Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on May 23, 2006
European Heart Journal 2006 27(12):1392-1393; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl048
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/12/1392    most recent
ehl048v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mannaerts, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mannaerts, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Regression of left ventricular mass and wall thickness after cardiac resynchronization therapy: proof of pathophysiological concept

Herman Mannaerts*

Department of Cardiology, Amstelland Hospital, Amstelveen, and VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

* Corresponding author. Tel: +31 204442244; fax: +31 204442446. E-mail address: hermanmannaerts@wanadoo.nl

This editorial refers to ‘Differential change in left ventricular mass and regional wall thickness after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure’{dagger} by Q. Zhang et al., on page 1423

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has become an established therapy for patients with NYHA class 3 and 4 heart failure, with a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) <35%, and a wide QRS complex of >120 ms, especially in patients with a complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB).1 A number of studies have shown that patients with these characteristics may benefit from this therapy in terms of quality-of-life (QoL), exercise capacity, LV function, LV dimensions/volumes, morbidity, and even mortality.1 The key to understanding these effects lies in the term asynchrony as the most important determinant for success of CRT. Asynchrony, which means that parts of the heart and particularly the LV are out of phase during LV contraction and relaxation, can occur at three levels within the . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

Differential change in left ventricular mass and regional wall thickness after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure
Qing Zhang, Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung, Angelo Auricchio, Joseph Yat-Sun Chan, Leo C.C. Kum, Li Wen Wu, and Cheuk-Man Yu
EHJ 2006 27: 1423-1430. [Abstract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
E Liodakis, O A. Sharef, D Dawson, and P Nihoyannopoulos
The use of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for assessing mechanical synchronicity
Heart, November 15, 2009; 95(22): 1865 - 1871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]