European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on April 25, 2008
European Heart Journal 2008 29(11):1339-1341; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn180
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Percutaneous aortic valve implantation. The demise of classical aortic valve replacement?
Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal
* Corresponding author. Tel: +351 239400418, Fax: +351 239829674, Email: antunes.cct.huc@sapo.pt
This editorial refers to ‘Contemporary surgical or percutaneous management of severe aortic stenosis in the elderly’
by F. Descoutures et al., on page 1410
Footnotes
The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of the European Heart Journal or of the European Society of Cardiology.
doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn081 
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The Paris group of Descoutures et al.1 describe their recent experience with percutaneous aortic valve implantation (PAVI). During a 7-month period they were referred 66 elderly patients (>70 years; mean 83 years) for treatment of severe aortic stenosis (AS). Thirty-nine of these (59%) were judged inoperable or ‘high risk’ for surgery. From this subgroup, 12 (31%) were submitted to PAVI and the remaining 27, who were deemed unsuitable for this procedure, were either treated medically (16 patients) or had a catheter balloon dilatation (inappropriately termed valvuloplasty by the authors—seven patients). Perhaps ironically, the last four of these patients, initially deemed inoperable or high risk, were later submitted to classical aortic valve replacement (AVR), because the surgical risk was considered ‘high but not prohibitive’. Two
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in EHJ:
- Contemporary surgical or percutaneous management of severe aortic stenosis in the elderly
- Fleur Descoutures, Dominique Himbert, Laurent Lepage, Bernard Iung, Delphine Détaint, Didier Tchetche, Eric Brochet, Yves Castier, Jean-Pol Depoix, Patrick Nataf, and Alec Vahanian
EHJ 2008 29: 1410-1417.[Abstract] [FREE Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. J. Antunes Editorial comment: Therapeutic decisions for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis Much still to do! Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 35(6): 958 - 959. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Wendt, W. Muller, F. Hauck, M. Thielmann, H. Wendt, B. Kipfmuller, B. Vogel, and H. Jakob In vitro results of a new minimally invasive aortic valve resecting tool Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2009; 35(4): 622 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Khaladj, M. Shrestha, S. Peterss, I. Kutschka, M. Strueber, L. Hoy, A. Haverich, and C. Hagl Isolated surgical aortic valve replacement after previous coronary artery bypass grafting with patent grafts: is this old-fashioned technique obsolete? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2009; 35(2): 260 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|