Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on April 27, 2006
European Heart Journal 2006 27(12):1485-1494; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi891
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/12/1485    most recent
ehi891v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Coghlan, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Coghlan, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Role of N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (N-TproBNP) in scleroderma-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension

Mark H. Williams1, Clive E. Handler2, Raza Akram1, Colette J. Smith4, Clare Das2, Joanna Smee2, Devaki Nair3, Christopher P. Denton2, Carol M. Black2 and John G. Coghlan1,*

1 Department of Cardiology, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK
2 Pulmonary Hypertension Service, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, UK
3 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, UK
4 Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Rowland Hill Street, London, UK

Received 18 November 2005; revised 29 March 2006; accepted 30 March 2006; online publish-ahead-of-print 27 April 2006.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44 20 7830 2455; fax: +44 20 7472 6291. E-mail address: gerry.coghlan{at}royalfree.nhs.uk


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Aims The aims of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic value and to explore the prognostic value of N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (N-TproBNP) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) both with and without pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

Methods and results N-TproBNP, six-minute walk distance (SMWD), haemodynamics (at right heart catheterization) or tricuspid gradient (by echocardiography), and survival were assessed in 109 patients with SSc. The study population included 68 individuals with PAH [mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) >25 mmHg and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure <15 mmHg] and 41 individuals without PAH. In patients with PAH, the prognostic value of baseline and change in WHO functional class, N-TproBNP levels, and SMWD were compared using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard analysis. The mean duration of follow-up was 10 months (range 1–18 months). One year survival in patients with normal PAP was 100% when compared with 83.5% in those with SSc-PAH (P<0.05). The patients without PAH had a mean N-TproBNP level of 139 pg/mL (SD 151); those with SSc-PAH had a significantly higher mean N-TproBNP level of 1474 pg/mL (SD 2642) (P=0.0002). Among patients with PAH for every order of magnitude increase in N-TproBNP level there was a four-fold increased risk of death (P=0.002 for baseline level and P=0.006 for follow-up level). Baseline N-TproBNP levels were correlated positively with mean PAP (r=0.62; P<0.0001), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (r=0.81; P<0.0001), and inversely with SMWD (r=–0.46; P<0.0001). Among patients with SSc-PAH, 13 patients (19%) were in WHO functional classes II and had mean N-TproBNP levels of 325 pg/mL (SD 388). Fifty-three patients (78%) were in WHO classes III and IV and had significantly higher mean N-TproBNP levels of 1677 pg/mL (SD 2835) (P=0.02). At an N-TproBNP level of 395 pg/mL, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting the presence of SSc-PAH were 56 and 95% respectively.

Conclusion Raised N-TproBNP levels are directly related to the severity of PAH. In screening programs, SSc patients with an N-TproBNP in excess of 395 pg/mL have a very high probability of having pulmonary hypertension. Baseline and serial changes in N-TproBNP levels are highly predictive of survival. A 10-fold increase in N-TproBNP level on therapy is associated with a greater than three-fold increase in mortality, and may indicate therapeutic failure.

Key Words: Scleroderma • Pulmonary arterial hypertension • Survival • Natriuretic peptides • Prognosis • Right heart haemodynamics


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) affects approximately 12% of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and is associated with a worse prognosis than idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH).13 Breathlessness is common in patients with SSc as the condition may affect the lungs, heart, and musculoskeletal system with, thus scleroderma-associated pulmonary artery hypertension (SSc-PAH) is often diagnosed too late for patients to derive maximum benefit from disease-modifying therapies.

End-stage SSc-PAH may be suspected clinically in a patient with SSc who becomes progressively breathless and who has signs of PAH and right heart failure. An accurate method for early diagnosis of SSc-PAH and identifying patients at high risk is important for management. Current non-invasive screening tests are of limited diagnostic and prognostic value.4

We have shown that the prognosis of patients with SSc-PAH can be improved significantly with disease-modifying therapies (including endothelin antagonists and prostanoids) underpinned by modern approaches to care delivery and efforts to diagnose the condition early.5 Further improvements in morbidity and mortality associated with this condition depend on accurate and early diagnosis of PAH as well as more effective therapies.

Our current practice is to screen all patients with SSc for PAH using pulmonary function tests and echocardiography. PAH is likely in breathless patients, particularly those with a reduced transfer factor who have normal lung volumes. However, lung function tests remain insufficiently sensitive to exclude SSc-PAH. Echocardiography has limited value in PAH except at high levels (tricuspid gradient above 45 mmHg) when it correlates well with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) at right heart cardiac catheterization. Echocardiographic estimations of PAP at levels below 25 mmHg are useful in excluding PAH.4 As a screening tool echocardiography has many limitations, not least being highly operator-dependent and relatively cumbersome to perform to an optimal standard. There is a pressing need for a simpler screening tool to identify patients with SSc who require cardiac catheretization.

PAH is present if the mPAP is >25 mmHg at rest and >30 mmHg after exercise at cardiac catheterization. This test is not, however, useful as a screening tool.

Treatment of SSc-PAH is presently guided largely by symptom severity. Disease-modifying therapies—endothelin antagonists, prostanoids, and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors—are licenced in Europe for patients with severe functional limitation (WHO Class III).6 Given the multiple contributors to dyspnoea in SSc, the value of this parameter in managing PAH is less clear than in patients with IPAH.

Six-minute walk distance (SMWD) has been shown to be an independent predictor of mortality in patients with IPAH,7 but not in SSc-PAH.5 In IPAH change in SMWD is used as a guide to the continuing efficacy of therapy. SMWD in the SSc-PAH population may be influenced by musculoskeletal and psychological factors, and so may not represent a true picture of a patient's clinical state.

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a peptide hormone released from both right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) myocardial cells in response to increased myocardial pressure and/or volume overload.8 An increase in ventricular wall stretch results in activation of the BNP gene transcription, leading to a release of BNP.9 BNP levels are high in LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction and acute coronary syndromes.1013 It has been shown to be a useful screening test for congestive cardiac failure, and is a strong predictor of morbidity and mortality.10,1420

There have been few studies of BNP in conditions affecting the right heart. In small studies, BNP has been shown to be elevated in various forms of PAH including IPAH,21 PAH associated with interstitial lung disease,22 congenital systemic-to-pulmonary shunts,23 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,24 chronic thrombo-embolic disease,25 and SSc-PAH.26 Nagaya et al.27 studied the relationship between baseline and 3-month BNP levels and survival in 60 patients with IPAH, however, his findings have yet to be confirmed, and the more stable N-TproBNP analogue has not been evaluated in a prognostic study of a sizable population with PAH.

We have previously proposed the use of N-TproBNP as a screening tool for SSc-PAH. This previous study included 49 patients with scleroderma of which 23 patients had PAH confirmed at right heart catheterization and 26 did not have PAH. The mean value of N-TproBNP for patients with SSc-PAH and without PAH were 3365 and 347 pg/mL, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that a cut-off value of 395 pg/mL had a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 100% for SSc-PAH.26

The aims of this larger study were to assess prospectively the specificity of 395 pg/mL in a larger population and to evaluate the prognostic value of N-TproBNP in a homogenous group of patients with SSc-PAH.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Population
Patients were selected from the population attending the National Pulmonary Hypertension service screening and treatment program at the Royal Free Hospital. Those with SSc-PAH were selected from the 134 patients under active follow-up between August 2003 and April 2004 using the criteria set out below. Those without PAH included patients in whom SSc-PAH was excluded at catheter study for suspected PAH (precise criteria detailed under patient selection) and patients randomly selected from routine follow-up clinics of SSc patients in whom annual screening assessment suggested a very low likelihood of PAH. Recruitment was planned to include a minimum of 60 with SSc-PAH and 40 controls.

Ethical considerations
Local Research and Ethics Committee approval and informed consent was obtained from all subjects for all testing. The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Patient selection
All patients met the Arthritis and Rheumatism Council criteria for diagnosis of systemic sclerosis.28 Patients were recruited from our twice weekly pulmonary hypertension outpatients clinic using the following criteria:

  1. They had not been involved in our previous study of N-TproBNP levels in SSc-PAH.
  2. Cardiac catheterization had been performed within the previous 6 months or was planned. Patients who declined routine catheterization (n=12) were not excluded, where their condition had remained stable from the previous catheterization.

Patients were excluded if they had conditions known to affect N-TproBNP:

  1. Significant renal impairment (creatinine >150 µmol/L].
  2. Evidence of LV impairment on echocardiography or at cardiac catheterization (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >15 mmHg).

The control population included all patients who had undergone formal right and left heart catheterization and were found to have normal cardiac and pulmonary vascular findings on left and right heart study. As the numbers of such patients were quite small, this number was augmented using patients from our routine screening service, where the diagnosis of cardiac and pulmonary vascular disease was felt to be rigorously excluded: LV ejection fraction >55%; normal diastolic parameters; systemic blood pressure <140/85 mmHg without therapy; normal renal function; tricuspid gradient <2.5 m/s (25 mmHg); dyspnoea Grade 1 and TLCO >80% of predicted.

Right heart catheterization
Right heart catheterization was performed in accordance with our previous reported protocol.1 A vasodilator trial was not performed as we have found this to provide no useful information on patients with connective tissue disease-associated PAH. For the purpose of baseline haemodynamics, the results obtained at the most recent catheterization was used, in 12 cases this was between 6 and 24 months before study entry. However, where planned routine follow catheterization was performed within 8 weeks of study entry (n=11) this data was used as the baseline data.

Six-minute walk test
Six-minute walk tests were performed by all patients using a standardized protocol in accordance with the American Thoracic Society guidelines.29 Patients who were unable to perform the test were recorded as achieving a distance of 0 m.

WHO functional class assessment
Functional class assessment was recorded in accordance with the WHO functional classification from 1998.30

Blood sampling and assay
Blood samples were analysed for biochemistry (including renal function) and N-TproBNP levels. Samples were transported to the chemical pathology department in serum gel tubes at room temperature where they were centrifuged and either analysed immediately or stored at –20°C for later analysis. The serum N-TproBNP level was measured on the Roche Modular Analytics E-170 (Eleccys module) immunoassay analyser. The method of sandwich immunoassay using electrochemiluminescence detection, is the standard method used in our department and shows high reproducibility.

In the patients without PAH, the baseline N-TproBNP levels were taken at their first visit. In the patients with SSc-PAH, N-TproBNP levels were measured at entry and every 3 months thereafter during the year of follow-up.

Echocardiography
M-mode and 2D-echocardiography were performed using an Acuson (Sequoia C256/512) echocardiogram. Continuous wave Doppler signals were recorded with a ‘Doptek’ (Southampton, UK) 2.0 MHz transducer. The peak instantaneous pressure drop from the right ventricle to the right atrium was calculated for the peak signal velocity from the tricuspid regurgitant (TR) signal by the simplified Bernoulli equation. No estimate of right atrial pressure was added to the Bernoulli equation value obtained from the TR jet, as previously described.4

Statistical methods
As the primary aim was to assess the reproducibility of the 395 pg/mL cut-off identified previously, we initially assessed specificity, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values associated with this cut-off in our sample. Wilson method was used to find 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Then, sensitivity and specificity of different cut-off levels on N-TproBNP for diagnosis and exclusion of SSc-PAH were calculated. ROC curves were drawn to identify N-TproBNP levels which gave optimal sensitivities and specificities for diagnosis and exclusion of SSc-PAH.

The association of BNP with a number of known markers for the severity of SSc-PAH was assessed. For this analysis, only patients with a diagnosis of SSc-PAH were included. The initial outcome markers examined were tricuspid gradient based on echo, mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and cardiac index from right heart catheterization, SMWD, and WHO class. These markers were examined and found to be normally distributed. However, the N-TproBNP was log-transformed to the base 10 in order to achieve normality. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to analyse the correlation with N-TproBNP levels. The association between N-TproBNP and survival was undertaken using Cox proportional hazards models. The proportional hazards assumption was assessed visually using stratified Kaplan–Meier plots and found to be adequate. Data are presented as mean (SD). All factors associated with survival with a P-value of less than 0.1 in the univariate analysis were included in an initial multivariable model. The final model was chosen using backward selection with exclusion criteria of P>0.05.

All statistical tests were two-sided and a P-value of less than 0.05 was nominally considered as statistically significant. We have made no formal adjustments for errors caused by multiple testing (Type 1 error), as there was a single primary aim for our study, which was to investigate the reproducibility of our previously found cut-off of 395 pg/mL. However, it is important to regard other analyses carried out in the light of the risk of type 1 error.

Follow-up
Survival data were available for all patients until the date of death (16 patients) or 13th May 2005. Standard survival methods were used to compare survival times between those with SSc-PAH and those without.

N-TproBNP was included as a time-updated variable. Thus, our model estimated the effect of the most recent N-TproBNP on the hazard of survival. For the purpose of analysis, an individual was assumed to have a constant N-TproBNP after the date it was measured until the date of the next measurement, at which time this value was taken.

Subsequent survival analyses focused on the predictive value of N-TproBNP levels in patients with SSc-PAH, and so analyses only included those with SSc-PAH. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse the association between N-TproBNP and survival. As patients had more than one N-TproBNP measurement, both N-TproBNP levels at the time of entry into the study and time-updated levels were included in the analyses.

For the purpose of analysis, an individual was assumed to have a constant N-TproBNP after the date it was measured until the date of the next measurement, at which time the value was updated.31


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
A total of 109 patients were enrolled in this study. Sixty-eight patients had SSc-PAH confirmed at cardiac catheterization [mean age 60 (10) years]. Forty-one patients had SSc but normal tricuspid gradient on echocardiography (<25 mmHg). The mean estimated TG in this group was 20 (7) mmHg. Of the 41 patients, 11 of them had unexplained breathlessness and were enrolled after cardiac catheterization excluded PAH, LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction and coronary heart disease. The clinical profile and haemodynamic data are shown in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Patient clinical profile and haemodynamics

 
Correlation of plasma N-TproBNP levels with cardiopulmonary haemodynamics
N-TproBNP levels in patients with SSc-PAH were significantly higher than in those without PAH [1474 (2642) pg/mL vs. 139 (151) pg/mL, P=0.0002]. In patients with SSc-PAH, N-TproBNP positively and significantly correlated with mPAP (r=0.62; P<0.0001), PVR (r=0.81; P<0.0001), and RAP (r=0.53; P<0.0001). N-TproBNP inversely and significantly correlated with cardiac index (r=–0.5; P<0.0001). (Figure 1).


Figure 8911
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Graphs showing correlation of plasma N-TproBNP levels with cardiopulmonary haemodynamics (mPAP, PVR, RAP, and cardiac index).

 
Association of plasma N-TproBNP levels with WHO class
In patients with SSc-PAH, the mean (SD) N-TproBNP level in the 53 (78%) patients with WHO classes III and IV dyspnoea was significantly higher than in the 13 (19%) patients with WHO class II dyspnoea [1677 (2835) pg/mL vs. 325 (388) pg/mL; P=0.02] (Figure 2).


Figure 8912
View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Association of N-TproBNP with WHO class in patients with SSc-PAH.

 
Correlation of plasma N-TproBNP levels with exercise capacity
There was a significant inverse correlation of N-TproBNP levels with SMWD. The mean (SD) N-TproBNP in patients with an SMWD less than 350 m was 1478 (2691) pg/mL compared with 326 (989) pg/mL in patients with an SMWD greater than 350 m (P<0.0001). For every 100 m further an individual could walk, there was a significant fall in N-TproBNP levels (Figure 3).


Figure 8913
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Correlation of N-TproBNP with SMWD.

 
The diagnostic ability of BNP to predict the presence of SSc-PAH
Only two of the 41 patients without SSc-PAH had a level of N-TproBNP >395 pg/mL, giving a specificity of 95.1% (95% CI 83.9, 98.7%). Of the 68 patients, 38 with SSc-PAH had a level greater than this giving a sensitivity of 55.9% (95% CI 44.1, 67.4%). Of the 40, 38 patients who had a level greater than 395 pg/mL had SSc-PAH giving a positive predictive value of 95.1% (95% CI 83.9, 98.7%). (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value of N-TproBNP for predicting SSc-PAH

 
Figure 4 shows an ROC curve of N-TproBNP to predict the presence of SSc-PAH. A sensitivity of 90% (95% CI 80, 95%) was achieved at a cut-off N-TproBNP level of 91 pg/mL. This level gives a specificity of 51% (95% CI 37, 66%) and positive and negative predictive values of 75% (95% CIs 65, 83, 57, and 87%, respectively).


Figure 8914
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 ROC curves of the ability of N-TproBNP to predict the presence of SSc-PAH. A sensitivity of 90%, corresponds with a cut-off N-TproBNP of 91 pg/mL. This gives a specificity of 51% and positive and negative predictive values of 75%, respectively.

 
Survival with SSc-PAH
All patients with SSc-PAH confirmed at right heart catheterization were followed for 1 year. There were 16 deaths during the follow-up period. The survival rates at 6 months and 1 year were 90% (95% CI 82, 97%) and 84% (95% CI 75, 92%; Kaplan–Meier estimates).

Changes in N-TproBNP and survival
N-TproBNP levels were measured in 52 patients with SSc-PAH at three-monthly intervals during the 1 year follow-up period. Baseline N-TproBNP, change in N-TproBNP, baseline cardiopulmonary haemodynamics, scleroderma-subset (whether limited or diffuse type), age, gender, ethnicity, WHO class, and SMWD were included in a Cox proportional hazards model (Table 3). Baseline N-TproBNP and change in N-TproBNP significantly predicted survival in both univariable and multivariable analyses. For every 10-fold increase in baseline N-TproBNP level there was a five-fold increased risk of dying [Hazard ratio (HR)=4.82; 95% CI 1.29, 18.05; P=0.002]. For every 10-fold increase in follow-up N-TproBNP (from baseline) there was a four-fold increased risk of dying (HR=3.82; 95% CI 1.46, 9.96; P=0.006). Gender was also significantly associated with survival, male patients being five times more likely to die than female patients (HR=5.07; 95% CI 1.81, 14.16; P=0.002). Ethnicity, scleroderma subtype, age, and baseline haemodynamic parameters were not found to be significantly associated with survival in this study in either univariable or multivariable analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Cox proportional hazards model of factors associated with survival in SSc-PAH. Univariable and multivariable analyses

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Value of N-TproBNP in screening for SSc-PAH
This study confirms our previous finding that a cut-off value at or >395 pg/mL, N-TproBNP strongly supports the diagnosis of SSc-PAH in patients where this diagnosis is suspected, with a positive predictive value of 95% and modest negative predictive value. We have also shown that, in a small control population, only at very low levels of N-TproBNP can one consider this a ‘rule out’ test. Although further work is necessary to evaluate the role of N-TproBNP as a screening investigation, it is clear that the positive and negative predictive values are similar to those observed with echocardiography.4

Prognostic value of N-TproBNP
In this study, N-TproBNP predicted survival in patients with SSc-PAH. Both the baseline level and change in N-TproBNP predicted survival; the higher the level, the worse the prognosis. The 6 months and 1 year survival of patients with a level below the median (553 pg/mL) were 97 and 96% respectively, and 82 and 73% for patients with a level greater than this.

Relationship of N-TproBNP to predictors of survival in PAH
Significant correlations were observed between N-TproBNP levels and cardiopulmonary haemodynamics, WHO functional class, and SMWD. We have previously shown that survival in patients with SSc-PAH is related to cardiopulmonary haemodynamics.5 These data may explain why raised levels of N-TproBNP were associated with an adverse prognosis in this study. We have shown that N-TproBNP levels independently and incrementally predict survival in SSc-PAH.

Use of N-TproBNP to monitor disease
Disease progression in SSc-PAH and trials of drug efficacy in PAH are monitored using WHO functional class and the SMWD test. Both these assessments have their limitations as they are not objective. In patients with SSc-PAH, perception of functional status and performance during the SMWD may be affected by their general musculoskeletal, myocardial, and pulmonary interstitial involvement. The fact that N-TproBNP correlates with WHO functional class and SMWD in a population with SSc-PAH, suggests that the dominant influence on these factors in this selected population is indeed right heart strain. N-TproBNP is less influenced by other factors than functional status and SMWT and thus, provides an attractive alternative for monitoring disease progression and response to therapy.

N-TproBNP in right heart failure
In heart failure and myocardial infarction, raised plasma BNP levels are a well-validated and established marker of disease state and indicate a poor prognosis.32 BNP levels are now recommended as part of the routine evaluation of patients with left heart failure.33 There is limited information on the use of BNP in right heart failure, particularly in a sizeable and homogenous group of patients.2127 In a study of 28 patients with iPAH, single BNP levels correlated with right heart haemodynamics, WHO functional class, and SMWD but there was no follow-up data. Therefore, although the authors concluded that BNP was an excellent marker for assessing functional impairment in IPAH because of right heart failure, they were unable to show that BNP may also be of value as a marker of disease progression.21 Only Nayaga et al. has shown an association with survival in IPAH relying on a binary approach of considering whether levels were above or below the median. BNP levels change rapidly in response to exercise and thus, in patients with significant dyspnoea BNP, as a test, has significant practical limitations. Our data enhances previous data, by showing that the more stable analogue (N-TproBNP) can be used and by showing that the relationship with prognosis is log-linear both at baseline in response to change in N-TproBNP level, and is thus applicable in all patients, irrespective of the median level in the population.

Proposed mechanisms of N-TproBNP release
Factors leading to the release of BNP include endothelin-1,34 angiotensin-II,35 and glucocorticoids.36 It is synthesised as an inactive precursor preproBNP, which is subsequently cleaved to form proBNP. This is further split to form the active BNP and inactive N-terminal fragment (N-TproBNP).37 BNP acts via natriuretic peptide receptors (NPR). These are transmembrane receptors which use cyclic 3', 5'-guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) as the intracellular second messenger.38 BNP binds to both NPR-A and NPR-C.39 NPR-C is involved in the breakdown and clearance of natriuretic peptides from the circulation.40 Through its interaction with NPR-A, BNP promotes intravascular volume contraction41 and hypotension,42 promotes diuresis43 (antagonizing the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system).44


    Limitations
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
We have assessed the optimal cut-off for sensitivity and specificity of N-TproBNP in a single study, and thus our cut-off may be sensitive to the specific study population. Indeed one of our primary aims was to assess whether the 395 pg/mL cut-off identified to investigate this further, such as boot strapping, are beyond the scope of this study.

This study was not designed to, or sufficiently powered to investigate the role of N-TproBNP as a ‘rule-out test’. More control patients would need to be included for this analysis. The majority of patients with PAH were already on advanced therapies and so this may confound the interpretation of N-TproBNP levels as a diagnostic test, as we do not know whether these therapies have a direct effect on BNP levels. However, this would not appreciably affect interpretation of N-TproBNP levels as a prognostic test. We did not look at the effect of treatment or no treatment on N-TproBNP levels. N-TproBNP levels are however, known to fall in response to effective disease-modifying therapy (Bosentan) in patients with IPAH,45 correlating this fall with improved survival would have immense implications for future treatment monitoring.


    Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In patients identified as having probable SScPAH on echocardiography, an N-TproBNP level >395pg/mL strongly supports the diagnosis. Baseline and change in N-TproBNP levels identify patients with SSc-PAH who have a particularly adverse prognosis who may benefit from the introduction of or modification of advanced therapies. For every 10-fold change in N-TproBNP level up or down then prognosis worsens or improves nearly four-fold. N-TproBNP is the most powerful non-invasive prognostic tool identified to date for patients with SSc-PAH. Further work is required to demonstrate whether falling levels observed in response to therapy, consistently translate into early confirmation of beneficial disease modification. However, increasing levels despite treatment, is associated with an adverse prognosis and should lead to modification of the therapeutic strategy.

N-TproBNP identifies patients with SSc-PAH with a similar positive and negative predictive values to that seen with echocardiography. Establishing N-TproBNP as a screening tool for this population will require further work, in particular, a large-scale study in a population with SSc but without known PAH.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
I would like the thank Miss Elizabeth Neville for her help with the biochemical analyses.

Conflict of interest: D.N. is in receipt of a grant from Roche Pharmaceuticals. There are no other potential conflicts of interest.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Mukerjee D, St George D, Coleiro B, Knight C, Denton CP, Davar J, Black CM, Coghlan JG. (2003) Prevalence and outcome in systemic sclerosis associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: application of a registry approach. Ann Rheum Dis 62:1088–1093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Wigley FM, Mayes M, Limia JAC, McLain DA, Chaplin L, Ward-Able C. The point prevalence of undiagnosed pulmonary hypertension (PAH) in patients with connective tissue disease (CTD) attending community based rheumatology clinics (UNCOVER study). Program and abstracts of the Americal College of Rheumatology, 68th Annual Scientific MeetingOctober 16–24, 2004San Antonio, TX, USA Abstract 1057.
  3. Hachulla E, Gressin V, Guillevin L, de Groote P, Cabane J, Carpentier P, Frances C, Kahan A, Humbert M. (2004) Pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: definition of a screening algorithm for early detection (ItinerAIR-Sclerodermie Study) (article in French). Rev Med Interne 25:340–347.[Medline]
  4. Mukerjee DSt, George D, Knight D, Davar J, Well AU, Du Bois RM, Black CM, Coghlan JG. (2004) Echocardiography and pulmonary function as screening tests for pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 43:461–466.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Williams MH, Das C, Handler CE, Akram R, Davar J, Denton CP, Smith CJ, Black CM, Coghlan JG. Improved survival of systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension in the endothelin antagonist era. Heart Published online ahead of print January 31, 2006.
  6. Simmoneau G, Galié N, Rubin LJ, Langleben D, Seeger W, Domenighetti G, Gibbs S, Lebrec D, Speich R, Beghetti M, Rich S, Fishman A. (2004) Clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:(Suppl. 12S), 5S–12S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Miyamoto S, Nagaya N, Satoh T, Kyotani S, Sakamaki F, Fujita M, Nakanishi N, Miyatake K. (2000) Clinical correlates and prognostic significance of six-minute walk test in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension: comparison with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161:487–492.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Mukoyama M, Nakao K, Hosoda K, Suga S, Saito Y, Ogawa Y, Shirakami G, Jougasaki M, Obata K, Yause H, Kambayashi Y, Inouye K, Imura H. (1991) Brain natriuretic peptide as novel cardiac hormone in humans. Evidence for an exquisite dual natriuretic peptide system, atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide. J Clin Invest 87:1401–1412.
  9. Hama N, Itoh H, Shirakami G, Nakagawa O, Suga S, Ogawa Y, Masuda I, Nakanishi K, Yoshimasa T, Hashimoto Y, Yamaguchi M, Hori R, Yasue H, Nakao K. (1995) Rapid ventricular induction of brain natriuretic peptide gene expression in experimental acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 92:1558–1564.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Maisel AS, Krishnaswamy P, Nowak RM, McCord J, Hollander JE, Duc P, Omland T, Storrow AB, Abraham WT, Wu AH, Clopton P, Steg PG, Westheim A, Knudsen CW, Perez A, Kazanegra R, Herrmann HC, McCullough PA. (2002) Rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure. N Engl J Med 347:161–167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. de Lemos JA and Morrow DA. (2003) Combining natriuretic peptides and necrosis marker in the assessment of acute coronary syndromes. Rev Cardiovasc Med 4:(Suppl. 4), S37–S46.
  12. Omland T, de Lemos JA, Morrow DA, Antman EM, Cannon CP, Hall C, Braunwald E. (2002) Prognostic value of N-terminal pro-atrial and pro-brain natriuretic peptide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol 89:463–465.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Krishnaswamy P, Lubien E, Clopton P, Koon J, Kazanegra R, Wanner E, Gardetto N, Garcia A, De Maria A, Maisel AS. (2001) Utility of B-natriuretic peptide levels in identifying patients with left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Am J Med 111:274–279.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. de Lemos JA, McGuire DK, Razner MH. (2003) B-type natriuretic peptide in cardiovascular disease. Lancet 362:316–322.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Richards AM, Doughty R, Nicholls MG, MacMahon S, Ikram H, Sharpe N, Espiner EA, Frampton C, Yandle TG for the Australia-New Zealand Heart Failure Group. (1999) Neurohumoral prediction of benefit from carvedilol in ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 99:786–792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Maeda K, Tsutamoto T, Wada A, Mabuchi N, Hayashi M, Tsutsui Y, Ohnishi M, Sawaki M, Fujii M, Matsumoto T, Kinoshita M. (2000) High levels of brain natriuretic peptide and interleukin-6 after optimized treatment for heart failure are independent risk factors for morbidity and mortality in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1587–1593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Stanek B, Frey B, Hulsmann M, Berger R, Sturm B, Strametz-Juranek J, Bergler-Klein J, Moser P, Bojic A, Harrter E, Pacher R. (2001) Prognostic evaluation of neurohumoral plasma levels before and during beta-blocker therapy in advanced left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:436–442.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Omland T, Aakvaag A, Bonarjee VV, Caidahl K, Lie RT, Nilsen DW, Sundsfjord JA, Dickstein K. (1996) Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as an indicator of left ventricular systolic function and long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction. Comparison with plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide. Circulation 93:1963–1969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Arad M, Elazar E, Shotan A, Klein R, Rabinowitz B. (1997) Brain and atrial natriuretic peptides in patients with ischaemic heart disease with and without heart failure. Circulation 87:12–17.
  20. Grantham JA and Burnett JC Jr. (1997) BNP: increasing importance in the pathophysiology and diagnosis of congestive heart failure. Circulation 96:388–390.
  21. Leuchte HH, Holzapfel M, Baumgartner RA, Ding I, Neurohr C, Vogeser M, Kolbe T, Schwaiblmair M, Behr J. (2004) Clinical significance of brain natriuretic peptide in primary pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:764–770.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Leuchte HH, Neurohr C, Baumgartner R, Holzapel M, Giehrl W, Vogeser M, Behr J. (2004) Brain natriuretic peptide and exercise capacity in lung fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 170:360–365.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Nagaya N, Nishikimi T, Uematsu M, Kyotani S, Satoh T, Nakanishi N, Matsuo H, Kangawa K. (1998) Secretion patterns of brain natriuretic peptide and atrial natriuretic peptide in patients with and without pulmonary hypertension complicating atrial septal defect. Am Heart J 136:297–301.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Goetze JP, Videbaek R, Boesgaard S, Aldershvile J, Rehfeld JF, Carlsen J. (2004) Pro-brain natriuretic peptide as a marker of cardiovascular or pulmonary causes of dyspnea in patients with terminal parenchymal lung disease. J Heart Lung Transplant 23:80–87.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Nagaya N, Ando M, Oya H, Ohkita Y, Kyotani S, Sakamaki F, Nakanishi N. (2002) Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as a non-invasive marker for efficacy of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 74:180–184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Mukerjee D, Yap LB, Holmes AM, Nair D, Ayrton P, Black CM, Coghlan JG. (2003) Significance of plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in patients with systemic sclerosis-related pulmonary arterial hypertension. Respir Med 97:1230–1236.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Nagaya N, Nishikimi T, Uematsu M, Satoh T, Kyotani S, Sakamaki F, Kakishita M, Fukushima K, Okano Y, Nakanishi N, Miyatake K, Kangawa K. (2001) Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as a prognostic indicator in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. J Cardiol 37:110–111.[Medline]
  28. Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Subcommittee for scleroderma criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee. Arth Rheum (1980) 23:581–590.[Web of Science][Medline]
  29. American Thoracic Society. (2002) ATS Statement: Guidelines for the Six-minute Walk Test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:111–117.[Free Full Text]
  30. Galie N, Torbicki A, Barst R, Dartevelle P, Haworth S, Higenbottam T, Olschewski H, Peacock A, Pietra G, Rubin LJ, Simonneau G. (2004) Guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 25:2243–2278.[Free Full Text]
  31. Collett D. (1994) Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research (Chapman and Hall, London, UK).
  32. Koglin J, Pehlivanli S, Schwaiblmair M, Vogeser M, Cremer P, vonScheidt W. (2001) Role of brain natriuretic peptide in risk stratification of patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:1934–1941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Swedberg K, Cleland J, Dargie H, Drexler H, Follath F, Komajda M, Tavazzi L, Smiseth OA, Gavazzi A, Haverich A, Hoes A, Jaarsma T, Korewicki J, Levy S, Linde C, Lopez-Sendon JL, Nieminen MS, Pierard L, Remme WJ. (2005) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005): The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 26:1115–1140.[Free Full Text]
  34. Bruneau BG, Piazza LA, de Bold AJ. (1997) BNP gene expression is specifically modulated by stretch and ET-1 in a new model of isolated rat atria. Am J Physiol 273:2678–2686.
  35. Wiese S, Breyer T, Dragu A, Wakili R, Burkard T, Schmidt-Schweda S, Fuchbauer EM, Dohrmann U, Beyersdorf F, Radickle D, Holubarsch CJ. (2000) Gene expression of brain natriuretic peptide in isolated atrial and ventricular human myocardium: influence of angiotensin II and diastolic fiber length. Circulation 102:3074–3079.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Nishimori T, Tsujino M, Sato K, Imai T, Marumo F, Hirata Y. (1997) Dexamethasone-induced up-regulation of adrenomedullin and atrial natriuretic peptide genes in cultured rat ventricular myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol 29:2125–2130.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  37. Sagnella GA. (2001) Measurement and importance of plasma brain natriuretic peptide and related peptides. Ann Clin Biochem 38:83–93.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  38. Chinkers M and Garbers DL. (1991) Signal transduction by guanylyl cyclases. Annu Rev Biochem 60:553–575.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  39. Garbers DL and Lowe DG. (1994) Guanylyl cyclase receptors. J Biol Chem 269:30741–30744.[Free Full Text]
  40. Matsukawa N, Grzesik WJ, Takahashi N, Pandey KN, Pang S, Yamauchi M, Smithies O. (1999) The natriuretic peptide clearance receptor locally modulates the physiological effects of the natriuretic peptide system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:7403–7408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Hunt PJ, Espiner EA, Nicholls MG, Richards AM, Yandle TG. (1996) Differing biological effects of equimolar atrial natriuretic peptide infusions in normal man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:3871–3876.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Suda M, Ogawa Y, Tanaka K, Tamura N, Yasoda A, Takigawa T, Uehira M, Nishimot H, Itoh H, Saito Y, Shiota K, Nakao K. (1998) Skeletal overgrowth in transgenic mice that overexpress brain natriuretic peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:2337–2342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Holmes SJ, Espiner EA, Richards AM, Yandle TG, Frampton C. (1993) Renal, endocrine and haemodynamics effects of human brain natriuretic peptide in normal man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76:91–96.[Abstract]
  44. Boomsma F and van den Meiracker AH. (2001) Plasma A- and B-type natriuretic peptides: physiology, methodology and clinical use. Cardovasc Res 51:442–449.[Free Full Text]
  45. Souza R, Jardim C, Martins B, Cortopassi F, Yaksic M, Rabelo R, Bogossian H. (2005) Effect of Bosentan treatment on surrogate markers in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Curr Med Res Opin 21:907–911.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. B. Badesch, H. C. Champion, M. A. Gomez Sanchez, M. M. Hoeper, J. E. Loyd, A. Manes, M. McGoon, R. Naeije, H. Olschewski, R. J. Oudiz, et al.
Diagnosis and Assessment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 30, 2009; 54(1_Suppl_S): S55 - S66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
M. Matucci-Cerinic, V. Steen, P. Nash, and E. Hachulla
The complexity of managing systemic sclerosis: screening and diagnosis
Rheumatology, June 1, 2009; 48(suppl_3): iii8 - iii13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
G. Warwick, P. S. Thomas, and D. H. Yates
Biomarkers in pulmonary hypertension
Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2008; 32(2): 503 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
I. R. Henkens, K. T. B. Mouchaers, A. Vonk-Noordegraaf, A. Boonstra, C. A. Swenne, A. C. Maan, S.-C. Man, J. W. R. Twisk, E. E. van der Wall, M. J. Schalij, et al.
Improved ECG detection of presence and severity of right ventricular pressure load validated with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): H2150 - H2157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
National Pulmonary Hypertension Centres of the UK
Consensus statement on the management of pulmonary hypertension in clinical practice in the UK and Ireland
Heart, March 1, 2008; 94(Suppl_1): i1 - i41.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
National Pulmonary Hypertension Centres of the UK
Consensus statement on the management of pulmonary hypertension in clinical practice in the UK and Ireland
Thorax, March 1, 2008; 63(Suppl_2): ii1 - ii41.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
M T Carulli, C Handler, J G Coghlan, C M Black, and C P Denton
Can CCL2 serum levels be used in risk stratification or to monitor treatment response in systemic sclerosis?
Ann Rheum Dis, January 1, 2008; 67(1): 105 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
J.G. Coghlan and J. Davar
How should we assess right ventricular function in 2008?
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2007; 9(suppl_H): H22 - H28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
A. Fijalkowska and A. Torbicki
Role of cardiac biomarkers in assessment of RV function and prognosis in chronic pulmonary hypertension
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2007; 9(suppl_H): H41 - H47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. C. Mathai and P. M. Hassoun
N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide in scleroderma-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension
Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 140 - 141.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
O. Distler and A. Pignone
Pulmonary arterial hypertension and rheumatic diseases--from diagnosis to treatment
Rheumatology, October 1, 2006; 45(suppl_4): iv22 - iv25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/12/1485    most recent
ehi891v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Coghlan, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Coghlan, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?