Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1982 3(5):469-480;
Copyright © 1982 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ERBEL, R.
Right arrow Articles by EFFERT, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ERBEL, R.
Right arrow Articles by EFFERT, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1982 by The European Society of Cardiology

Comparison of single-plane and biplane volume determination by two-dimensional echocardiography 1. Asymmetric model hearts*

R. ERBEL{dagger},, W. KREBS{dagger}, G. HENN{ddagger}, P. SCHWEIZER{dagger}, H. A. RICHTER§, J. MEYER{dagger} and S. EFFERT{dagger}

{dagger}Department of Internal Medicine I, Rheinisch-Westfalische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Federal Republic of Germany
{ddagger}Department of Statistics and Documentation, Rheinisch-Westfalische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Federal Republic of Germany
§Department of Pathology, Rheinisch-Westfalische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Federal Republic of Germany

Received 31 October 1981; revised 18 December 1981; .

Requests for reprints to: Dr med. Raimund Erbel, Department of Internal Medicine I, Goethestrasse 27/29, D-5100 Aachen, Federal Republic of Germany.

Abstract

In asymmetric model hearts volume was estimated by two-dimensional echocardiography (2-dE) and radiography, and the results compared to directly measured volume in the range from 10 to 320 ml (n = 22). The disc method, and the area-length and ellipsoid methods were used for both single-plane and biplane calculations. When biplane 2-dE measurements were calculated by the disc method and compared with directly measured volumes the regression equation was acceptably linear. For single-plane calculations, no linearity was found. For the disc method, the regression equation was given by y = 0.91x + 8.4, the correlation coefficient (r) was 0.989, and the standard error of estimate (s.e.e.) was ± 12.8 ml. The confidence interval was 0.85 to 0.98. With the area-length method the regression equation was y = 0.93x + 7.4, r = 0.987, s.e.e. = ± 14.0 ml. For the ellipsoid method, the regression equation was y = 0.89x + 1.2, r = 0.966, s.e.e. = ±22.0 ml.

With radiographic biplane calculations compared to directly determined values the regression equation was also found to be linear. For single-plane calculations such linearity was not found. For the disc method the regression equation was y = 0.99x + 5.9, r = 0.991, and s.e.e. = ±12.6 ml. The confidence interval was 0.93 to 1.06. For the area-length method the regression equation was y = 1.01x + 9.0, r = 0.987, s.e.e. = ±15.0 ml, and for the ellipsoid method y = 0.97x – 3.3, r = 0.992, s.e.e. = ±11.2 ml.

Thus, 2-dE is an accurate method for volume determination in asymmetric model hearts using biplane calculations and the disc method. Area-length and ellipsoid methods seemed to be less accurate.

Compared to radiography, 2-dE yielded similar correlation coefficients and s.e.e.s. Whereas 2-dE slightly underestimated model heart volume (–4.5 ± 14.7 ml, NS), radiography overestimated the volume (+5.7 ± 12.3 ml, P<0.05). The mean difference between 2-dE and radiography was 10.2 ± 21.2 ml, P<0.05). These results ought to be taken into account when left ventricular volume determinations are done in patients with coronary artery disease.

Key Words: Two-dimensional echocardiography • ventriculography • volume determination • model hearts • coronary artery disease • left ventricular aneurysm


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
H. Yamada, T. Tabata, S. J. Jaffer, J. K. Drinko, S. E. Jasper, M. S. Lauer, J. D. Thomas, and A. L. Klein
Clinical features of mixed physiology of constriction and restriction: Echocardiographic characteristics and clinical outcome
Eur J Echocardiogr, June 1, 2007; 8(3): 185 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. Reis, M. S. Motta, M. M. Barbosa, W. A. Esteves, S. F. Souza, and E. A. Bocchi
Dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive assessment and risk stratification of patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 4, 2004; 43(3): 393 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Zhuang, Y. Zhang, K. A. Mowrey, J. Li, T. Tabata, D. W. Wallick, Z. B. Popovic, R. A. Grimm, A. Natale, and T. N. Mazgalev
Ventricular Rate Control by Selective Vagal Stimulation Is Superior to Rhythm Regularization by Atrioventricular Nodal Ablation and Pacing During Atrial Fibrillation
Circulation, October 1, 2002; 106(14): 1853 - 1858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. W. Wallick, Y. Zhang, T. Tabata, S. Zhuang, K. A. Mowrey, J. Watanabe, N. L. Greenberg, R. A. Grimm, and T. N. Mazgalev
Selective AV nodal vagal stimulation improves hemodynamics during acute atrial fibrillation in dogs
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2001; 281(4): H1490 - H1497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Berton, T. Citro, R. Palmieri, S. Petucco, S. Renzo De Toni, and P. Palatini
Albumin Excretion Rate Increases During Acute Myocardial Infarction and Strongly Predicts Early Mortality
Circulation, November 18, 1997; 96(10): 3338 - 3345.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.