Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1985 6(8):647-655;
Copyright © 1985 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PFISTERER, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by ZARET, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PFISTERER, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by ZARET, B. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1985 The European Society of Cardiology

Range of normal values for left and right ventricular ejection fraction at rest and during exercise assessed by radionuclide angiocardiography

M. E. PFISTERER*,, A. BATTLER{dagger} and B. L. ZARET{ddagger}

*Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
{dagger}Division of Cardiology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Israel
{ddagger}Section of Cardiology and Nuclear Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, CT, U.S.A.

Received 25 June 1984; revised 2 May 1985; .

Address for reprints. M. Pfisterer, M.D., Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, CH-4O3I Basel, Switzerland,

Abstract

In order to reach a world-wide consensus on the normal range of left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (EF) at rest and during exercise, pooled data of 1200 normal subjects from 28 leading centres in the field of nuclear cardiology (68% of those contacted) was analysed. Weighted mean normal values for LVEF at rest were 62.3±6.1% (1SD) with a lower limit of normal of 50% and for RVEF 52.3±6.2% (N=365) with a lower limit of normal of 40%. During exercise, LVEF increased in 475 subjects by +8.0 EF% (range 3–15%), a normal increase being accepted to be ≥5% over a normal resting value for both LVEF and RVEF. Subgroup analysis of results at rest revealed no significant differences regarding selection of normal subjects (based on normal catheterization findings vs. normal volunteers with low probability of disease), age or sex. During exercise, however, significantly larger increases in LVEF measurements were noted for men versus women (P<0.01), for normal volunteers versus subjects selected as ‘normals’ based on a normal coronary angiogram (P<0.001) and for younger versus older subjects (P<0.001). Data on reproducibility and variability showed that radionuclide angiocardiography can be considered to be a reliable method today. No consensus was found for measurements of regional LV function or wall motion mainly because of differences in methodology used. These normal values may serve as general guidelines for future applications of these techniques but factors which may influence the normal range as defined and discussed in this study should be recognized.

Key Words: Left ventricular function • regional left ventricular function • reproducibility • influence of age and sex on haemodynamics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
T. Kuznetsova, L. Herbots, T. Richart, J. D'hooge, L. Thijs, R. H. Fagard, M.-C. Herregods, and J. A. Staessen
Left ventricular strain and strain rate in a general population
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2008; 29(16): 2014 - 2023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. Larose, P. Ganz, H. G. Reynolds, S. Dorbala, M. F. Di Carli, K. A. Brown, and R. Y. Kwong
Right Ventricular Dysfunction Assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Poor Prognosis Late After Myocardial Infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 27, 2007; 49(8): 855 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
G. King, J. B. Foley, C. F. Royse, K. Yastrebov, M. Hussey, G. Boyle, K. Bennet, J. Cosgrave, P. Crean, and M. Walsh
Myocardial stiffness and the timing difference between tissue Doppler imaging Ea and peak mitral valve opening can distinguish physiological hypertrophy in athletes from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Eur J Echocardiogr, December 1, 2006; 7(6): 423 - 429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Henein, P. Lindqvist, D. Francis, S. Morner, A. Waldenstrom, and E. Kazzam
Tissue Doppler analysis of age-dependency in diastolic ventricular behaviour and filling. A cross-sectional study of healthy hearts (the Umea General Population Heart Study)
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2002; 23(2): 162 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
J. P. Bourke, T. Hawkins, P. Keavey, M. Tynan, S. Jamieson, R. Behulova, and S. S. Furniss
Evolution of ventricular function during permanent pacing from either right ventricular apex or outflow tract following AV-junctional ablation for atrial fibrillation
Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(3): 219 - 228.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
B Wandt, L Bojo, K Tolagen, and B Wranne
Echocardiographic assessment of ejection fraction in left ventricular hypertrophy
Heart, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 192 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.