Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1988 9(8):879-886;
Copyright © 1988 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SPIRITO, P.
Right arrow Articles by MERRILL, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SPIRITO, P.
Right arrow Articles by MERRILL, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1988 The European Society of Cardiology

Reproducibility of Doppler echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular diastolic function

P. SPIRITO, B. J. MARON, I. VERTER and J. S. MERRILL

Echocardiography Laboratory and Cardiology Branch, and the Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, Biostatistics Research Branch National Heart, Lung Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.

Received 18 September 1987; revised 25 January 1988; .

Address correspondence to: Paolo Spirito, M.D., Divisione di Cardiologia, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, Via Volta 8, 16128, Genoa, Italy

Abstract

The present investigation was undertaken in 12 normal subjects to determine the magnitude of technical and biologic variability of six previously validated Doppler indexes of diastolic function. Variability due to the reader was small for each of the six Doppler indexes. Variability due to the technician was larger than for the reader, and day-to-day variability was larger than variability due to either the reader or techinician for the great majority of the comparisions (i.e., 21 of 24). Four Doppler indexes assessing early diastolic events (isovolumic relaxation, duration of the early diastolic peak of flow-velocity, rate of decrease of flow-velocity in early diastole, and maximal early diastolic flow-velocity) did not show statistically significant changes due to day-to-day variability. The two Doppler indexes assessing late diastolic events [maximal late diastolic (atrial) flow-velocity, and the ratio between maximal early and late flow-velocity] showed greater change on a day-to-day basis (P<0.05).

In conclusion, Doppler indexes that represent a measure of isovolumic relaxation and the early filling phases of diastole showed small variability. Indexes that measure the late filling phase of diastole, such as maximal late (atrial) diastolic flow-velocity and the ratio between early and late diastolic flow-velocities, showed relatively large day-to-day variability; therefore, serial changes in the atrial contribution to ventircular filling identified by these indexes should probably be interpreted with some caution.

Key Words: Doppler • diastole • left ventricle • reproducibility.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Barletta, M. L. De Feo, R. Del Bene, C. Lazzeri, S. Vecchiarino, G. La Villa, M. L. Brandi, and F. Franchi
Cardiovascular Effects of Parathyroid Hormone: A Study in Healthy Subjects and Normotensive Patients with Mild Primary Hyperparathyroidism
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2000; 85(5): 1815 - 1821.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
G. Barletta, C. Lazzeri, S. Vecchiarino, R. Del Bene, G. Messeri, A. Dello Sbarba, M. Mannelli, and G. La Villa
Low-Dose C-Type Natriuretic Peptide Does Not Affect Cardiac and Renal Function in Humans
Hypertension, March 1, 1998; 31(3): 802 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
T. Reynolds and M. Halfman-Franey
The Quantification of Cardiac Performance: An Overview of the Debate for the Cardiac Sonographer
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, May 1, 1992; 8(3): 127 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.