Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on June 14, 2007
European Heart Journal 2007 28(14):1731-1738; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm211
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/14/1731    most recent
ehm211v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manegold, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hohnloser, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manegold, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hohnloser, S. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with implanted pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator systems: a randomized comparison of monophasic and biphasic shock energy application

Johannes C. Manegold{dagger}, Carsten W. Israel{dagger}, Joachim R. Ehrlich, Gabor Duray, Dmitri Pajitnev, Florian T. Wegener and Stefan H. Hohnloser*

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, J. W. Goethe University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany

Received 18 January 2007; revised 17 April 2007; accepted 3 May 2007; online publish-ahead-of-print 14 June 2007.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 69 6301 7404; fax: +49 69 6301 7017. E-mail address: hohnloser{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de

See page 1668 for the editorial comment on this article (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm214)

Aims: External cardioversion (ECV) of atrial fibrillation (AF) may damage implanted pacemaker and cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) systems. This prospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ECV comparing mono- to biphasic shock waveforms in patients with implanted rhythm devices.

Methods and results: Patients with pacemaker or ICD systems and an indication for ECV were randomized to receive mono- or biphasic shocks. Systems were tested immediately before and after ECV, 1 h and 1 week later with respect to device and lead integrity. Forty-four patients (71 ± 10 years, 31 male; 29 pacemakers, 12 ICDs, three cardiac resynchronization systems) underwent ECV with antero-posterior paddle orientation (monophasic in 21 and biphasic in 23 patients). Pacing impedances were reduced immediately after ECV (atrial 402–392 ohm, P < 0.001; ventricular 517–496 ohm, P = 0.001) and returned to baseline values within 1 week. Ventricular sensing was reduced immediately after ECV (12.4–11.6 mV, P = 0.004). There was no device or lead dysfunction in any patient. ECV was successful in 42/44 patients (95%), cumulative energy was significantly lower for biphasic compared with monophasic shocks (P = 0.001).

Conclusion: ECV for AF seems to be safe and effective in patients with implanted rhythm devices.

Key Words: Cardioversion • Monophasic shocks • Biphasic shocks • Pacemaker • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator • Atrial fibrillation

{dagger} Both authors contributed equally to this study.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

External cardioversion in patients with implanted cardiac devices: is there a problem?
Michael D. Gammage
EHJ 2007 28: 1668-1669. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Cardioversion in Patients with Pacemakers
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, August 17, 2007; 2007(817): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
M. D. Gammage
External cardioversion in patients with implanted cardiac devices: is there a problem?
Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2007; 28(14): 1668 - 1669.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.