European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on December 9, 2008
European Heart Journal 2009 30(4):469-477; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn543
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aldosterone blockade and left ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials
1 Division of Cardiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
2 Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Received 18 August 2008; revised 8 November 2008; accepted 18 November 2008; online publish-ahead-of-print 9 December 2008.
* Corresponding author: 2C2 Cardiology, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440-112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2B7. Tel: +1 780 407 8719, Fax: +1 780 407 6452, Email: Justin.ezekowitz{at}ualberta.ca
See page 387 for the editorial comment on this article (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp026)
Context: Aldosterone blockade has been used to treat acute myocardial infarction (MI) and chronic heart failure.
Objective: The aim of this study is to summarize the evidence on the efficacy of spironolactone (SP), eplerenone (EP), or canrenoate (CAN) in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Data sources: A search of multiple electronic databases until June 2008 was supplemented by hand searches of reference lists of included studies and review articles, meeting abstracts, FDA reports, and contact with study authors and drug manufacturers.
Study selection and data extraction: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they included patients with left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction, treatment with SP, EP, or CAN vs. control, and reported clinical outcomes. Nineteen randomized controlled trials (four in acute MI and 15 in heart failure, n = 10 807 patients) were included—14 of SP, three of EP, and three of CAN. Analysis was performed using relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and a random effects model with statistical heterogeneity assessed by I2.
Data synthesis: Aldosterone blockade reduced all-cause mortality by 20% (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74–0.87). All-cause mortality was reduced in both heart failure (RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.67–0.84) and post-MI (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76–0.95) patients. Only nine trials reported hospitalizations, and the RR reduction was 23% (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68–0.87), although 98% of the outcomes came from two trials. Ejection fraction (EF) improved in the seven heart failure trials, which assessed this outcome (weighted mean difference 3.1%, 95% CI 1.6–4.5).
Conclusion: We demonstrated a 20% reduction in all-cause mortality with the use of aldosterone blockade in a clinically heterogeneous group of clinical trial participants with heart failure and post-MI. In addition, we found a 3.1% improvement in EF. Further study in those with less severe symptoms or preserved systolic function is warranted.
Key Words: Heart failure • Spironolactone • Meta-analysis • Systematic review
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in EHJ:
- Aldosterone blockade in patients with heart failure and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction
- Bertram Pitt
EHJ 2009 30: 387-388.[Extract] [Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. M. Albert, C. W. Yancy, L. Liang, X. Zhao, A. F. Hernandez, E. D. Peterson, C. P. Cannon, and G. C. Fonarow Use of Aldosterone Antagonists in Heart Failure JAMA, October 21, 2009; 302(15): 1658 - 1665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Jain, R. C. Campbell, and D. G. Warnock Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blockers and Chronic Kidney Disease Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2009; 4(10): 1685 - 1691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. H. Messerli Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 14, 2009; 54(3): 279 - 280. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Pitt Aldosterone blockade in patients with heart failure and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction Eur. Heart J., February 3, 2009; (2009) ehp026v1. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|