Copyright © 2003 by the European Society of Cardiology.
Editorial
All that glitters is not gold
a Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
b Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
* Corresponding author
sx151@po.cwrw.edu
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
See doi:10.1016/S1095-668X(02)00427-Xfor the article to which this editorial refers.
Antiarrhythmic drugs as primary therapy for prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients at risk have largely had a disappointing track record.1 This is particularly true for patients with left ventricular dysfunction. And risk stratification that identifies patients most likely to benefit from antiarrhythmic drug therapy is always welcome. So, it is with considerable interest that Brendorp et al.2 offer an analysis of the DIAMOND CHF trial which indicates that patients in the trial whose QTc interval was
429ms appear to have had a therapeutic benefit in a trial
1. Analogies from previous clinical trials
2. Issue of subset analysis
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in EHJ:
- Survival after withdrawal of dofetilide in patients with congestive heart failure and a short baseline QTc interval: A follow-up on the DiamondCHF QT substudy
- B Brendorp, C Torp-Pedersen, H Elming, L Køber, and for the DIAMOND study group
EHJ 2003 24: 274-279.[Abstract] [Full Text]