European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on April 10, 2009
European Heart Journal 2009 30(10):1164-1166; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp155
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Candesartan for cardiovascular prevention in Japanese hypertensive patients with coronary heart disease
1 Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
2 Studies Coordinating Centre, Division of Hypertension and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
3 Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
* Corresponding author. Tel: +31 43 388 2374, Fax: +31 43 388 4128, Email: ja.staessen@epid.unimaas.nl
This editorial refers to Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based vs. non-angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in patients with angiographically documented coronary heart disease and hypertension: the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in Coronary Artery Disease (HIJ-CREATE)
, by H. Kasanuki et al., on page 1203
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
In the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in Coronary Heart Disease (HIJ-CREATE),1 Kasanuki and colleagues randomized hypertensive patients with angiographically proven coronary heart disease either to candesartan or to blood pressure-lowering treatment not based on an angiotensin II type-1 receptor blocker (ARB), but possibly including an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI). The primary endpoint was the incidence of major cardiovascular events, a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, and other cardiovascular events requiring hospitalization. During a median follow-up of 4.2 years, 264 patients of the candesartan group (25.8%) and 288 of the non-ARB group (28.1%) experienced an event. Neither for the composite primary endpoint [hazard ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76–1.06) nor for any of its components did the hazard ratios comparing candesartan with non-ARB treatment approach
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in EHJ:
- Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based vs. non-angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and hypertension: the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in Coronary Artery Disease (HIJ-CREATE)
- Hiroshi Kasanuki, Nobuhisa Hagiwara, Saichi Hosoda, Tetsuya Sumiyoshi, Takashi Honda, Kazuo Haze, Michitaka Nagashima, Jun-ichi Yamaguchi, Hideki Origasa, Mitsuyoshi Urashima, Hiroshi Ogawa, and for the HIJ-CREATE Investigators
EHJ 2009 30: 1203-1212.[Abstract] [Full Text]