Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on September 25, 2007
European Heart Journal 2007 28(22):2803-2817; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm358
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/22/2803    most recent
ehm358v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirchhof, P.
Right arrow Articles by Breithardt, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirchhof, P.
Right arrow Articles by Breithardt, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2007. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Outcome parameters for trials in atrial fibrillation: executive summary

Recommendations from a consensus conference organized by the German Atrial Fibrillation Competence NETwork (AFNET) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

Paulus Kirchhof1,2,*, Angelo Auricchio3, Jeroen Bax4, Harry Crijns5, John Camm6, Hans-Christoph Diener7, Andreas Goette2,8, Gerd Hindricks9, Stefan Hohnloser10, Lukas Kappenberger11, Karl-Heinz Kuck2,12, Gregory Y.H. Lip13, Bertil Olsson14, Thomas Meinertz2,15, Silvia Priori16, Ursula Ravens2,17, Gerhard Steinbeck2,18, Elisabeth Svernhage19, Jan Tijssen20, Alphons Vincent21 and Günter Breithardt1,2

1 Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Straße 33, D-48149 Münster, Germany
2 German Atrial Fibrillation competence NETwork (AFNET), Germany
3 Fondazione Cardiocentro Ticino, Lugano, Switzerland
4 University Hospital Leiden, The Netherlands
5 Department of Cardiology, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands
6 British Heart Foundation Professor, St George's University of London, London, UK
7 Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
8 Department of Cardiology, University of Magdeburg, Germany
9 Department of Cardiology, University of Leipzig, Germany
10 Department of Cardiology, University of Frankfurt/Main, Germany
11 Cardio-Met, Geneva, Switzerland
12 Department of Cardiology, General Hospital St Georg, Hamburg, Germany
13 Haemostasis Thrombosis & Vascular Biology Unit, University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
14 Department of Cardiology/Clinical Sciences, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
15 Department of Cardiology, University of Hamburg, Germany
16 University of Pavia, Italy
17 Department of Pharmacology, Technical University Dresden, Germany
18 Department of Cardiology, Ludwigs-Maximilian University of Munich, Germany
19 Astra Zeneca R&D, Mölndal, Sweden
20 Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
21 Medtronic, Arnhem, The Netherlands

Received 25 April 2007; revised 16 July 2007; accepted 26 July 2007; online publish-ahead-of-print 25 September 2007.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 0251 83 45341; fax: +49 0251 83 45343. E-mail address: kirchhp{at}uni-muenster.de

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common atrial arrhythmia, has a complex aetiology and causes relevant morbidity and mortality due to different mechanisms, including but not limited to stroke, heart failure, and tachy- or bradyarrhythmia. Current therapeutic options (rate control, rhythm control, antithrombotic therapy, ‘upstream therapy’) only prevent a part of this burden of disease. Several new treatment modalities are therefore under evaluation in controlled trials. Given the multifold clinical consequences of AF, trials in AF patients should assess the effect of therapy in each of the main outcome domains. This paper describes an expert consensus of required outcome parameters in seven relevant outcome domains, namely death, stroke, symptoms and quality of life, rhythm, left ventricular function, cost, and emerging outcome parameters. In addition to these ‘requirements’ for outcome assessment in AF trials, further, more detailed outcome parameters are described. In addition to a careful selection of a relevant primary outcome parameter, coverage of outcomes in all major domains of AF-related morbidity and mortality is desirable for any clinical trial in AF.

Key Words: Atrial fibrillation • Controlled trial • Outcome parameter • Therapy, treatment • Randomized trial • End-point • Stroke death • Quality of life • Left ventricular function • Catheter ablation • Antiarrhythmic drugs • Cardioversion • Rate control • Rhythm control • Anticoagulation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
O. Jolobe
It is important to identify the presence of atrial fibrillation more accurately
QJM, June 1, 2008; 101(6): 506 - 507.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.