European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on December 8, 2007
European Heart Journal 2008 29(1):1-3; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm573
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2007. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Interpretation of the electrocardiogram: clinical correlation suggested
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22911, USA
* Corresponding author: Tel: +1 4344651816, Fax: +1 4349242877. Email: wb4z@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
This editorial refers to Local hospital vs. core-laboratory interpretation of the admission electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndromes: increased mortality in patients with unrecognized ST-elevation myocardial infarction by R. Vijayaraghavan et al., on page 31
Footnotes
The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of the European Heart Journal or of the European Society of Cardiology. ![]()
doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm503 ![]()
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Vijayaraghavan et al. have investigated the interpretation of the initial 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, focusing on the patient with potential ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).1 The authors emphasize the importance of accurate ECG interpretation by the acute care physician (i.e. emergency physician, internist, and cardiologist).1
The authors compared the initial interpretation of the initial admission ECG by the treating physician with the interpretation of the same tracing by a physician at the core electrocardiographic laboratory. The ECG interpreters at the site were acute care physicians (emergency physician, internist, and cardiologist); at the core lab, the ECG was interpreted by non-cardiologist physicians using specific definitions of abnormality—in this case, ST segment elevation was defined as >0.1 mV in two
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in EHJ:
- Local hospital vs. core-laboratory interpretation of the admission electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndromes: increased mortality in patients with unrecognized ST-elevation myocardial infarction
- Ram Vijayaraghavan, Andrew T. Yan, Mary Tan, David H. Fitchett, Alina A. Georgescu, Quamrul Hassan, Anatoly Langer, Shaun G. Goodman, and for the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndromes Registry Investigators
EHJ 2008 29: 31-37.[Abstract] [Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Mohlenkamp, N. Lehmann, F. Breuckmann, M. Brocker-Preuss, K. Nassenstein, M. Halle, T. Budde, K. Mann, J. Barkhausen, G. Heusch, et al. Running: the risk of coronary events : Prevalence and prognostic relevance of coronary atherosclerosis in marathon runners Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2008; 29(15): 1903 - 1910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
