Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on June 8, 2006
European Heart Journal 2006 27(13):1511-1512; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl107
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/13/1511    most recent
ehl107v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steg, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Danchin, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steg, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Danchin, N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

WEST: new data on the integration of early thrombolysis and mechanical intervention in the early management of STEMI

Philippe Gabriel Steg1,* and Nicolas Danchin2

1 Centre Hospitalier Bichat-Claude Bernard, 4-rue Henri Huchard, AP-HP, 75018 Paris, France
2 Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris, France

* Corresponding author. Tel: +33 1 40 25 86 69; fax: +33 1 40 25 88 65. E-mail address: gabriel.steg@bch.aphp.fr

This editorial refers to ‘A comparison of pharmacologic therapy with/without timely coronary intervention vs. primary percutaneous intervention early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the WEST (Which Early ST-elevation myocardial infarction Therapy) Study’{dagger} by WEST Steering Committee, on page 1530

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The choice between reperfusion strategies to manage ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction is a topic of immense interest, given the frequency of STEMI, its short-term mortality, and the potential impact on organization of acute cardiac care. There is general agreement that primary PCI, performed in timely fashion in an experienced centre, is an excellent and probably the best strategy.1 However, in many regions of the world, this cannot be implemented. Therefore, intravenous thrombolysis remains the default strategy. Several studies have therefore explored two avenues to improve the results of intravenous thrombolysis: the first is to attempt to provide earlier treatment by using pre-hospital thrombolysis (PHT). In general, PHT is associated with a . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

A comparison of pharmacologic therapy with/without timely coronary intervention vs. primary percutaneous intervention early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the WEST (Which Early ST-elevation myocardial infarction Therapy) study
Paul W. Armstrong and WEST Steering Committee
EHJ 2006 27: 1530-1538. [Abstract] [FREE Full Text]