European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on September 27, 2007
European Heart Journal 2007 28(22):2706-2713; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm402
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meta-analysis of randomized trials on drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction
1 Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Lazarettstr.36, Munich 80636, Germany
2 Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP–HP) Cochin Hospital, Paris 5 Medical School Rene Descartes University and INSERM U780-Avenir, Paris, France
3 Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
4 San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
5 University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
6 A.O.R.N. S. G. Moscati—Avellino, Italy
7 University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
8 Helsinki University central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
9 St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
Received 28 May 2007; revised 25 July 2007; accepted 23 August 2007; online publish-ahead-of-print 27 September 2007.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 89 12184577; fax: +49 89 12184053. E-mail address: kastrati{at}dhm.mhn.de
See page 2693 for the editorial comment on this article (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm474)
Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Methods and results: We performed a meta-analysis of eight randomized trials comparing drug-eluting stents (sirolimus-eluting or paclitaxel-eluting stents) with bare-metal stents in 2786 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. All patients were followed up for a mean of 12.0–24.2 months. Individual data were available for seven trials with 2476 patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was the need for reintervention (target lesion revascularization). The primary safety endpoint was stent thrombosis. Other outcomes of interest were death and recurrent myocardial infarction. Drug-eluting stents significantly reduced the risk of reintervention, hazard ratio of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.29–0.50), P < 0.001. The overall risk of stent thrombosis: hazard ratio of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.46–1.39), P = 0.43; death: hazard ratio of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.53–1.10), P = 0.14; and recurrent myocardial infarction: hazard ratio of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.48–1.08, P = 0.11) was not significantly different for patients receiving drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents.
Conclusion: The use of drug-eluting stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is safe and improves clinical outcomes by reducing the risk of reintervention compared with bare-metal stents.
Key Words: Acute myocardial infarction Drug-eluting stents Primary angioplasty Restenosis Stents Thrombosis
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in EHJ:
- DES or BMS in acute myocardial infarction?
- Pieter J. Vlaar, Bart J. G. L. de Smet, and Felix Zijlstra
EHJ 2007 28: 2693-2694.[Extract] [Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill The year in interventional cardiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 17, 2008; 51(24): 2355 - 2369. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Shishehbor, R. Amini, L. P.J. Oliveria, I. M. Singh, P. Kelly, D. L. Bhatt, S. R. Kapadia, S. G. Ellis, P. L. Whitlow, and S. J. Brener Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents for Treating ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2008; 1(3): 227 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Rihal Drug-Eluting Stents for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Treatment of Choice or Is Discretion the Better Part of Valor? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2008; 1(3): 233 - 235. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Grines, J. A. Goldstein, and R. D. Safian Should We Routinely Use Drug-Eluting Stents for Acute Myocardial Infarction?: Let's Wait and See J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., April 1, 2008; 1(2): 136 - 138. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Marso Diabetes and Drug-Eluting Stents: What You Get and What You Don't J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., April 1, 2008; 1(2): 148 - 149. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Grines Off-label use of drug-eluting stents putting it in perspective. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 12, 2008; 51(6): 615 - 617. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Bare-Metal or Drug-Eluting Stenting in Acute MI? Journal Watch Cardiology, January 23, 2008; 2008(123): 3 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Vlaar, B. J. G. L. de Smet, and F. Zijlstra DES or BMS in acute myocardial infarction? Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2007; 28(22): 2693 - 2694. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



