Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1984 5(8):637-648;
Copyright © 1984 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SZATMÁRY, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SZATMÁRY, L. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1984 The European Society of Cardiology

Autonomic blockade and sick sinus syndrome. New concept in the interpretation of electrophysiological and Holter data

L. J. SZATMÁRY

Cardiovascular Surgical Clinic of Semmelweis Medical University Budapest Hungary

Received 24 October 1983; revised 16 February 1984; .

Requests for reprints to: L{acute}szló SZATMÁRY, Cardiovascular Surgical Clinic, Budapest, V{acute}rosmajor 68, 1122-Hungary

Abstract

Autonomic blockade is commonly employed as a test of sinus node dysfunction. We compared primary and secondary atrial postpacing pauses and postextrasystolic sino-atrial responses before and after autonomic blockade in 56 patients with the clinical diagnosis of sick sinus syndrome. Pharmacological autonomic blockade was achieved by atropine 0.04 mg kg–1 and propranolol 0.2 mg kg–1 i.v. In a group of patients with a normal intrinsic heart rate the number of positive electrophysiologic variables associated with sinus node dysfunction declined after autonomic blockade. In 91% of these patients, sinus node function was characterized by a normal intrinsic recovery time, gradual exponential return to the constant sinus cycle length, and biphasic postextrasystolic return responses. Three patients in this group had intrinsic SA-block revealed by atrial pacing and verified by Holter monitoring. Besides normal intrinsic pacemaker properties in 53% of patients, rhythm monitoring revealed severe sinus node dysfunction as manifested by bradycardia and the tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome. SA-block and sinus arrest up to 29120 ms. In the abnormal intrinsic heart rate group, disturbed intrinsic rhythmicity was characterized in all by a prolonged corrected intrinsic recovery time (2320±2740 ms [± SD]), arrhythmia and/or brady-cardia in the secondary postpacing cycles, chaotic postextrasystolic patterns, or prolonged sinoatrial conduction times. Significantly slow minimal heart rates during sleep significantly prolonged average sinus cycle lengths and positive ECGs for sinoatrial disorders in the waking period were present on the 24-rhythm recording.

It is concluded that intrinsic heart rate obtained by autonomic blockade is the best and most simple method for the diagnosis of intrinsic sinus node dysfunction. Combined autonomic blockade and electro-physiological tests can be of great value in unmasking the severity and degree of intrinsic dysfunction and analyzing the abnormality of secondary pacemaker function. These investigations, however, are rather insensitive and therefore ineffective in detecting autonomic sinus node dysfunction. To assess the role and significance of the autonomous neurovegetative tone in the genesis of sinoatrial disorders, rhythm monitoring is required.

Key Words: Autonomic blockade • intrinsic heart rate • secondary cycles • chaotic postextrasystolic responses • Holter data


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.