European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on November 7, 2008
European Heart Journal 2008 29(24):3037-3042; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn485
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience
1 Cardiovascular Center, Raemistrasse 100, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
2 Zurich Center for Integrative Human Physiology (ZIHP), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Received 6 February 2008; revised 19 September 2008; accepted 9 October 2008; online publish-ahead-of-print 7 November 2008.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +41 44 255 4196, Fax: +41 44 255 4414, Email: pak{at}usz.ch
See page 2955 for the editorial comment on this article (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn518)
Aims: To evaluate the accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) using prospective ECG-triggering for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods and results: A total of 30 patients (19 males, 11 females, mean age 58.8 ± 9.9 years) underwent low-dose CTCA and invasive coronary angiography (CA) [median 2 days (0, 41)]. Before CT scanning, intravenous beta-blocker was administered in 18 of 30 patients as heart rate (HR) was >65 b.p.m., achieving a mean HR of 55.7 ± 7.9 b.p.m. CAD was defined as coronary artery narrowing
50%, using CA as standard of reference. The estimated mean effective radiation dose was 2.1 ± 0.7 mSv (range: 1.0–3.3), yielding 96.0% (383/399) of evaluable segments. On an intention-to-diagnose-base, all non-evaluative segments were included in the analysis. Vessels with a non-evaluative segment and no further finding were censored as false positive. Patient-based analysis revealed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100, 83.3, 90.0, and 100%, respectively. The respective values per vessel were 100, 88.9, 85.7, and 100%, respectively.
Conclusion: Prospective ECG-triggering allows low-dose CTCA and provides high diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of CAD in patients with stable sinus rhythm and a low heart rate.
Key Words: CT coronary angiography Diagnostic accuracy Low dose Prospective ECG-triggering Image quality
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in EHJ:
- Non-invasive CT coronary angiography: can high diagnostic image quality be achieved with less radiation exposure?
- Axel Schmermund, Bernd Nowak, and Thomas Voigtländer
EHJ 2008 29: 2955-2956.[Extract] [FREE Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Achenbach, M. Marwan, D. Ropers, T. Schepis, T. Pflederer, K. Anders, A. Kuettner, W. G. Daniel, M. Uder, and M. M. Lell Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition Eur. Heart J., November 5, 2009; (2009) ehp470v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B A Herzog, C A Wyss, L Husmann, O Gaemperli, I Valenta, V Treyer, U Landmesser, and P A Kaufmann First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography Heart, October 15, 2009; 95(20): 1656 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J M van Werkhoven, O Gaemperli, J D Schuijf, J W Jukema, L J Kroft, S Leschka, H Alkadhi, I Valenta, G Pundziute, A de Roos, et al. Multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for risk stratification in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood Heart, October 1, 2009; 95(19): 1607 - 1611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Schoenhagen, E. M. Tuzcu, S. R. Kapadia, M. Y. Desai, and L. G. Svensson Three-dimensional imaging of the aortic valve and aortic root with computed tomography: new standards in an era of transcatheter valve repair/implantation Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2009; 30(17): 2079 - 2086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Pontone, D. Andreini, A. L. Bartorelli, S. Cortinovis, S. Mushtaq, E. Bertella, A. Annoni, A. Formenti, E. Nobili, D. Trabattoni, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography: a comparison between prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram triggering. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2009; 54(4): 346 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. P. Shuman, K. R. Branch, J. M. May, L. M. Mitsumori, J. N. Strote, B. H. Warren, T. J. Dubinsky, D. W. Lockhart, and J. H. Caldwell Whole-Chest 64-MDCT of Emergency Department Patients with Nonspecific Chest Pain: Radiation Dose and Coronary Artery Image Quality with Prospective ECG Triggering Versus Retrospective ECG Gating Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6): 1662 - 1667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. B. Meijboom, M. F.L. Meijs, J. D. Schuijf, M. J. Cramer, N. R. Mollet, C. A.G. van Mieghem, K. Nieman, J. M. van Werkhoven, G. Pundziute, A. C. Weustink, et al. Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 12, 2009; 53(19): 1825 - 1826. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Einstein Radiation Protection of Patients Undergoing Cardiac Computed Tomographic Angiography JAMA, February 4, 2009; 301(5): 545 - 547. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schmermund, B. Nowak, and T. Voigtlander Non-invasive CT coronary angiography: can high diagnostic image quality be achieved with less radiation exposure? Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2008; 29(24): 2955 - 2956. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




