Skip Navigation



European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on September 5, 2008

European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn389
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/24/3002    most recent
ehn389v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Luca, G.
Right arrow Articles by Zijlstra, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Luca, G.
Right arrow Articles by Zijlstra, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Adjunctive manual thrombectomy improves myocardial perfusion and mortality in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Giuseppe De Luca1,2,*, Dariusz Dudek3, Gennaro Sardella4, Paolo Marino1, Bernard Chevalier5 and Felix Zijlstra6

1 Division of Cardiology, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Eastern Piedmont University, Novara, Italy
2 Centro di Biotecnologie per la Ricerca Medica Applicata (BRMA), Eastern Piedmont University, Novara, Italy
3 Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
4 Division of Cardiology, Policlinico Umberto I, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
5 Department of Cardiology, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Saint-Denis, France
6 Thorax Center, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Received 28 May 2008; revised 2 July 2008; accepted 14 August 2008.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +39 321 373 3141, Fax: +39 321 373 3407, Email: giuseppe.deluca{at}maggioreosp.novara.it

Aims: The benefits of adjunctive mechanical devices to prevent distal embolization in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are still a matter of debate. Growing interests are on manual thrombectomy devices as compared with other mechanical devices. In fact, they are inexpensive and user-friendly devices, and thus represent an attractive strategy. The aim of the current study was to perform an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials conducted with adjunctive manual thrombectomy devices to prevent distal embolization in AMI.

Methods and results: The literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases [MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/Cochrane_clcentral_articles_ fs.html)] from January 1990 to May 2008, the scientific session abstracts (from January 1990 to May 2008) and oral presentation and/or expert slide presentations (from January 2002 to May 2008) [on transcatheter coronary therapeutics (TCT), AHA (American Heart Association), ESC (European Society of Cardiology), ACC (American College of Cardiology) and EuroPCR websites]. We examined all randomized trials on adjunctive mechanical devices to prevent distal embolization in AMI. The following keywords were used: randomized trial, myocardial infarction, reperfusion, primary angioplasty, rescue angioplasty, thrombectomy, thrombus aspiration, manual thrombectomy, Diver catheter, Pronto catheter, Export catheter, thrombus vacuum aspiration catheter. Information on study design, type of device, inclusion and exclusion criteria, number of patients, and clinical outcome was extracted by two investigators. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. A total of nine trials with 2417 patients were included [1209 patients (50.0%) in the manual thrombectomy device group and 1208 (50%) in the control group]. Adjunctive manual thrombectomy was associated with significantly improved postprocedural TIMI (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) 3 flow (87.1 vs. 81.2%, P < 0.0001), and postprocedural MBG 3 (myocardial blush grade 3) (52.1 vs. 31.7%, P < 0.0001), less distal embolization (7.9 vs. 19.5%, P < 0.0001), and significant benefits in terms of 30-day mortality (1.7 vs. 3.1%, P = 0.04).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that, among patients with AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, the use of adjunctive manual thrombectomy devices is associated with better epicardial and myocardial perfusion, less distal embolization and significant reduction in 30-day mortality. Thus, adjunctive manual thrombectomy devices, if not anatomically contraindicated, should be routinely used among STEMI (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) patients undergoing primary angioplasty.

Key Words: Primary angioplasty • Myocardial infarction • Distal embolization • Manual thrombectomy device


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc IntervHome page
F. Liistro, S. Grotti, P. Angioli, G. Falsini, K. Ducci, S. Baldassarre, A. Sabini, R. Brandini, E. Capati, and L. Bolognese
Impact of Thrombus Aspiration on Myocardial Tissue Reperfusion and Left Ventricular Functional Recovery and Remodeling After Primary Angioplasty
Circ Cardiovasc Interv, October 1, 2009; 2(5): 376 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. G. Steg and G. Ducrocq
Devices to protect against embolization during primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the good, the bad and the ugly
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2008; 29(24): 2953 - 2954.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.