Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on November 22, 2006
European Heart Journal 2006 27(24):2921-2922; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl396
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/24/2921    most recent
ehl396v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haverkamp, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haverkamp, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Electrical storm: still a cryptogenic phenomenon?

Wilhelm Haverkamp

Department of Cardiology, Charité –, Campus Virchow Clinic, Augstenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany

Corresponding author. Tel: +49 3303 508166; fax: +49 30 450 553 961. E-mail address: wilhelm.haverkamp@charite.de

This editorial refers to ‘Electrical storm in patients with an implantable defibrillator: incidence, features, and preventive therapy: insights from a randomized trial’{dagger} by S.H. Hohnloser et al., on page 3027

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) has become the dominant therapeutic modality for the treatment of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, the ICD does not prevent the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Repeated tachyarrhythmias occurring in a short period of time may therefore result in the delivery of multiple shocks. This phenomenon has been termed ‘electrical storm’ (ES). ES constitutes a medical emergency, which usually results in hospitalization. Occasionally, individual patients may experience more than 50 consecutive shocks. Most patients become anxious and agitated, and psychosocial consequences often outlast the acute event.1 ES may also cause premature ICD battery depletion necessitating generator replacement.

Fortunately, patients experiencing extremely frequent ICD discharges are rare. In order to make it possible to study the mechanisms, predictors, and the prognostic significance of ES, its definition has been broadened. . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

Electrical storm in patients with an implantable defibrillator: incidence, features, and preventive therapy: insights from a randomized trial
Stefan H. Hohnloser, Hussein R. Al-Khalidi, Craig M. Pratt, Jose M. Brum, Daljit S. Tatla, Patrick Tchou, Paul Dorian, and on behalf of the SHock Inhibition Evaluation with AzimiLiDe (SHIELD) Investigators
EHJ 2006 27: 3027-3032. [Abstract] [FREE Full Text]