Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1982 3(2):184-190;
Copyright © 1982 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1982 by The European Society of Cardiology

Multifactorial trial in the prevention of coronary heart disease: 2. Risk factor changes at two and four years

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION EUROPEAN COLLABORATIVE*

World health organization Copenhagen, Denmark

Received 2 November 1981; .

Requests for reprints to: Professor H. Tunstall Pedoe, Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DDl 9SY, Scotland.

Abstract

The interim risk factor changes at two and four years from onset are described in an international controlled trial of multifactorial prevention of coronary heart disease involving 63 732 men aged 40–59 in 44 pairs of factories in Belgium, Italy, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom. These show a net reduction, on average, of most factors which was large enough to be worthwhile if reflected in incidence rates, but less than had been hoped for and not completely consistent or sustained. Cholesterol levels failed to fall in some centres at two years but did so at four as the result of more intensive health education. Self-reported cigarette consumption fell more markedly than did the proportion of smokers. Estimates of the risk of a major coronary event at two years fell by 10% in the intervention group overall and by 14% in men judged to be at high risk and given individual attention, whereas at four years the figures were 14% for the group overall and 24% in high risk men. An equivalent fall in incidence might not be demonstrated in a study even of this size. The value of these changes must be interpreted in the light of future pooled incidence results and in relation to the amount of work involved in the intervention programme which was of moderate intensity and could have been greater with some expansion of money and manpower. Country by country differences in results were partly explainable by local circumstances although most of them were within the limits of sampling error.

Key Words: Coronary heart disease • prevention • risk factors • health education • blood pressure control • cigarette smoking • cholesterol


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
M Laopaiboon
Meta-analyses involving cluster randomization trials: a review of published literature in health care
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, December 1, 2003; 12(6): 515 - 530.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
C. H. Slater, B. Carlton, G. Ramirez, and C. Ashton
Heart Disease: Strategies for Prevention
Eval Health Prof, September 1, 1987; 10(3): 255 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.