European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on June 11, 2007
European Heart Journal 2007 28(13):1566-1573; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm179
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enoxaparin is superior to unfractionated heparin in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing fibrinolysis regardless of the choice of lytic: an ExTRACT-TIMI 25 analysis
1 TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 350 Longwood Avenue, 1st Floor, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2 Heart Institute (InCor), University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
3 Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Pontificia Universidad Catolica, Santiago, Chile
4 Fundacion Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina
5 Coronary Care Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez, Mexico City, Mexico
6 H. Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain
7 Institute of Cardiology, Kiev, Ukraine
8 Enschede, The Netherlands
Received 19 December 2006; revised 7 April 2007; accepted 13 April 2007; online publish-ahead-of-print 11 June 2007.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +1 617 525 6865; fax: +1 888 249 5261; E-mail address: rgiraldez{at}partners.org
Aims: We compared outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients randomized to a strategy of either enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin (UFH) to support fibrinolysis.
Methods and results: In the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study 25 (ExTRACT-TIMI 25) trial, 20 479 patients undergoing fibrinolysis for STEMI with a fibrin-specific agent (N = 16 283) or streptokinase (SK) (N = 4139) were randomized to enoxaparin throughout their hospitalization or UFH for at least 48 h. The primary end point of death or nonfatal recurrent MI through 30 days occurred in 12.0% of patients in the UFH and 9.8% in the enoxaparin groups when treated with fibrin-specific lytics [odds ratioadjusted (ORadj) 0.78; 95% CI 0.700.87; P < 0.001] and 11.8 vs. 10.2%, respectively, when treated with SK (ORadj 0.83; 95% CI 0.661.04; P = 0.10; Pinteraction = 0.58). Major bleeding rates including intracranial hemorrhage within the fibrin-specific cohort were 1.2 and 2.0% in the UFH and enoxaparin groups, respectively (P < 0.001) and 2.0% in UFH and 2.4% in enoxaparin patients in the SK cohort (P = 0.16). Interaction tests between antithrombin- and lytic-type were non-significant (P = 0.20). Death, nonfatal MI, or major bleeding was significantly reduced with enoxaparin in the fibrin-specific cohort (ORadj 0.82; 95% CI 0.740.91; P < 0.001) and favoured enoxaparin in the SK cohort (ORadj 0.89; 95% CI 0.721.10; P = 0.29; Pinteraction = 0.53).
Conclusion: The benefits of an enoxaparin strategy over UFH were observed in both SK and fibrin-specific-treated STEMI patients. Therefore, an enoxaparin strategy is preferred over UFH to support fibrinolysis for STEMI regardless of lytic agent.
Key Words: STEMI Enoxaparin Fibrin-specific lytics Streptokinase
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Asso, Developed in Collaboration With the Canadian Cardi, Endorsed by the American Academy of Family Physici, 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Upda, E. M. Antman, M. Hand, P. W. Armstrong, E. R. Bates, L. A. Green, L. K. Halasyamani, et al. 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 15, 2008; 51(2): 210 - 247. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Antman, M. Hand, P. W. Armstrong, E. R. Bates, L. A. Green, L. K. Halasyamani, J. S. Hochman, H. M. Krumholz, G. A. Lamas, C. J. Mullany, et al. 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: Developed in Collaboration With the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Endorsed by the American Academy of Family Physicians: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Writing on Behalf of the 2004 Writing Committee Circulation, January 15, 2008; 117(2): 296 - 329. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Owen Enoxaparin and ST elevation myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2007; 28(23): 2952 - 2952. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Giraldez and E. M. Antman Enoxaparin and ST-elevation myocardial infarction: reply Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2007; 28(23): 2952 - 2953. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


