European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on January 21, 2009
European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn553
Late stent malapposition risk is higher after drug-eluting stent compared with bare-metal stent implantation and associates with late stent thrombosis
1 Department of Cardiology C5-P, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
2 Department of Cardiology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
3 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
4 Einthoven Laboratory for Experimental Vascular Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
5 Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
6 Information Specialist Walaeus Library, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Received 13 June 2008; revised 17 September 2008; accepted 19 November 2008.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +31 71 526 6695, Fax: +31 71 526 6885, Email: j.w.jukema{at}lumc.nl
Aims: Late stent malapposition (LSM) may be acquired (LASM) or persistent. LSM may play a role in patients who develop late stent thrombosis (ST). Our objective was to compare the risk of LASM in bare metal stents (BMS) with drug-eluting stents (DES) and to investigate the possible association of both acquired and persistent LSM with (very) late ST.
Methods and results: We searched PubMed and relevant sources from January 2002 to December 2007. Inclusion criteria were: (a) intra-vascular ultrasonography (IVUS) at both post-stent implantation and follow-up; (b) 6–9-month-follow-up IVUS; (c) implantation of either BMS or the following DES: sirolimus, paclitaxel, everolimus, or zotarolimus; and (d) follow-up for LSM. Of 33 articles retrieved for detailed evaluation, 17 met the inclusion criteria. The risk of LASM in patients with DES was four times higher compared with BMS (OR = 4.36, CI 95% 1.74–10.94) in randomized clinical trials. The risk of (very) late ST in patients with LSM (five studies) was higher compared with those without LSM (OR = 6.51, CI 95% 1.34–34.91).
Conclusion: In our meta-analysis, the risk of LASM is strongly increased after DES implantation compared with BMS. Furthermore, LSM seems to be associated with late and very late ST.
Key Words: Meta-analysis Late stent malapposition Late stent thrombosis Drug-eluting stents