Copyright © 2003 by the European Society of Cardiology.
Editorial
Who wants his plaque sealed?
University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-117-928-2344; fax: +44-117-925-1643
E-mail address: k.r.karsch@bristol.ac.uk
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
See doi:10.1016/S1095-668X(02)00422-0for the article to which this editorial refers.
There are some lessons to be learned from 25 years of coronary interventional cardiology. One of the most fundamental and important lessons learnt has been the need for an extensive understanding and knowledge of a specific disease process prior to the successful design of a targeted interventional treatment. The rapid development of sophisticated imaging equipment in interventional cardiology has resulted in a much better outcome for patients undergoing percutaneous interventions. The improved understanding of the pathology and pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and restenosis has
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in EHJ:
- Clinical and angiographic outcome of patients with mild coronary lesions treated with balloon angioplasty or coronary stenting: Implications for mechanical plaque sealing
- N Mercado, W Maier, E Boersma, C Bucher, V de Valk, W.W O'Neill, B.J Gersh, B Meier, P.W Serruys, and W Wijns
EHJ 2003 24: 541-551.[Abstract] [Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members, S. Silber, P. Albertsson, F. F. Aviles, P. G. Camici, A. Colombo, C. Hamm, E. Jorgensen, J. Marco, J.-E. Nordrehaug, et al. Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2005; 26(8): 804 - 847. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
