European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on February 13, 2007
European Heart Journal 2007 28(6):719-725; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl490
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Targeted stent use in clinical practice based on evidence from the BAsel Stent Cost Effectiveness Trial (BASKET)
Division of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, CH 4031, Switzerland
Received 10 October 2006; revised 27 December 2006; accepted 4 January 2007; online publish-ahead-of-print 13 February 2007.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +41 61 265 25 25/52 14; fax: +41 61 265 45 98. E-mail address: pfisterer{at}email.ch
See page 653 for the editorial comment on this article (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl566)
Aim It is unknown which patients benefit most from drug-eluting stents (DES) against bare-metal stents (BMS) in a long-term clinical outcome.
Methods and results To address this question, data from 826 consecutive patients with angioplasty, randomized 2:1 to DES vs. BMS, with an 18-month follow-up for cardiac death/myocardial infarction (MI) and non-MI-related target-vessel revascularization (TVR) were analysed for interactions between stent type and patient/vessel characteristics predicting events. Rates of 18-month TVRs were lower with DES vs. BMS use (7.5 vs. 11.6%, P = 0.05), but similar for both stents regarding cardiac death/MI (DES, 8.4%; BMS, 7.5%; P = 0.70). Significant interactions between stent type and two multivariable event predictors were identified: small stents (<3.0 mm) and bypass graft stenting. In these patient groups together (n = 268, 32%), DES reduced non-MI-related TVR (HR = 0.44; P = 0.02) and cardiac death/MI (HR = 0.44; P = 0.04), whereas in the other 558 patients (68%) TVR rate was similar (HR = 0.75; P = 0.38) and cardiac death/MI rate increased after DES (HR = 2.07; P = 0.05).
Conclusion Patients with angioplasty of small vessels or bypass grafts seem to benefit from DES use, in long-term outcome, in contrast to patients with large native vessel stenting where there might even be late harm. Still, this hypothesis needs to be tested prospectively.
Key Words: Angioplasty Coronary disease Outcome Stents Stent thrombosis
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in EHJ:
- (Active) stents are no panacea, a déjà-vu
- Bernhard Meier
EHJ 2007 28: 653-654.[Extract] [Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Menozzi, E. Solinas, P. Ortolani, A. Repetto, F. Saia, G. Piovaccari, A. Manari, E. Magagnini, L. Vignali, E. Bonizzoni, et al. Twenty-four months clinical outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of small coronary arteries: the long-term SES-SMART clinical study Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2009; 30(17): 2095 - 2101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Effect of length and diameter of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents on late outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, February 1, 2009; 2(1): 35 - 42. |
||||
![]() |
M. Pfisterer, H. P. Brunner-La Rocca, P. Rickenbacher, P. Hunziker, C. Mueller, F. Nietlispach, G. Leibundgut, F. Bader, C. Kaiser, and for the BASKET Investigators Long-term benefit-risk balance of drug-eluting vs. bare-metal stents in daily practice: does stent diameter matter? Three-year follow-up of BASKET Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2009; 30(1): 16 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E Pfisterer Commentary on drug-eluting stents: to use or not to use--that is the question! Heart, December 1, 2008; 94(12): 1648 - 1650. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Saia, A. Marzocchi, and A. Branzi Review: The safety of drug-eluting stents Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, February 1, 2008; 2(1): 43 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Windecker and B. Meier Late Coronary Stent Thrombosis Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): 1952 - 1965. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Agostoni, P. Vermeersch, S. Verheye, P. Van den Heuvel, C. Convens, F. Van den Branden, and G. Van Langenhove Targeted stent use in clinical practice based on evidence from the Basel Stent Cost Effectiveness Trial (BASKET) Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2007; 28(15): 1912 - 1913. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Meier (Active) stents are no panacea, a deja-vu Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2007; 28(6): 653 - 654. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




