Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on January 18, 2006
European Heart Journal 2006 27(7):867-874; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi720
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/7/867    most recent
ehi720v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brandt, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brandt, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Comparison of 19 pre-operative risk stratification models in open-heart surgery

Johan Nilsson1,*, Lars Algotsson2, Peter Höglund3, Carsten Lührs1 and Johan Brandt1

1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Lung Centre, Lund University Hospital, SE 221 85 Lund, Sweden
2Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Heart and Lung Centre, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
3Competence Centre for Clinical Research, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

Received 23 August 2005; revised 2 November 2005; accepted 16 December 2005; online publish-ahead-of-print 18 January 2006.

* Corresponding author. Fax: +46 46 15 86 35. E-mail address: johan.nilsson{at}thorax.lu.se

See page 768 for the editorial comment on this article (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi792)

Aims To compare 19 risk score algorithms with regard to their validity to predict 30-day and 1-year mortality after cardiac surgery.

Methods and results Risk factors for patients undergoing heart surgery between 1996 and 2001 at a single centre were prospectively collected. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to describe the performance and accuracy. Survival at 1 year and cause of death were obtained in all cases. The study included 6222 cardiac surgical procedures. Actual mortality was 2.9% at 30 days and 6.1% at 1 year. Discriminatory power for 30-day and 1-year mortality in cardiac surgery was highest for logistic (0.84 and 0.77) and additive (0.84 and 0.77) European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) algorithms, followed by Cleveland Clinic (0.82 and 0.76) and Magovern (0.82 and 0.76) scoring systems. None of the other 15 risk algorithms had a significantly better discriminatory power than these four. In coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-only surgery, EuroSCORE followed by New York State (NYS) and Cleveland Clinic risk score showed the highest discriminatory power for 30-day and 1-year mortality.

Conclusion EuroSCORE, Cleveland Clinic, and Magovern risk algorithms showed superior performance and accuracy in open-heart surgery, and EuroSCORE, NYS, and Cleveland Clinic in CABG-only surgery. Although the models were originally designed to predict early mortality, the 1-year mortality prediction was also reasonably accurate.

Key Words: Mortality • Risk factors • Statistics • Surgery • Survival


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

Importance of risk stratification models in cardiac surgery
Philippe Kolh
EHJ 2006 27: 768-769. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
J. Granton and D. Cheng
Risk Stratification Models for Cardiac Surgery
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2008; 12(3): 167 - 174.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. A. Fox, S. K. Shernan, C. D. Collard, K.-Y. Liu, S. F. Aranki, S. M. DeSantis, P. Jarolim, and S. C. Body
Preoperative B-type natriuretic peptide is as independent predictor of ventricular dysfunction and mortality after primary coronary artery bypass grafting.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 452 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
P. T.L. Chiam and C. E. Ruiz
Percutaneous Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Assessing Results, Judging Outcomes, and Planning Trials: The Interventionalist Perspective
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., August 1, 2008; 1(4): 341 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
V. Aboyans, M. Frank, K. Nubret, P. Lacroix, and M. Laskar
Heart rate and pulse pressure at rest are major prognostic markers of early postoperative complications after coronary bypass surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 33(6): 971 - 976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. van Gameren, A. P. Kappetein, E. W. Steyerberg, A. C. Venema, E. A.J. Berenschot, E. L. Hannan, A. J.J.C. Bogers, and J. J.M. Takkenberg
Do We Need Separate Risk Stratification Models for Hospital Mortality After Heart Valve Surgery?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 921 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. Rao, R. D. L. Stanbridge, J. Chikwe, J. Pepper, P. Skapinakis, O. Aziz, A. Darzi, and T. Athanasiou
Does Previous Percutaneous Coronary Stenting Compromise the Long-Term Efficacy of Subsequent Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery? A Microsimulation Study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): 501 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
O.-P. Kangasniemi, M. A. A. Mahar, E. Rasinaho, A. Satomaa, V. Tiozzo, M. Lepojarvi, and F. Biancari
Impact of estimated glomerular filtration rate on the 15-year outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 33(2): 198 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. A. Grossi, C. F. Schwartz, P.-J. Yu, U. P. Jorde, G. A. Crooke, J. B. Grau, G. H. Ribakove, F. G. Baumann, P. Ursumanno, A. T. Culliford, et al.
High-Risk Aortic Valve Replacement: Are the Outcomes as Bad as Predicted?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 85(1): 102 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
M. A. Albert, N. Halevy, and E. M. Antman
Preoperative Evaluation for Cardiac Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 261 - 280.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. S. Adabag, T. Rector, S. Mithani, J. Harmala, H. B. Ward, R. F. Kelly, J. T. Nguyen, E. O. McFalls, and H. E. Bloomfield
Prognostic Significance of Elevated Cardiac Troponin I After Heart Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5): 1744 - 1750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. T. Mangano, Y. Miao, A. Vuylsteke, I. C. Tudor, R. Juneja, D. Filipescu, A. Hoeft, M. L. Fontes, Z. Hillel, E. Ott, et al.
Mortality Associated With Aprotinin During 5 Years Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
JAMA, February 7, 2007; 297(5): 471 - 479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Mazzoni, R. De Maria, F. Bortone, M. Parolini, R. Ceriani, C. Solinas, V. Arena, and O. Parodi
Long-Term Outcome of Survivors of Prolonged Intensive Care Treatment After Cardiac Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 82(6): 2080 - 2087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
I. J. Ferreira-Gonzalez, A. Ribera, P. Cascant, G. Permanyer-Miralda, and for the ARCA study group
Outcomes in off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting stratified by pre-operative risk profile: an assessment using propensity score
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2006; 27(20): 2473 - 2480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Kolh
Importance of risk stratification models in cardiac surgery
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2006; 27(7): 768 - 769.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.