European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on August 7, 2009
European Heart Journal 2009 30(22):2749-2757; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp300
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Growth differentiation factor-15 predicts mortality and morbidity after cardiac resynchronization therapy
1 Department of Cardiology, University of Birmingham, Good Hope Hospital, Heart of England NHS Trust, Rectory Road, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands B75 7RR, UK
2 Medtronic Inc., Maastricht, The Netherlands
3 Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
4 Department of Biochemistry, Good Hope Hospital, Heart of England NHS Trust, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, UK
5 Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Received 19 July 2008; revised 2 May 2009; accepted 7 July 2009; online publish-ahead-of-print 7 August 2009.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +44 121 424 2000, Email: cardiologists{at}hotmail.com
Aims: The aim of this study was to determine whether growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) predicts mortality and morbidity after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Growth differentiation factor-15, a transforming growth factor-β-related cytokine which is up-regulated in cardiomyocytes via multiple stress pathways, predicts mortality in patients with heart failure treated pharmacologically.
Methods and results: Growth differentiation factor-15 was measured before and 360 days (median) after implantation in 158 patients with heart failure [age 68 ± 11 years (mean ± SD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 23.1 ± 9.8%, New York Class Association (NYHA) class III (n = 117) or IV (n = 41), and QRS 153.9 ± 28.2 ms] undergoing CRT and followed up for a maximum of 5.4 years for events. In a stepwise Cox proportional hazards model with bootstrapping, adopting log GDF-15, log NT pro-BNP, LVEF, and NYHA class as independent variables, only log GDF-15 [hazard ratio (HR), 3.76; P = 0.0049] and log NT pro-BNP (HR, 2.12; P = 0.0171) remained in the final model. In the latter, the bias-corrected slope was 0.85, the optimism (O) was –0.06, and the c-statistic was 0.74, indicating excellent internal validity. In univariate analyses, log GDF-15 [HR, 5.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.31–11.9; likelihood ratio (LR)
2 = 14.6; P < 0.0001], NT pro-BNP (HR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.55–5.26; LR
2 = 10.4; P = 0.0004), and the combination of both biomarkers (HR, 7.03; 95% CI, 2.91–17.5; LR
2 = 19.1; P < 0.0001) emerged as significant predictors. The biomarker combination was associated with the highest LR
2 for all endpoints.
Conclusion: Pre-implant GDF-15 is a strong predictor of mortality and morbidity after CRT, independent of NT pro-BNP. The predictive value of these analytes is enhanced by combined measurement.
Key Words: Growth differentiation factor-15 Cardiac resynchronization therapy Heart failure Mortality