Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on July 14, 2009
European Heart Journal 2009 30(15):1903-1909; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp254
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/15/1903    most recent
ehp254v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Batty, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Deary, I. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Batty, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Deary, I. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Does IQ explain socio-economic differentials in total and cardiovascular disease mortality? Comparison with the explanatory power of traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors in the Vietnam Experience Study

G. David Batty1,2,3,*, Martin J. Shipley4, Ruth Dundas1, Sally Macintyre1, Geoff Der1, Laust H. Mortensen5,6 and Ian J. Deary2

1 Medical Research Council Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ, UK
2 Department of Psychology, MRC Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
3 The George Institute for International Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
4 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
5 National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, DK
6 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

Received 27 October 2008; revised 10 March 2009; accepted 29 April 2009; online publish-ahead-of-print 14 July 2009.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44 141 357 7520, Fax: +44 141 337 2389, Email: david-b{at}sphsu.mrc.ac.uk

See page 1819 for the editorial comment on this article (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp264)

Aims: The aim of this study was to examine the explanatory power of intelligence (IQ) compared with traditional cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in the relationship of socio-economic disadvantage with total and CVD mortality, that is the extent to which IQ may account for the variance in this well-documented association.

Methods and results: Cohort study of 4289 US male former military personnel with data on four widely used markers of socio-economic position (early adulthood and current income, occupational prestige, and education), IQ test scores (early adulthood and middle-age), a range of nine established CVD risk factors (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total blood cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, body mass index, smoking, blood glucose, resting heart rate, and forced expiratory volume in 1 s), and later mortality. We used the relative index of inequality (RII) to quantify the relation between each index of socio-economic position and mortality. Fifteen years of mortality surveillance gave rise to 237 deaths (62 from CVD and 175 from ‘other’ causes). In age-adjusted analyses, as expected, each of the four indices of socio-economic position was inversely associated with total, CVD, and ‘other’ causes of mortality, such that elevated rates were evident in the most socio-economically disadvantaged men. When IQ in middle-age was introduced to the age-adjusted model, there was marked attenuation in the RII across the socio-economic predictors for total mortality (average 50% attenuation in RII), CVD (55%), and ‘other’ causes of death (49%). When the nine traditional risk factors were added to the age-adjusted model, the comparable reduction in RII was less marked than that seen after IQ adjustment: all-causes (40%), CVD (40%), and ‘other’ mortality (43%). Adding IQ to the latter model resulted in marked, additional explanatory power for all outcomes in comparison to the age-adjusted analyses: all-causes (63%), CVD (63%), and ‘other’ mortality (65%). When we utilized IQ in early adulthood rather than middle-age as an explanatory variable, the attenuating effect on the socio-economic gradient was less pronounced although the same pattern was still present.

Conclusion: In the present analyses of socio-economic gradients in total and CVD mortality, IQ appeared to offer greater explanatory power than that apparent for traditional CVD risk factors.

Key Words: Cardiovascular disease • IQ • Socio-economic status


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

Social inequalities in mortality: a problem of cognitive function?
Michael Marmot and Mika Kivimäki
EHJ 2009 30: 1819-1820. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Marmot and M. Kivimaki
Social inequalities in mortality: a problem of cognitive function?
Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2009; 30(15): 1819 - 1820.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.