Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on April 2, 2008
European Heart Journal 2008 29(13):1653-1661; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn111
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/13/1653    most recent
ehn111v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saumarez, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Grace, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saumarez, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Grace, A. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Paced ventricular electrogram fractionation predicts sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Richard C. Saumarez1,2,3, Mariusz Pytkowski4, Maciej Sterlinski4, John P. Bourke5, Jonathan R. Clague6, Stuart M. Cobbe7, Derek T. Connelly7, Michael J. Griffith8, Pascal P. McKeown9, Karen McLeod10, John M. Morgan11, Nicolas Sadoul12, Lidia Chojnowska4, Christopher L.-H. Huang13 and Andrew A. Grace1,13,*

1 Department of Cardiology, Papworth Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB23 3RE, UK
2 Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
3 Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
4 National Institute of Cardiology, 04-628 Warsaw, Poland
5 Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle NE7 7DN, UK
6 Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP, UK
7 Department of Medical Cardiology, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK
8 Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
9 Department of Cardiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
10 Department of Cardiology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow G3 8SJ, UK
11 Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
12 Département de Cardiologie, CHU Nancy Brabois, 54500 Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France
13 Division of Cardiovascular Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QW, UK

Received 27 August 2007; revised 29 January 2008; accepted 22 February 2008; online publish-ahead-of-print 2 April 2008.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44 1480 364350, Fax: +44 1480 364799, Email: ag{at}bioc.cam.ac.uk

See page 1600 for the editorial comment on this article (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn238)

Aims: Paced electrogram fractionation analysis (PEFA) has been assessed for the prediction of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in a large-scale, prospective study of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

Methods and results: We determined the positive predictive value (PPV) of PEFA in relation to other risk factors for SCD and outcomes in 179 patients with HCM and no prior history of cardiac arrest. Patients were followed over a mean 4.3 years (range: 1.1–6.3 years). Thirteen patients had SCD-equivalent events: four of these patients died suddenly, three were resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation (VF), and six had implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) discharges in response to VF. PEFA identified nine of these patients and another 14 non-VF patients yielding a censored PPV of between 0.19 and 0.59 that was greater than the PPV that was the formal stopping point of the trial (0.18). Eighty per cent of patients were followed for 4 years or more. The PPV for the identification of SCD in this group was 0.38 (0.17–0.59). The use of two or more conventional markers to predict SCD identified five patients with SCD-equivalent events in the 4-year follow-up group and 42 other patients without events yielding a PPV of 0.106 (confidence limits 0.02–0.15).

Conclusion: PEFA identifies HCM patients at risk of SCD with greater accuracy than non-invasive techniques and may have an important role in determining indications for ICD prescription.

Key Words: Heart arrest • Electrophysiology • Cardiomyopathy • Defibrillation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

Non-invasive risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: don't throw out the baby with the bathwater
Srijita Sen-Chowdhry and William J. McKenna
EHJ 2008 29: 1600-1602. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
G Lin, R A Nishimura, B J Gersh, D Phil, S R Ommen, M J Ackerman, and P A Brady
Device complications and inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Heart, May 1, 2009; 95(9): 709 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A. Grace
Implantable defibrillators in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Heart, May 1, 2009; 95(9): 695 - 696.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
D Ward
Risk assessment in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Heart, March 1, 2009; 95(5): 421 - 421.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
R C Saumarez
Risk assessment in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Heart, March 1, 2009; 95(5): 421 - 421.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P Elliott and P Spirito
The authors' reply
Heart, March 1, 2009; 95(5): 421 - 421.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. Sen-Chowdhry and W. J. McKenna
Non-invasive risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: don't throw out the baby with the bathwater
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2008; 29(13): 1600 - 1602.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.