European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on June 16, 2006
European Heart Journal 2006 27(23):2871-2878; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl093
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Substrate modification combined with pulmonary vein isolation improves outcome of catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized comparison
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
Received 31 October 2005; revised 17 May 2006; accepted 26 May 2006; online publish-ahead-of-print 16 June 2006.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 40 428034120; fax: +49 40 428034125. E-mail address: willems{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de
Aims To investigate the effectiveness of additional substrate modification (SM) by left atrial (LA) linear lesions as compared with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in a prospective randomized study. Percutaneous PVI has evolved as an accepted treatment for paroxysmal AF but seemed to be less effective in patients with persistent AF. The benefit of PVI alone and additional linear lesions has not been validated in a randomized study so far.
Methods and results Sixty-two patients with persistent AF (median duration 7, range 118 months) were randomly assigned to either PVI alone (n = 30) or additional SM (n =32) consisting of a roof line connecting both left superior and right superior PV and LA isthmus ablation between left inferior PV and mitral annulus. Procedures including SM were performed using a three-dimensional mapping system (EnSite NavXTM, St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN, USA). Anti-arrhythmic drugs were discontinued within 8 weeks after ablation in both groups. Follow-up included daily trans-telephonic ECG transmitted irrespective of the patient's symptoms. PVI was successful in 98% of all targeted veins in both groups. Additional SM did not increase fluoroscopy time (72.1±18.7 vs. 72.9±17.3 min, P=0.92) because of the use of three-dimensional navigation in the PVI+SM group. AF recurrences within the first 4 weeks following ablation were more common after PVI alone (77%) than additional SM (44%, P=0.002). After a follow-up time of 487 (429570) days, only 20% of patients undergoing stand alone PVI remained in sinus rhythm when compared with 69% following PVI combined with SM (P=0.0001). Two patients assigned to PVI+SM experienced procedure-related complications (cardiac tamponade and minor stroke) which resolved without sequelae.
Conclusion PVI alone is insufficient in the treatment of persistent AF. However, additional left linear lesions increase the success rate significantly. Early AF-relapses are associated with a negative outcome after PVI alone but not following additional SM.
Key Words: Atrial fibrillation Catheter ablation Linear ablation Mapping
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Knecht, M. Hocini, M. Wright, N. Lellouche, M. D. O'Neill, S. Matsuo, I. Nault, V. S. Chauhan, K. J. Makati, M. Bevilacqua, et al. Left atrial linear lesions are required for successful treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation Eur. Heart J., July 8, 2008; (2008) ehn302v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Lutomsky, T. Rostock, A. Koops, D. Steven, K. Mullerleile, H. Servatius, I. Drewitz, D. Ueberschar, T. Plagemann, R. Ventura, et al. Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation improves cardiac function: a prospective study on the impact of atrial fibrillation ablation on left ventricular function assessed by magnetic resonance imaging Europace, May 1, 2008; 10(5): 593 - 599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Steven, T. Rostock, B. Lutomsky, H. Klemm, H. Servatius, I. Drewitz, K. Friedrichs, R. Ventura, T. Meinertz, and S. Willems What is the real atrial fibrillation burden after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation? A prospective rhythm analysis in pacemaker patients with continuous atrial monitoring Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2008; 29(8): 1037 - 1042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Arrantes, F. Gaita, K.-t. Lim, M. Scaglione, P. Jais, M. Hocini, S. Matsuo, S. Knecht, and M. Haissaguerre Atrial fibrillation ablation: evolution of the curative approach Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2007; 9(suppl_I): I129 - I135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Leon The Class I Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Effect? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 25, 2007; 50(13): 1252 - 1253. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. O'Neill, P. Jais, M. Hocini, F. Sacher, G. J. Klein, J. Clementy, and M. Haissaguerre Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, September 25, 2007; 116(13): 1515 - 1523. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Calkins, J. Brugada, D. L. Packer, R. Cappato, S.-A. Chen, H. J.G. Crijns, R. J. Damiano Jr, D. W. Davies, D. E. Haines, M. Haissaguerre, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Personnel, Policy, Procedures and Follow-Up: A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed and Approved by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Europace, June 1, 2007; 9(6): 335 - 379. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




