Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1983 4(6):434-438;
Copyright © 1983 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROSSI, P.
Right arrow Articles by MANCINI, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ROSSI, P.
Right arrow Articles by MANCINI, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1983, by the European Society of Cardiology

A device to select the optimal time to replace the pacemaker activated by a lithium-iodine battery: results of 8 years of experience

P. ROSSI, F. DE BELLIS, M. MINELLA, G. PALMA, A. SOLINAS and P. MANCINI

Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Maggiore Novara, Italy and Electric Heart Stimulation Centre, Policlinico Umberto I, University of Rome Rome, Italy

Received 14 May 1982; revised 24 September 1982; .

Address for reprints: Professor Paolo Rossi, Divisione di Cardiologia, Opedale Maggiore della Carità, 28100 Novara, Italy.

Abstract

The discharge curve of lithium-iodine batteries does not have features which make the clinical decision to replace the pacemaker easy. The output voltage fall corresponding to the end of their life is evidenced by variations of the output variables (frequency and/or length of pulse) and the time of elective replacement time (ER) is arbitrarily established by the manufacturer, ER may be too early or too late in relation to the threshold value of myocardial stimulation. Furthermore, the variables indicating end of life may be changed by troubles in the circuit components, irrespective of the state of battery. A device to detect the optimal time for replacement (OR) of pacemaker was studied in 1692 subjects with implanted LEM VVl electro-stimulators. This device consists of a resistance of 110 ohm connected in series with the catheter through a magnetic switch, which is activated by placing a magnet over the skin. The transient connection of the resistor reduces the output voltage by an amount depending on the resistive load between the electrodes.

In a follow-up of 35 000 months the OR device revealed a very good reliability.

Pacemaker replacement, established when stimulation becomes ineffective during the application of the magnet or when the spike amplitude in the standard oscilloscope rapidly declined, was necessary in 77 patients (six of them were excluded due to a circuit blackout). The OR device was useful in 53 patients (74.6%) with a chronic myocardial threshold of more than 2.5 V, useless in 18 patients with a myocardial threshold lower than 2.5 V; to obviate this limitation a new OR device is described feigning a temporary increment of battery impedance. The employment of the OR device rather than using ER enabled the patients to gain 1333 months of stimulation. The gain of pacing varied from a few months to 3 years, with an average of 18.7 months.

Key Words: Pacemaker replacement • elective replacement time • optimal replacement time


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.