Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1984 5(11):941-947;
Copyright © 1984 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BULLOCK, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by HALL, R. J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BULLOCK, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by HALL, R. J. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1984 The European Society of Cardiology

Precision of digitized M-mode echocardiograms for clinical practice

R. E. BULLOCK, D. APPLETON{dagger}, C. GRIFFITHS*, C. J. ALBERS, H. AMER and R. J. C. HALL

Department of Cardiology, Royal Victoria Infirmary Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP
{dagger}Department of Medical Statistics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne Medical School Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, U.K.
*Regional Medical Physics Department, Freeman Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN

Received 2 July 1984; revised 20 August 1984; .

Address for Correspondence: Dr R. J. C. Hall, Ward 14 Office, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, U.K.

Abstract

Computer digitization of M-Mode echocardiograms has proved a valuable research tool in the study of left ventricular function. It can be applied in clinical practice if the reproducibility of the technique is known so that imprecision can be minimised. Five normal echocardiograms of average clinical quality were selected and four cycles from each echocardiogram were digitized on two occasions by four different digitizers using an ‘Apple II’ computer. The study design allowed the sources of imprecision to be identified by analysis of variance. Assessment of the clinically most useful digitized measurement, peak rate of change of diastolic left ventricular dimension (dD/dt), was imprecise with a large within-subject variance and a 95% confidence interval of ±6.5 cm s–1; too wide for clinical use. The replication component accounted for 90% of this variance, with cycle to cycle and between-digitizer variance components being much less important. This large replication component will be reduced simply by repeating digitization; for dD/dt repeating digitization four times would theoretically reduce the confidence internal to a useful value of ±3.6 cm s–1. The 95% confidence interval for a single digitised measurement of diastolic left ventricular minor dimension was ±0.32 cm, for diastolic posterior wall thickness ±0.23 cm, and for the isovolumic relaxation time (A2–MVO)±27 ms. Replication was again the largest component of variance so that the biggest improvement in precision will come from simply repeating digitization. Digitization on a cheap microcomputer system can provide clinically useful information provided reproducibility and sources of imprecision are known with clinical, as opposed to research, echocardiograms and conditions.

Key Words: Echocardiography-M-mode • precision • digitization • reproducibility


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.