Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on January 16, 2006
European Heart Journal 2006 27(8):920-928; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi736
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/8/920    most recent
ehi736v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jonas, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jonas, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition as adjunctive treatment during saphenous vein graft stenting: differential effects after randomization to occlusion or filter-based embolic protection

Michael Jonas1, Gregg W. Stone2, Roxana Mehran2, James Hermiller3, Robert Feldman4, Howard C. Herrmann5, David A. Cox6, Richard E. Kuntz1, Jeffrey J. Popma1, Campbell Rogers1,* for the FilterWire EX Randomized Evaluation (FIRE) Investigators

1Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2New York Presbyterian Hospital/Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
3St Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA
4Evanston Hospital, Evanston, IL, USA
5Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
6Mid Carolina Cardiology, Charlotte, NC, USA

Received 7 March 2005; revised 23 November 2005; accepted 22 December 2005; online publish-ahead-of-print 16 January 2006.

* Corresponding author. E-mail address: crogers{at}partners.org

See page 891 for the editorial comment on this article (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi797)

Aims Although embolic protection devices reduce complications during saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenting, adverse events still occur in ~10% of patients. IIb/IIIa antagonists have not been proven effective during SVG intervention. We hypothesized that adjunctive use of these agents might enhance the efficacy of embolic protection devices.

Methods and results In the prospective, multicentre FilterWire EX Randomized Evaluation trial, 651 patients undergoing SVG stenting were randomized to either filter-based FilterWire EX or balloon occlusion/aspiration GuardWire embolic protection devices. IIb/IIIa inhibitor use was at the discretion of the investigator, with randomization stratified by intended use. Patients pre-selected for IIb/IIIa inhibitor use (n=345) had higher baseline risk, with increased 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE, 13.0 vs. 8.0%, P=0.03). GuardWire assigned patients treated with IIb/IIIa inhibitors had higher 30-day MACE compared with those not treated with IIb/IIIa inhibitors (16.0 vs. 6.3%, P=0.007). In contrast, MACE in high-risk FilterWire patients treated with IIb/IIIa inhibitors were similar to their lower risk, untreated counterparts (9.9 vs. 9.5%, P=0.89). Multivariable analysis detected a borderline significant (P=0.056) interaction for lower MACE between FilterWire and IIb/IIIa inhibitor use. Adjustment by the propensity to use IIb/IIIa inhibitors resulted in a significant (P=0.023) interaction for lower MACE rates. IIb/IIIa inhibition in conjunction with FilterWire was associated with less abrupt closure, no reflow, or distal embolization.

Conclusion IIb/IIIa antagonists may improve procedural outcome during SVG stenting in high risk patients, utilizing filter-based embolic protection devices.

Key Words: Saphenous vein graft • Stent • Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists • Embolic protection devices


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

Comeback for glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary interventions for saphenous vein bypass grafts: may be for distal protection with filter-based devices?
Kari O. Niemelä
EHJ 2006 27: 891-892. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. J. Cooper, S. T. Haller, W. Colyer, M. Steffes, M. W. Burket, W. J. Thomas, R. Safian, B. Reddy, P. Brewster, M. A. Ankenbrandt, et al.
Embolic Protection and Platelet Inhibition During Renal Artery Stenting
Circulation, May 27, 2008; 117(21): 2752 - 2760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Coolong, D. S. Baim, R. E. Kuntz, A. J. O'Malley, S. Marulkar, D. E. Cutlip, J. J. Popma, and L. Mauri
Saphenous Vein Graft Stenting and Major Adverse Cardiac Events: A Predictive Model Derived From a Pooled Analysis of 3958 Patients
Circulation, February 12, 2008; 117(6): 790 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. Mauri, C. Rogers, and D. S. Baim
Devices for Distal Protection During Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization
Circulation, June 6, 2006; 113(22): 2651 - 2656.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
K. O. Niemela
Comeback for glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary interventions for saphenous vein bypass grafts: may be for distal protection with filter-based devices?
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2006; 27(8): 891 - 892.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.