Copyright © 2003 by the European Society of Cardiology.
Letter to the Editor
Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (PRAGUE-2 trial)
Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK
* Correspondence to: Dr A. K. Taneja, Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK. Tel: +44 2073518827; Fax: +44 2073518829
E-mail address: a.taneja@rbh.nthames.nhs.uk
Received 11 April 2003; accepted 6 June 2003
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
To the Editor
We read with interest the results of the PRAGUE-2 trial1and its editorial.2Widimsky et al. compared the effects of transport for primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) and immediate thrombolysis (TL) for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), in the randomized trial PRAGUE-2.1The authors concluded that long
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K D Dawkins, T Gershlick, M de Belder, A Chauhan, G Venn, P Schofield, D Smith, J Watkins, H H Gray, and Joint Working Group on Percutaneous Coronary Inter Percutaneous coronary intervention: recommendations for good practice and training Heart, December 1, 2005; 91(suppl_6): vi1 - vi27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
