Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on March 4, 2008
European Heart Journal 2008 29(7):871-879; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn078
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/7/871    most recent
ehn078v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Adverse outcomes in fibrinolytic-based facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the ASSENT-4 PCI electrocardiographic substudy

Michael A. McDonald1, Yuling Fu1, Uwe Zeymer2, Galen Wagner3, Shaun G. Goodman4,5, Allan Ross6, Christopher B. Granger3, Frans Van de Werf7, Paul W. Armstrong for the ASSENT-4 PCI Investigators1,*

1 Division of Cardiology, University of Alberta, 251 Medical Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H7
2 Medizinische Klinik B, Ludwigshafen, Germany
3 Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, USA
4 University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
5 Canadian Heart Research Centre, Toronto, Canada
6 George Washington University Medical Center, Washington DC, USA
7 University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium

Received 22 August 2007; revised 8 January 2008; accepted 31 January 2008; online publish-ahead-of-print 4 March 2008.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +1 780 492 0591, Fax: +1 780 492 9486, Email: paul.armstrong{at}ualberta.ca

Aims: Patients in ASSENT-4 PCI undergoing tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) had more adverse events than those undergoing primary PCI. We analysed this to gain further insights.

Methods and results: A total of 549 patients with facilitated PCI and 541 undergoing primary PCI were characterized according to the extent of ST resolution. We also examined the relationship between time from symptom onset, presence of baseline Q waves, and 90 day events. Irrespective of treatment, 90 day mortality was lowest among 186 patients with complete ST resolution at both 60 and 180 min (1.8% facilitated; 0% primary PCI group) and highest in those 502 patients without complete ST resolution at either 60 or 180 min (6.7% facilitated; 5.2% primary PCI group, all P ≤ 0.05). Patients undergoing facilitated PCI presenting >3 h with baseline Q waves also had higher 90 day mortality compared with those without Q waves (10.4 vs. 2.5%, P = 0.056). No significant differences were found within primary PCI patients on the basis of time from symptom onset or presence of initial Q waves.

Conclusion: In this post hoc analysis, our data suggest that a fibrinolysis-facilitated PCI strategy was especially harmful in patients presenting beyond 3 h from symptom onset with established Q waves on their baseline ECG. This may relate to the convergence of later, less effective pre-procedural reperfusion but persisting exposure to the pro-thrombotic and bleeding risks of fibrinolysis.

Key Words: Facilitated PCI • Acute myocardial infarction • Outcomes


This paper was guest edited by Professor Bernard J. Gersh, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.