European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on February 15, 2007
European Heart Journal 2007 28(16):1993-2000; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl550
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Ross operation: a Trojan horse?
1 Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Bd 571, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
3 Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Received 6 October 2006; revised 22 December 2006; accepted 25 January 2007; online publish-ahead-of-print 15 February 2007.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +31 10 463 4481; fax: +31 10 463 3993. E-mail address: l.klieverik{at}erasmusmc.nl
Aims: The Ross operation is the operation of choice for children who require aortic valve replacement (AVR) and may also provide a good option in selected adult patients. Although the autograft does not require anticoagulation and has a superior haemodynamic profile, concern regarding autograft and allograft longevity has risen. In this light, we report the 13-year results of our prospective autograft cohort study.
Methods and results: Between 1988 and 2005, 146 consecutive patients underwent AVR with a pulmonary autograft at Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam. Mean age was 22 years (SD 13; range 4 months–52 years), 66% were male. Hospital mortality was 2.7% (N = 4); during follow-up four more patients died. Thirteen-year survival was 94 ± 2%. Over time, 22 patients required autograft reoperation for progressive neo-aortic root dilatation. In addition, eight patients required allograft reoperation. Freedom from autograft reoperation at 13 years was 69 ± 7%. Freedom from allograft reoperation for structural failure at 13 years was 87 ± 5%. Risk factors for autograft reoperation were previous AVR and adult patient age.
Conclusion: Although survival of the Rotterdam autograft cohort is excellent, over time a worrisome increase in reoperation rate is observed. Given the progressive autograft dilatation, careful follow-up of these patients is warranted in the second decade after operation.
Key Words: Ross operation Prospective study Survival Autograft dilatation Reoperation
Presented at the World Congress of Cardiology in Barcelona, Spain, on 4 September 2006.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. M. Dohmen and W. Konertz Is the Ross procedure really a Trojan horse? Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2008; 29(17): 2180 - 2181. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Carrel, M. Schwerzmann, F. Eckstein, T. Aymard, and A. Kadner Preliminary results following reinforcement of the pulmonary autograft to prevent dilatation after the Ross procedure. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 472 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

