Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1988 9(4):365-372;
Copyright © 1988 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by OLSSON, G.
Right arrow Articles by REHNQVIST, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by OLSSON, G.
Right arrow Articles by REHNQVIST, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1988 The European Society of Cardiology

Prognosis after withdrawal of chronic postinfarction metoprolol treatment: a 2–7 year follow-up

G. OLSSON*,, A. ODÉN{dagger}, L. JOHANSSON{ddagger}, A. SJÖGREN* and N. REHNQVIST*

*Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, S-182 88 Danderyd Danderyd, Sweden
{dagger}Department of Mathematics, University of Göteborg S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
{ddagger}Department of Statistics, AB Hässle S-431 83 Mölndal, Sweden

Received 5 March 1987; revised 23 September 1987; .

Reprint requests to: Gunnar Olsson, M.D., Department of Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, S-182 88 Danderyd, Sweden

Abstract

In a randomized double-blind postinfarction study 301 patients were treated with either metoprolol 100 mg b.i.d. (n= 154) or placebo (n= 147) for three years. After the three-year treatment period the study preparation was gradually withdrawn over one week, followed by another 2–7 year follow-up. Mortality and morbidity data were studied both during the intervention period (reported elsewhere) and over the period following withdrawal of study therapy.

During the period following the withdrawal of the trial preparation, there were 16 (14%) and 31 (24%) deaths in the previously placebo and metoprolol groups, respectively (P = 0.10). Corresponding figures for reinfarctions and cerebrovascular events were 15 (13%) vs. 12 (9%) and 14 (12%) vs. 9 (7%) (NS). From a Cox regression analysis taking 13 different variables into account, a model describing the risk for subsequent death was constructed. The model identified the following important variables: sex (relative risk (rr) = 2.4), beta-blocker withdrawal (rr = 2.l), performance on exercise test and digitalis treatment (rr = 2.3, P < 0.05).

The present results, as well as those from other studies, seem to favour continuous postinfarction beta blocker therapy provided that there are no severe side-effects from therapy. Digitalis therapy in postinfarction patients in sinus rhythm may have adverse effects on survival during long-term follow-up.

Key Words: Prognosis • beta-blockade • metoprolol • postinfarction • withdrawal


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardi, F. Van de Werf, D. Ardissino, A. Betriu, D. V. Cokkinos, E. Falk, K. A.A. Fox, D. Julian, M. Lengyel, F.-J. Neumann, et al.
Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation
Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2003; 24(1): 28 - 66.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
A. J. Camm and Y. G. Yap
Clinical Trials of Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Postmyocardial Infarction and Congestive Heart Failure Patients
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2001; 6(1): 99 - 106.
[PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Verstraete, C. R. M. Prentice, M. Samama, and R. Verhaeghe
A European View on the North American Fifth Consensus on Antithrombotic Therapy
Chest, June 1, 2000; 117(6): 1755 - 1770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A D Flapan
Fortnightly Review: Management of patients after their first myocardial infarction
BMJ, October 29, 1994; 309(6962): 1129 - 1134.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.