European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on March 21, 2005
European Heart Journal 2005 26(9):851-852; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi214
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The European Society of Cardiology 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Value of community-derived risk models for stratifying patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes
1Dunedin School of Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand
2Green Lane Cardiovascular Service, Auckland City Hospital, Private Bag 92189, Auckland 1030, New Zealand
* Corresponding author. Tel: +64 9 630 992; fax: +64 9 630 9915. E-mail address: harveyw@adhb.govt.nz
This editorial refers to TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-ACS
by P. de Araújo Gonçalves et al., on page 865
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
In their paper, de Araújo Goncalves et al.1 from Portugal compared three risk-stratification algorithmsthe Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score,2 the Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) score,3 and the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score4 in predicting 1-year outcome in 460 consecutive patients aged 63.4±10.8 presenting with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Predictive accuracy of each risk score was fair to good for death or myocardial infarction (MI) at 1-year, which occurred in 15.4% of patients (including 32 deaths and 49 MIs) with the C index ranging from 0.585 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5390.631] with the TIMI score, to 0.630
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in EHJ:
- TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-ACS
- Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves, Jorge Ferreira, Carlos Aguiar, and Ricardo Seabra-Gomes
EHJ 2005 26: 865-872.[Abstract] [FREE Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. T. Yan, R. T. Yan, T. Huynh, A. Casanova, F. E. Raimondo, D. H. Fitchett, A. Langer, S. G. Goodman, and for the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry Understanding Physicians' Risk Stratification of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the Canadian ACS 2 Registry Arch Intern Med, February 23, 2009; 169(4): 372 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C P Gale, S O M Manda, C F Weston, J S Birkhead, P D Batin, and A S Hall Evaluation of risk scores for risk stratification of acute coronary syndromes in the Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP) database Heart, February 1, 2009; 95(3): 221 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Yan, R. T. Yan, M. Tan, A. Casanova, M. Labinaz, K. Sridhar, D. H. Fitchett, A. Langer, and S. G. Goodman Risk scores for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes: useful but simpler is not necessarily better Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2007; 28(9): 1072 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ramsay, M. Podogrodzka, C. McClure, and K.A.A. Fox Risk prediction in patients presenting with suspected cardiac pain: the GRACE and TIMI risk scores versus clinical evaluation QJM, January 1, 2007; 100(1): 11 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



