Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1987 8(3):243-253;
Copyright © 1987 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HANDLER, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by SOWTON, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HANDLER, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by SOWTON, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1987 The European Society of Cardiology

Use of an exercise QRS score and radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction in assessing prognosis after myocardial infarction

C. E. HANDLER, S. V. ELLAM*, M. N. MAISEY{dagger} and E. SOWTON

Departments of Cardiology London SE1 9RT, U.K
*Clinical Physics and Bioengineering London SE1 9RT, U.K
{dagger}Nuclear Medicine, Guy‘s Hospital London SE1 9RT, U.K

Received 29 May 1986; revised 4 August 1986; .

Address for correspondence: Dr Clive E. Handler, Department of Cardiology, Middlesex Hospital, London WIN 8AA, U.K

Abstract

We have compared the prognostic value of a predischarge post-infarction QRS score derived at rest and at submaximal exercise with ejection fraction measured by gated radionuclide left ventriculography in 65 patients. Seventeen patients died or had heart failure (group 1) and 48 were well or had angina (group 2) six months after infarction. The mean QRS score derived from the resting electrocardiogram for group I was significantly greater than that for group 2 (P<0.01) but the QRS scores at peak exercise did not differ significantly between the two groups. The mean ejection fraction for group 2 was significantly greater than that for group 1 (P< 0.001). Both the rest and peak exercise QRS scores correlated weakly but significantly with ejection fraction (P<0.001). The QRS score at rest had a greater sensitivity and specificity in predicting cardiac death and heart failure than the QRS score at peak exercise. A sensitivity of 88% was achieved with a resting ejection fraction less than 50% and a resting QRS score greater than 4. At these values the specificities were 58% and 63% respectively. Combining the blood pressure response to exercise with the QRS score and ejection fraction improved the sensitivity of both with no loss of specificity.

Therefore, the resting QRS score is comparable to eject ion fraction as a predictor of serious cardiac events after infarction and the sensitivity of both may be improved by including an assessment of the blood pressure response to exercise. Because a 12-lead electrocardiogram is cheap and widely available, this QRS score may be used in risk stratification after infarction.

Key Words: Exercise testing • myocardial infarction • QRS score • prognosis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.