accepted 26 January 2006; online publish-ahead-of-print 8 March 2006.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +1 216 444 8130; fax: +1 216 445 7723. E-mail address: tuzcue{at}ccf.org

Aims On the basis of the evidence from autopsy studies, it is accepted that compensatory enlargement (remodelling) of coronary arteries during progression of atherosclerosis diminishes once atheroma burden (cross-sectional area stenosis) reaches ~40%. Our aim was to evaluate whether atheroma burden is a limiting factor for coronary arterial remodelling using in vivo serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

Methods and results From the cohort of the Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering (REVERSAL) trial, we identified 210 focal coronary lesions at baseline IVUS. Of these, 128 lesions that had an increase in atheroma area at the 18-month follow-up IVUS were included in the analysis. Lesions were matched at baseline and follow-up. The increase in external elastic membrane (EEM) area for each mm2 increase in atheroma area was not significantly different in lesions with <40 and ≥40% atheroma burden at baseline (1.62 vs. 1.28 mm2, P=0.30). There were no correlations between atheroma burden at baseline and change in EEM (r=0.02, P=0.86) or change in lumen (r=0.04, P=0.64) areas.

Conclusion Assessment of coronary arterial remodelling by serial IVUS revealed that compensatory remodelling is not limited by atheroma burden. Atheroma burden is not a determinant of arterial enlargement during the progression of atherosclerosis.

Key Words: Coronary artery disease • Remodelling • Intravascular ultrasound • Imaging


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
I Sipahi, E M Tuzcu, K-W Moon, S J Nicholls, P Schoenhagen, J Zhitnik, T D Crowe, S Kapadia, and S E Nissen
Do the extent and direction of arterial remodelling predict subsequent progression of coronary atherosclerosis? A serial intravascular ultrasound study
Heart, May 1, 2008; 94(5): 623 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. Sabeti, O. Schlager, M. Exner, W. Mlekusch, J. Amighi, P. Dick, G. Maurer, K. Huber, R. Koppensteiner, O. Wagner, et al.
Progression of Carotid Stenosis Detected by Duplex Ultrasonography Predicts Adverse Outcomes in Cardiovascular High-Risk Patients
Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 2887 - 2894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G. A. Rodriguez-Granillo, S. de Winter, N. Bruining, J. M.R. Ligthart, H. M. Garcia-Garcia, M. Valgimigli, P. J. de Feyter, and on behalf of the EUROPA/PERSPECTIVE Investigators
Effect of perindopril on coronary remodelling: insights from a multicentre, randomized study
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2007; 28(19): 2326 - 2331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Schoenhagen and I. Sipahi
Arterial remodelling: an independent pathophysiological component of atherosclerotic disease progression and regression. Insights from serial pharmacological intervention trials
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2007; 28(19): 2299 - 2300.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
E. Suganuma, V. R. Babaev, M. Motojima, Y. Zuo, N. Ayabe, A. B. Fogo, I. Ichikawa, M. F. Linton, S. Fazio, and V. Kon
Angiotensin Inhibition Decreases Progression of Advanced Atherosclerosis and Stabilizes Established Atherosclerotic Plaques
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2007; 18(8): 2311 - 2319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. G. Brown and X.-Q. Zhao
Is Intravascular Ultrasound the Gold Standard Surrogate for Clinically Relevant Atherosclerosis Progression?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 6, 2007; 49(9): 933 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. W. Klein
Atherosclerosis Regression, Vascular Remodeling, and Plaque Stabilization
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2007; 49(2): 271 - 273.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.