European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on February 7, 2009
European Heart Journal 2009 30(7):797-804; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp011
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pressure–volume loop analysis during implantation of biventricular pacemaker/cardiac resynchronization therapy device to optimize right and left ventricular pacing sites
1 Department of Cardiology, Isala klinieken, Groot Wezenland 20, 8011 JW Zwolle, The Netherlands
2 Departments of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
3 Heart Lung Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Received 30 July 2008; revised 21 October 2008; accepted 24 December 2008; online publish-ahead-of-print 7 February 2009.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +31 38 424 2374, Fax: +31 38 424 3733, Email: v.r.c.derks{at}isala.nl
Aims: To evaluate the clinical utility of pressure–volume loop analyses during pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantations to assess the optimal right ventricular (RV) and/or left ventricular (LV) lead position.
Methods and results: 29 patients with heart failure and chronic RV apical pacing were studied. Stroke work (SW), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), cardiac output (CO), and LV dP/dtmax were assessed using a conductance catheter in the LV during RV apical, RV outflow tract, single-site LV, and biventricular pacing at different left-sided pacing locations. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 34.3 ± 9.8%. Compared with baseline, RV outflow tract pacing showed a small increase of 4.0 ± 6.4% in LV dP/dtmax and no improvement in SW, LVEF, or CO. In the optimal biventricular configuration, SW increased 39 ± 41%, LVEF increased 22 ± 13%, CO increased 16 ± 16%, and LV dP/dtmax increased 10 ± 11% (all P < 0.05). In 45% of the patients, the optimal LV lead position was found at a different location as the first choice' postero-lateral or lateral target vein.
Conclusion: Pressure–volume loop analysis during pacemaker/ICD implantations facilitates to determine the optimal LV pacing site. Patients with chronic RV pacing showed a significant acute improvement in LV function when LV pacing or biventricular pacing is applied.
Key Words: Heart failure Pacing Biventricular pacing Pressure–volume loops
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Bertini, P. P. Sengupta, G. Nucifora, V. Delgado, A. C.T. Ng, N. A. Marsan, M. Shanks, R. R.J. van Bommel, M. J. Schalij, J. Narula, et al. Role of Left Ventricular Twist Mechanics in the Assessment of Cardiac Dyssynchrony in Heart Failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., December 1, 2009; 2(12): 1425 - 1435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
