Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2002 23(4):268-270; doi:10.1053/euhj.2001.2849
Copyright © 2002 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Bacquer, D.
Right arrow Articles by De Backer, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Bacquer, D.
Right arrow Articles by De Backer, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Editorials

Electrocardiographic findings and global coronary risk assessment

D. De Bacquer and G. De Backer

Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

References

  1. Liao Y, Liu K, Dyer A. Major and minor electrocardiographical abnormalities and risk of death from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular diseases and all causes in men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:1494–1500[Abstract]
  2. Kannel W, Anderson K, McGee D, Degatano L, Stampfer M. Nonspecific electrocardiographical abnormality as a predictor of coronary heart disease: the Framingham heart study. Am Heart J. 1987;113:370–376[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  3. Sigurdsson E, Sigfusson N, Sigvaldason H, Thorgeirsson G. Silent ST-T changes in an epidemiological cohort study a marker of hypertension or coronary heart disease, or both: the Reykjavik study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1140–1147[Abstract]
  4. De Bacquer D, De Backer G, Kornitzer M, Blackburn H. The prognostic value of electrocardiographic findings for total, cardiovascular and coronary heart disease in men and women. Heart. 1998;80:570–577[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Larsen CT, Dahlin J, Blackburn H. Prevalence and prognosis of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy, ST segment depression and negative T-wave. The Copenhagen City Heart Study. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:315–324[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Van Bemmel JH, Kors JA, van Herpen G. Methodology of the modular ECG analysis system MEANS. Methods Inf Med. 1990;29:346–353[ISI][Medline]
  7. Prineas R, Rautaharju P, Grandits G, Crow R. Independent risk for cardiovascular disease predicted by modified continuous score electrocardiographic criteria for 6-year incidence and regression of left ventricular hypertrophy among clinically disease free men: 16-year follow-up for the multiple risk factor intervention trial. J Electrocardiol. 2001;34:91–101[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  8. Dekker J, Schouten E, Klootwijk P, Pool J, Kromhout D. ST segment and T wave characteristics as indicators of coronary heart disease risk: the Zutphen Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1321–1326[Abstract]
  9. Okin P, Devereux R, Kors J. Computerized ST depression analysis improves prediction of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: the Strong Heart Study. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2001;6:107–116[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Daviglus M, Liao Y, Greenland P. Association of nonspecific minor ST-T abnormalities with cardiovascular mortality: Chicago Western Electric Study. JAMA. 1999;281:530–536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Anderson K, Wilson P, Odell P, Kannel W. An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals. Circulation. 1991;83:356–362[Free Full Text]
  12. Wood D, De Backer G, Faergeman O, Graham I, Mancia G, Pyörälä K. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. Recommendations of the Second Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on Coronary Prevention. Eur Heart J. 1998;19:1434–1503[Free Full Text]
  13. Smith S, Greenland P, Grundy S. Beyond secondary prevention: identifying the high-risk patient for primary prevention. Executive Summary. Circulation. 2000;101:111–116[Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
C. Strom Moller, B. Zethelius, J. Sundstrom, and L. Lind
Persistent ischaemic ECG abnormalities on repeated ECG examination have important prognostic value for cardiovascular disease beyond established risk factors: a population-based study in middle-aged men with up to 32 years of follow-up
Heart, September 1, 2007; 93(9): 1104 - 1110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Stern
Electrocardiogram: Still the Cardiologist's Best Friend
Circulation, May 16, 2006; 113(19): e753 - e756.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Bacquer, D.
Right arrow Articles by De Backer, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Bacquer, D.
Right arrow Articles by De Backer, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?