Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on January 23, 2007
European Heart Journal 2007 28(8):949-960; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl461
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/8/949    most recent
ehl461v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernández-Avilés, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fernández-Avilés, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Primary angioplasty vs. early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation: the GRACIA-2 non-inferiority, randomized, controlled trial

Francisco Fernández-Avilés1,*, Joaquín J. Alonso2, Gonzalo Peña3, Jesús Blanco4, Juan Alonso-Briales5, Juan López-Mesa6, Felipe Fernández-Vázquez7, José Moreu8, Rosa A. Hernández9, Alfonso Castro-Beiras10, Rafael Gabriel11, C. Michael Gibson12, Pedro L. Sánchez for the GRACIA-2 (Grupo de Análisis de la Cardiopatía Isquémica Aguda) Investigators13

1 Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/ Doctor Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
2 Hospital de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
3 ICICOR, Valladolid, Spain
4 Hospital Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
5 Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga, Spain
6 Hospital Río Carrión, Palencia, Spain
7 Hospital de León, León, Spain
8 Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain
9 Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
10 Hospital Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain
11 Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
12 Cardiovascular Division, Brigham & Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
13 Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain

Received 21 May 2006; revised 13 November 2006; accepted 14 December 2006; online publish-ahead-of-print 22 January 2007.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +34 914265882; fax: +34 915868276. E-mail address: faviles{at}secardiologia.es

See page 915 for the editorial comment on this article (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm045)

Aims: In patients with acute myocardial infarction and ST-segment elevation (STEMI), primary angioplasty is frequently not available or performed beyond the recommended time limit. We designed a non-inferiority, randomized, controlled study to evaluate whether lytic-based early routine angioplasty represents a reasonable reperfusion option for victims of STEMI irrespective of geographic or logistical barriers.

Methods and results: A total of 212 STEMI patients were randomized to full tenecteplase followed by stenting within 3–12 h of randomization (early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty; 104 patients), or to undergo primary stenting with abciximab within 3 h of randomization (primary angioplasty; 108 patients). The primary endpoints were epicardial and myocardial reperfusion, and the extent of left ventricular myocardial damage, determined by means of the infarct size and 6-week left ventricular function. The secondary endpoints were the acute incidence of bleeding and the 6-month composite incidence of death, reinfarction, stroke, or revascularization. Early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty resulted in higher frequency (21 vs. 6%, P = 0.003) of complete epicardial and myocardial reperfusion (TIMI 3 epicardial flow and TIMI 3 myocardial perfusion and resolution of the initial sum of ST-segment elevation ≥ 70%) following angioplasty. Both groups were similar regarding infarct size (area under the curve of CK-MB: 4613 ± 3373 vs. 4649 ± 3632 µg/L/h, P = 0.94); 6-week left ventricular function (ejection fraction: 59.0 ± 11.6 vs. 56.2 ± 13.2%, P = 0.11; endsystolic volume index: 27.2 ± 12.8 vs. 29.7 ± 13.6, P = 0.21); major bleeding (1.9 vs. 2.8%, P = 0.99) and 6-month cumulative incidence of the clinical endpoint (10 vs. 12%, P = 0.57; relative risk: 0.80; 95% confidence interval: 0.37–1.74).

Conclusion: Early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty safely results in better myocardial perfusion than primary angioplasty. Despite its later application, this approach seems to be equivalent to primary angioplasty in limiting infarct size and preserving left ventricular function.

Key Words: Acute myocardial infarction • Fibrinolysis • Primary angioplasty


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

Fibrinolysis may widen the time window for primary angioplasty
Tomasz Siminiak and Dariusz Dudek
EHJ 2007 28: 915-917. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. D. White
Systems of Care: Need for Hub-and-Spoke Systems for Both Primary and Systematic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Fibrinolysis
Circulation, July 15, 2008; 118(3): 219 - 222.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
F. Fernandez-Aviles, P. L. Sanchez, and On behalf of the GRACIA Group (GRupo de Analisis d
Comment on the 'pilot' GRACIA-2 randomized trial: reply
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2007; 28(19): 2418 - 2418.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G. Villata, M. Bollati, A. Gambino, G. Biondi-Zoccai, and I. Sheiban
Comment on the 'pilot' GRACIA-2 randomized trial
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2007; 28(19): 2417 - 2418.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Fibrinolytics Before PCI in Patients with STEMI
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, May 4, 2007; 2007(504): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.