European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on February 7, 2006
European Heart Journal 2006 27(11):1319-1323; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi795
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The prognostic impact of coronary flow-reserve assessed by Doppler echocardiography in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy
1 Cardiology Division, Umberto I° Hospital, Mestre-Venice, Italy
2 Cardiology Division, Cesena Hospital, Cesena, Italy
3 Cardioangiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
4 CNR, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Via. G. Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
5 Cardiology Division, Campo di Marte Hospital, Lucca, Italy
Received 22 September 2005; revised 12 January 2006; accepted 26 January 2006; online publish-ahead-of-print 7 February 2006.
* Corresponding author. Tel/Fax: +39 (0) 50 315 2374. E-mail address: rosas{at}ifc.cnr.it
See page 1266 for the editorial comment on this article (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl011)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aims Coronary flow-reserve (CFR) can be impaired in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), unmasking a coronary microcirculatory dysfunction of potential prognostic impact. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the prognostic value of Doppler echocardiographic-derived CFR in patients with DCM.
Methods and results We evaluated 129 DCM patients (85 male; age 62±11) by transthoracic dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg in 10 min) stress echocardiography. All patients had an ejection fraction <40% (mean 32±7) and angiographically normal coronary arteries with NYHA class
3. CFR was assessed on left anterior descending artery using pulsed Doppler as the ratio of maximal peak vasodilation (dipyridamole) to rest diastolic flow velocity. All patients were followed-up for a median of 22 months. Mean CFR was 2.0±0.5. At individual patient analysis 46 patients had normal (CFR>2.0) and 83 had abnormal CFR. During follow-up, 18 patients died and 33 showed worsening of NYHA class. The worse event-free survival was observed in those patients with an abnormal CFR when compared with those having a normal CFR at high dose of dipyridamole (70 vs. 22%, at 75 months of follow-up, P<0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, severity of mitral insufficiency (HR=1.9, 95% CI=1.062.87), abnormal CFR (HR=4.0, 95% CI=1.115.6), resting wall motion score index (HR=6.9, 95% CI=1.530.7) were independent predictors of survival.
Conclusion In DCM patients, CFR is often impaired. A reduced CFR during vasodilator stress is an independent prognostic marker of bad prognosis.
Key Words: Coronary flow-reserve Transthoracic echocardiography Prognosis Dipyridamole
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a condition that predominantly affects left ventricular (LV) systolic function.1 Nevertheless, echocardiographic parameters at rest are poorly correlated with disease severity and prognosis.2,3 In patients with non-ischaemic DCM, the presence of an inotropic response elicited by pharmacologic stress echocardiography (dipyridamole or dobutamine) identifies a subset of patients at lower risk of death.46 Also coronary flow-reserve (CFR) analysed by PET imaging can be reduced in DCM patients, this reduction being a marker of impaired coronary microcirculation.7 The abnormal CFR in DCM is related to an increased incidence of cardiac mortality, independent of the degree of LV functional impairment and the evidence of overt heart failure.7 Dipyridamole stress echocardiography (DSE) has been demonstrated to be a suitable tool for the assessment of LV wall motion and CFR calculated by pulsed Doppler echocardiography on the territory of the left anterior descending artery (LAD).810 In DCM, Doppler-derived CFR evaluated by pulsed Doppler echocardiography is reduced with inter-individual variability, and is not related to LV inotropic reserve during dipyridamole stress.11 No data are available on the prognostic impact of CFR measured by pulsed Doppler in patients with DCM. Therefore, the primary aim of the present study is to assess the prognostic value of CFR measured by pulsed Doppler echocardiography during high dose of dipyridamole in patients with DCM in a multicentre study. The secondary aim is to assess whether this value was additive over simple variables of recognized prognostic value which may be derived from a baseline echocardiogram, such as resting wall motion or diastolic dysfunction.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients
From 1 May 1997 to 31 December 2004, 137 patients were prospectively enrolled from the Cardiology Division, Mestre (n=52) and Cesena (n=44), the Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Council of Research (n=28), and Federico II, University of Naples (n=13). The study population consisted of patients with idiopathic DCM presenting with: (i) a global LV dysfunction (ejection fraction <40% by biplane area length method on resting echocardiogram) but no history of ischaemic heart disease and angiographically normal coronary arteries (coronary angiography performed prior to study enrolment); (ii) transthoracic echocardiogram adequate to assess resting regional wall function (the echocardiogram was considered adequate if
13 of the maximum 16 segments were visualized in at least one projection); (iii) enrolment in a follow-up program. Exclusion criteria were: (i) technically poor acoustic window precluding satisfactory imaging of left ventricle (for two-dimensional echo) or of LAD coronary artery flow Doppler (for CFR assessment); (ii) haemodynamic instability or NYHA class IV; (iii) documentation of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation), (iv) significant co-morbidity reducing life expectancy to <1 year; and (v) unwillingness to give informed consent. All patients with congenital, valvular, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, pericarditis, and thyroid disease were also excluded. Given these inclusion/exclusion criteria, the population represented a consecutive cohort of patients presenting at each institution. Of the 137 patients initially selected for the study, eight patients were subsequently excludedthree patients were excluded for inadequate echocardiographic image quality during stress precluding satisfactory imaging of LAD flow (n=2) or inadequate wall motion analysis (n=1). Five further patients were lost to follow-up of which two had a CFR<2 and three had a CFR>2. Thus, 129 patients (87 males, mean age 62±11 years) represent the final study group. The study was approved by the institutional review board. All patients gave their written informed consent when they underwent stress echocardiography. When patients signed the written informed consent they also authorized physicians to use their clinical data according to the Italian Law. Stress echo data were collected and analysed by stress echocardiographers not involved in patient care. All patients were followed-up for a median of 22 months (1st quartile 9.8, 3rd quartile 38), with a minimum pre-defined follow-up time of 6 months.
Resting and stress echocardiography
Transthoracic stress echocardiographic studies were performed with commercially available ultrasound machine (Sonos 5500-7500 Philips Ultrasound, Andover, Mass, Sequoia C256 Acuson Siemens Mountain View, CA, USA and Vivid System 7, GE/Vingmed, Milwaukee, WI, USA) equipped with 2.53.5 MHz phased-array sector scan probe (S3S8 or V3V7) and with second harmonic technology. All standard echocardiographic views were obtained when possible. LV end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters were measured from the M-mode trace obtained by parasternal long axis view. LV volumes were measured and ejection fraction obtained by two-dimensional and four-chamber view using biplane area-length method, according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography.12 LV mass was calculated by the Devereux formula13 indexed to body surface area. Mitral regurgitation was assessed semi-quantitatively (from 1 to 4) by colour flow Doppler. LV diastolic function was evaluated by recording mitral inflow pattern at the tips level and calculating E/A ratio and deceleration time (DT) of E velocity. On the basis of the Doppler measurements, two principal mitral flow velocity patterns were defined: (i) a likewise restrictive pattern, characterized by an E/A ratio >1.52 and a DT
150 ms; and (ii) a likewise non-restrictive pattern, characterized by an E/A <1 (whatever the value of the DT) or if >1 with a DT>150 ms.14
Two-dimensional echocardiography and 12-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring were performed in combination with high dose of dipyridamole (up to 0.84 mg over 10 min) in accordance to well-established protocol.15 During the procedure, blood pressure and ECG were recorded each minute. The LV was divided into 16 segments as suggested by the American Society of Echocardiography.15 Segmental wall motion was graded as follows: normal, 1; hypokinetic, 2; akinetic, 3; and dyskinetic, 4. Wall Motion Score Index (WMSI) was derived by dividing the sum of individual visualized segment scores by the number of visualized segments.15
CFR was performed during the standard stress echo examination by a semi-simultaneous imaging of both wall motion and LAD flow.8 CFR was assessed using a broad-band high-frequency (512 MHz) transthoracic transducer (S12) or 3.57.0 MHz with second harmonic capability (S8). Coronary flow in the mid-distal portion of LAD was searched in the low parasternal long-axis cross-section under the guidance of colour Doppler flow mapping.16 If no colour-coded blood flow from the LAD was visualized at the baseline condition, the procedure was attempted a second time during contrast enhancement with Sonovue (Bracco-Byk-Gulden, Konstanz, Germany) in bolus (0.5 mL intravenously) in 33 patients (27% of the total population).
All studies were digitally stored to simplify off-line reviewing and measurements. Coronary flow parameters were analysed off-line using the built-in calculation package of the ultrasound unit. Flow velocities were measured at least twice for each study: at baseline and at peak stress (before aminophylline injection). At each time point, three optimal profiles of peak diastolic Doppler flow velocities were measured, and the results were averaged. Coronary blood flow velocity reserve was defined as the ratio between hyperaemic and basal peak diastolic coronary flow. CFR was considered normal when it was >2. All observers were trained by the same senior investigators (FR), who granted consistency in data acquisition storage and interpretation. The previously assessed intra- and inter-observer variability for measurements of Doppler recordings were <10%.17
Follow-up data
Follow-up data were obtained from at least one of four sources: review of the patient's hospital record, personal communication with the patient's physician and review of the patient's chart, a telephone interview with the patient conducted by trained personnel, a staff physician visiting the patients at regular intervals in the out-patient clinic. According to the study protocol, follow-up information were obtained every 6 months. By inclusion criteria, follow-up data were obtained in all patients. Events were defined as death for all causes, cardiac death, development or progression of heart failure. In patients who died in hospital or at home, the cause of death was elucidated from the medical record, the family and the local physician who signed the death certificate. The definition of cardiac death required documentation of significant arrhythmias or cardiac arrest, or both, or death attributable to congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction in the absence of any other precipitating factors. In case of deaths out of hospital for which no autopsy was performed, sudden unexpected death was attributed to a cardiac cause. The development or progression of heart failure was defined as at least one of the following: worsening of functional class to NYHA class III and IV, new hospitalization for heart failure, or heart transplantation. Therefore, the outcome events were all cause-death (defined as cardiac and non-cardiac death) for survival, and spontaneous events (death and the development or progression of heart failure for spontaneous event-free survival). When more than one of these events occurred, the patient was censored at the time of the most severe event.
Statistical analysis
Values are expressed as mean±SD. The sample size has been determined on the basis of the individual contribution of covariates to the model, as assessed from the significance test given with each coefficient in the main output. We used for power a value of 80%, while 5% was the choice for alpha.18
The individual effect of certain variables on event-free survival was evaluated with the use of the Cox regression model. The individual effect of certain variable on event-free survival was evaluated using the Cox regression model (SPSS statistical software, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA and Splus 6.1). Univariate analysis was undertaken by assessing the weight of each single variable by itself. Afterwards, all the significant variables were entered in the model all together without employing a stepwise approach, hence to adjust for several risk factors, multivariable Cox analysis was performed with all the variables found to be significant at the univariable analysis entering in a single step. The proportional hazards assumptions of Cox model was verified with the linear correlation test.19 A significance of 0.05 was required for a variable to be included into the multivariable model, while 0.1 was the cut-off value for exclusion. Hazard ratios (HR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated.
The following covariates were analysed: age, sex, hypertension, smoking habit, diabetes, alcohol consumption, left bundle branch block, presence of medical therapy at time of testing, different class of drugs at time of testing (ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers, digitalis, amiodarone), mitral insufficiency severity, LV end-diastolic volume, LV end-diastolic diameter, ejection fraction, LV mass index, restrictive pattern, resting WMSI, CFR on the LAD artery. Differences between survival curves were compared with the log-rank test. Proportions were compared by
2 statistic; a Fisher's exact test was used when appropriate.
Comparison of the baseline characteristics between the groups (with normal vs. abnormal CFR) was performed with an independent sample t-test. KaplanMeier life table estimates of spontaneously occurring event-free survival was used to summarize the follow-up experience in these patients and to clarify presentation. Differences in survival rates between groups were tested by the log-rank test. All tests were two-sided and a P-value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The main clinical and echocardiographic data are reported in Table 1.
|
Stress echocardiographic findings
Mean CFR value was 2.0±0.5. At individual patient analysis, 46 patients had normal CFR (>2.0) and 83 had abnormal CFR. Patients with an abnormal CFR had a higher WMSI at rest when compared with those having a normal CFR (2.1±0.2 vs. 1.9±0.3, P=0.001). Resting ejection fraction was 32±7 and increased to 39±10 at peak dipyridamole dose (P<0.001).
Follow-up data: spontaneous events
During a median follow-up of 22 months (1st quartile, 9.8; 3rd quartile, 38), a total of 51 (39%) events (18 deaths of which 16 were attributed to cardiac causes and 33 development or progression of heart failure) occurred. The distribution of events in relation to the presence/absence of normal CFR is reported in Table 2. The worse outcome was observed in those patients with an abnormal CFR when compared with those having a normal CFR (70 vs. 22%, at 75 months of follow-up, P<0.001) (Figure 1).
|
|
Univariate predictors of spontaneous events are reported in Table 3. In the multivariable analysis, severity of mitral insufficiency (HR=1.9, 95% CI=1.062.87), abnormal CFR (HR=4.0, 95% CI=1.115.6), resting WMSI (HR=6.9, 95% CI=1.530.7) were independent predictors of survival.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In patients with DCM, an abnormal CFR detectable by Doppler echocardiography identifies a subset of patients at higher risk of spontaneous events (death and worsening of clinical status): the lower the CFR, the higher the incidence rate of spontaneous events.
Comparison with previous studies
The independent value of pulsed Doppler-derived CFR during dipyridamole stress echocardiography was already demonstrated in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.20 In a series of 327 patients with a negative high-dose dipyridamole stress echo, Rigo et al. showed that the presence of an abnormal CFR was related to a worse outcome.20 CFR is reduced in most patients with non-ischaemic DCM.11,2124 It has already been demonstrated that the severity of this impairment is correlated with the clinical and/or haemodynamic severity of non-ischaemic DCM.11 In fact, higher NYHA functional class, lower EF, higher LV volumes, and restrictive filling pattern are associated with a reduced CFR.11 From the prognostic viewpoint, a normal CFR in non-ischaemic DCM identifies a subset of patients with a favourable outcome, although the data with this very demanding technique are limited. Neglia et al.7 demonstrated that an abnormal CFR assessed by PET imaging is related to a 3-fold increase in the relative risk of death and/or development or progression of heart failure. Our data confirm and expand previous studies, suggesting that CFR has a prognostic value when it is abnormally reduced in patients with idiopathic DCM.
Pathophysiologic mechanisms
Different mechanisms can be responsible for the CFR impairment in this set of patients: LV hypertrophy, increased LV end-diastolic pressure, and coronary small vessel disease. None of these factors can fully explain the impairment of CFR but all of them can be involved in the development of CFR reduction. Microvascular disease has been demonstrated to be present in non-ischaemic DCM2527 at a very early stage21,28 and it might represent the triggering event leading to CFR impairment, which in its turn is responsible for the unfavourable clinical outcome. These results support the hypothesis that chronic myocardial hypoperfusion or repetitive myocardial ischaemia attributable to abnormal coronary microcirculatory flow could exert a detrimental role in the evolution of idiopathic LV dysfunction towards overt DCM. Cecchi et al.29 hypothesized that coronary microvascular dysfunction may represent a common pathway leading to a disease progression in different cardiomyopathies, including conditions such as aortic valve stenosis and hypertensive heart disease.
Study limitations
In the present study, we employed a high dose of dipyridamole to obtain a maximal vasodilation. Although the experience in CFR detection is wider with adenosine (140 µg/kg/min), high-dose dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg) has been shown to exert a similar vasodilating effect.30 In this study, there was no central reading. Rest echocardiography and CFR measurement were interpreted in the peripheral centres and entered directly in the data bank. This system allowed substantial sparing of human and technologic resources but it was also the logical pre-requisite for a large-scale study, designed to represent the realistic performance of the test rather than the results of a single labor even a single personworking in a highly dedicated echo laboratory. Because the assessment of the echocardiograms was qualitative and subjective, variability in reading the echocardiograms might have modulated the results of individual centres,31 especially for some parameters, such as mitral insufficiency, which can be assessed with accuracy only with quantitative, relatively elaborated assessment.32 However, all our readers in individual centres had a long lasting experience in echocardiography, passed the quality control in stress echo reading as previously described,33 had extensive experience on execution and interpretation of CFR also through joint reading sessions. Data on resting and stress echo were directly entered in the data bank at the time of test execution. It is however, obvious that a core reading laboratory should have granted a higher robustness of echocardiographic measurements. By potentially limiting the impact of CFR index in the present study, this methodology provides however, some clinical implications on the role of this index in assessing prognosis in busy echo labs, thus allowing generalizability to the routine clinical setting.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In patients with idiopathic DCM, the prognostic role of impaired microvascular CFR has been shown to be unfavourable. The presence of an abnormal CFR during dipyridamole infusion allows the non-invasive identification of a subgroup of patients with LV dysfunction at high risk of developing progressive ventricular deterioration and heart failure.34 It is in this group of patients that an aggressive treatment is warranted. In contrast to other non-invasive tools as PET, very expensive and associated with radiation exposure, transthoracic Doppler-derived CFR is equally non-invasive but less expensive and more accessible.35
Conflict of interest: none declared.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- Dec WG and Fuster V. (1994) Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 331:15641575.
[Free Full Text] - Tan LB. (1986) Cardiac pumping capability and prognosis in heart failure. Lancet 2:13601363.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Kubo M, Yokota Y, Takarada A, Kumaki T, Seo T, Maehashi N, Toh S, Hayakawa M, Inoh T, Fukuzaki H. (1985) Regional left ventricular function in dilated cardiomyopathy: observation of regional left ventricular wall motion before and during dobutamine administration. J Cardiogr 15:387398.[Medline]
- Pratali L, Picano E, Otasevic P, Vigna C, Palinkas A, Cortigiani L, Dodi C, Bojic D, Varga A, Csanady M, Landi P. (2001) Prognostic significance of the dobutamine echocardiography test in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 88:13741378.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Drozdz J, Krzeminska-Pakula M, Plewka M, Ciesielczyk M, Kasprzak JD. (2002) Prognostic value of low-dose dobutamine echocardiography in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Chest 121:12161222.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Pratali L, Oatsevic P, Rigo F, Gherardi S, Neskovic A, Picano E. (2005) The additive prognostic value of restrictive pattern and dipyridamole-induced contractile reserve in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail 7:844851.[Medline]
- Neglia D, Michelassi C, Trivieri MG, Sambuceti G, Giorgetti A, Pratali L, Gallopin M, Salvadori P, Sorace O, Carpeggiani C, Poddighe R, L'Abbate A, Parodi O. (2002) Prognostic role of myocardial blood flow impairment in idiopathic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 105:186193.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Rigo F, Richieri M, Pasanisi E, Cutaia V, Zanella C, Della Valentina P, Di Pede F, Raviele A, Picano E. (2003) Usefulness of coronary flow reserve over regional wall motion when added to dual-imaging dipyridamole echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 91:269273.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Nohtomi Y, Takeuchi M, Nagasawa K, Arimura K, Miyata K, Kuwata K, Yamawaki T, Kondo S, Yamada A, Okamatsu S. (2003) Simultaneous assessment of wall motion and coronary flow velocity in the left anterior descending coronary artery during dipyridamole stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:457463.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Lowenstein J, Tiano C, Marquez G, Presti C, Quiroz C. (2003) Simultaneous analysis of wall motion and coronary flow reserve of the left anterior descending coronary artery by transthoracic doppler echocardiography during dipyridamole stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:607613.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Santagata P, Rigo F, Gherardi S, Pratali L, Drosdz J, Varga A, Picano E. (2005) Clinical and functional determinants of coronary flow reserve in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. An echocardiographic study. Int J Cardiol 105:4652.[Medline]
- Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, Gutgesell H, Reichek N, Sahn D, Schnittger I. (1989) Recommendations for quantitation of left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography (American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommitee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms). J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2:358367.[Medline]
- Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I, Reichek N. (1986) Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 57:450458.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Quinones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi WA. (2002) Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standard Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15:167184.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Armstrong WF, Pellikka PA, Ryan T, Crouse L, Zoghbi WA. (1998) Stress echocardiography: recommendations for performance and interpretation of stress echocardiography. Stress Echocardiography Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 11:97104.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Krzanowski M, Bodzon W, Dimitrow PP. (2003) Imaging of all three coronary arteries by transthoracic echocardiography. An illustrated guide. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 1:16.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Rigo F, Varga Z, Di Pede F, Grassi G, Turiano G, Zuin G, Coli U, Raviele A, Picano E. (2004) Early assessment of coronary flow reserve by transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography predicts late remodelling in reperfused anterior myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 17:750755.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Hosmer DW and Lemeshow S. (1999) Applied Survival Analysis (Wiley, New York).
- Ng'andu N. (1997) An empirical comparison of statistical tests for assessing the proportional hazards assumption of Cox's model. Stat Med 16:611626.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Rigo F, Cortigiani L, Pasanisi E, Richieri M, Cutaia V, Celestre M, Raviele A, Picano E. (2005) The additional prognostic value of coronary flow reserve on left anterior descending artery in patients with negative stress echo by wall motion criteria. A transthoracic vasodilator stress echo study. Am Heart J 149:684689.
- Neglia D, Parodi O, Gallopin M, Sambuceti G, Giorgetti A, Pratali L, Salvadori P, Michelassi C, Lunardi M, Pelosi G. (1995) Myocardial blood flow response to pacing tachycardia and to dipyridamole infusion in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy without overt heart failure: a quantitative assessment by positron emission tomography. Circulation 92:796804.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Watzinger N, Lund GK, Saeed M, Reddy GP, Araoz PA, Yang M, Schwartz AB, Bedigian M, Higgins CB. (2005) Myocardial blood flow in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: quantitative assessment with velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary sinus. J Magn Reson Imag 21:347353.[Medline]
- Skalidis EI, Parthenakis FI, Patrianakos AP, Hamilos MI, Vardas PE. (2004) Regional coronary flow and contractile reserve in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:20272032.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Skalidis EI, Kochiadakis GE, Koukouraki SI, Parthenakis FI, Karkavitsas NS, Vardas PE. (1999) Phasic coronary flow pattern and flow reserve in patients with left bundle branch block and normal coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:13381346.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Treasure CB, Vita JA, Cox DA, Fish RD, Gordon JB, Mudge GH, Colucci WS, Sutton MG, Selwyn AP, Alexander RW. (1990) Endothelium-dependent dilation of the coronary microvasculature is impaired in dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 81:772779.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Inoue T, Sakai Y, Morooka S, Hayashi T, Takayanagi K, Yamaguchi H, Kakoi H, Takabatake Y. (1994) Vasodilatory capacity of coronary resistance vessels in dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Heart 127:376381.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Cannon RO III, Cunnion RE, Parillo JE, Palmeri ST, Tucker EE, Schenke WH, Epstein SE. (1987) Dynamic limitation of coronary vasodilator reserve in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 10:11901200.[Abstract]
- Chen JW, Ting CT, Chen YH, Wu TC, Hsu NW, Lin SJ, Chang MS. (1999) Differential coronary microvascular function in patients with left ventricular dysfunction of unknown causeimplication for possible mechanism of myocardial ischemia in early stage of cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol 69:251261.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Cecchi F, Olivotto I, Gistri R, Lorenzoni R, Chiriatti G, Camici PG. (2003) Coronary microvascular dysfunction and prognosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 349:10271035.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Lim HE, Shim WJ, Rhee H, Kim SM, Hwang GS, Kim YH, Seo HS, Oh DJ, Ro YM. (2000) Assessment of coronary flow reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: comparison among adenosine, standard-dose dipyridamole, and high-dose dipyridamole. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 13:264270.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Hoffmann R, Lethen H, Marwick T, Arnese M, Fioretti P, Pingitore A, Picano E, Buck T, Erbel R, Flachskampf FA, Hanrath P. (1996) Analysis of interinstitutional observer agreement in interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 27:330336.[Abstract]
- Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E, Grayburn PA, Kraft CD, Levine RA, Nihoyannopoulos P, Otto CM, Quinones MA, Rakowski H, Stewart WJ, Waggoner A, Weissman NJ. American Society of Echocardiography. (2003) Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:777802.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Picano E, Landi P, Bolognese L, Chiarandà G, Chiarella F, Seveso G, Sclavo MG, Gandolfo N, Previtali M, Orlandini A, Margaria F, Pirelli S, Magaja O, Minardi G, Bianchi F, Marini C, Raciti M, Michelassi C, Severi S, for the EPIC Study Group. (1993) Prognostic value of dipyridamole echocardiography early after uncomplicated myocardial infarction: a large-scale multicenter trial. Am J Med 11:608618.
- Dimitrow P, Galderisi M, Rigo F. (2005) The non-invasive documentation of coronary microcirculation impairment: role of transthoracic echocardiography. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 3:18.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Rigo F. (2005) Coronary flow reserve in stress-echo lab. From pathophysiologic toy to diagnostic tool. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 3:8.[CrossRef][Medline]
Related articles in EHJ:
- Prognosis of coronary flow reserve: a new therapeutic target?
- Jose Zamorano and Borja Ruiz Mateos
EHJ 2006 27: 1266-1267.[Extract] [Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Meimoun and C. Tribouilloy Non-invasive assessment of coronary flow and coronary flow reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: a magic tool for the real world Eur J Echocardiogr, July 1, 2008; 9(4): 449 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sicari, P. Nihoyannopoulos, A. Evangelista, J. Kasprzak, P. Lancellotti, D. Poldermans, J.-U. Voigt, J. L. Zamorano, and on behalf of the European Association of Echocardi Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC) Eur J Echocardiogr, July 1, 2008; 9(4): 415 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Rigo, R. Sicari, S. Gherardi, A. Djordjevic-Dikic, L. Cortigiani, and E. Picano The additive prognostic value of wall motion abnormalities and coronary flow reserve during dipyridamole stress echo Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2008; 29(1): 79 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Cortigiani, F. Rigo, S. Gherardi, R. Sicari, M. Galderisi, F. Bovenzi, and E. Picano Additional Prognostic Value of Coronary Flow Reserve in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients With Negative Dipyridamole Stress Echocardiography by Wall Motion Criteria J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 2, 2007; 50(14): 1354 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Pitt and G. S. Pitt Added Benefit of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blockade in the Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death Circulation, June 12, 2007; 115(23): 2976 - 2982. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nemes, M. L. Geleijnse, O. I.I. Soliman, and F. J. ten Cate Prognostic role of combination of coronary flow reserve with aortic distensibility indices Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2006; 27(21): 2607 - 2608. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zamorano and B. R. Mateos Prognosis of coronary flow reserve: a new therapeutic target? Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2006; 27(11): 1266 - 1267. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




