Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on November 18, 2005
European Heart Journal 2006 27(4):454-459; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi659
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/4/454    most recent
ehi659v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Regitz-Zagrosek, V.
Right arrow Articles by Hein, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Regitz-Zagrosek, V.
Right arrow Articles by Hein, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

{alpha}2C-Adrenoceptor polymorphism is associated with improved event-free survival in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

Vera Regitz-Zagrosek1,2,*,{dagger}, Berthold Hocher2,3,{dagger}, Martin Bettmann1,{dagger}, Marc Brede4, Kerstin Hadamek4, Carolin Gerstner4, Hans Brendan Lehmkuhl1, Roland Hetzer1 and Lutz Hein4

1DHZB, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
2Center for Cardiovascular Research Charité, University-Medicine Berlin, Hessische Str 3-4, 10115 Berlin, Germany
3Division of Nephrology, Inselspital, University of Berne, CH-3008 Berne, Switzerland
4Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Freiburg, Germany

Received 17 May 2005; revised 19 October 2005; accepted 27 October 2005; online publish-ahead-of-print 18 November 2005.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 30 45932230; fax: +49 30 45932409. E-mail address: vrz{at}dhzb.de


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Aims The sympathetic nervous system plays a central role in cardiac growth but its overstimulation is associated with increased mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. Pre-synaptic {alpha}2-adrenoceptors are essential feedback regulators to control the release of norepinephrine from sympathetic nerves. In this study we tested whether a deletion polymorphism in the human {alpha}2C-adrenoceptor gene ({alpha}2CDel322–325) affects progression of heart failure in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

Methods and results We genotyped and phenotyped 345 patients presenting with DCM in the heart transplant unit of the German Heart Institute, starting in 1994. Patients were treated according to guidelines (99% ACEI, 76% ß-blockers) and were followed until December 2002 or until a first event [death, heart transplantation, or implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) for a life-threatening condition] occurred. Mean follow-up time was 249 weeks (4.9 years) in event-free patients and 104 weeks (2 years) in patients with events. During follow-up, 51% of the patients exhibited an event: death (18%), implantation of LVAD as bridging for transplantation (7%), or heart transplantation (25%). By Kaplan–Meier analysis, DCM patients with the deletion variant Del322–325 in the {alpha}2C-adrenoceptor showed significantly decreased event rates (P=0.0043). Cox regression analysis revealed that the presence of the deletion was associated with reduced death rate (relative risk: 0.129, 95% CI: 0.18–0.9441, P=0.044) and event rates (relative risk: 0.167, 95% CI: 0.041–0.685, P=0.012).

Conclusion {alpha}2C-Adrenoceptor deletion may be a novel, strong, and independent predictor of reduced event rates in DCM patients treated according to guidelines.

Key Words: Adrenoceptors • Dilated cardiomyopathy • Chronic heart failure


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Activation of the sympathetic nervous system is an essential mechanism to adapt cardiac function to increased demand. However, in patients with chronic heart failure, sympathetic overactivity is associated with accelerated disease progression and increased morbidity and mortality.1,2 ß-Adrenoceptor antagonists exert a beneficial long-term effect on the survival of patients with congestive heart failure.35

The activity of the sympathetic system is controlled by inhibitory pre-synaptic {alpha}2-adrenoceptors.6 They are involved in the inhibition of neurotransmitter release, regulation of blood pressure, regulation of insulin release and lipolysis, and a broad spectrum of other physiological functions.7,8 Molecular cloning has led to the identification of the three {alpha}2-adrenoceptor subtypes, {alpha}2A, {alpha}2B, and {alpha}2C.9 Two of these receptors, {alpha}2A and {alpha}2C, predominantly control norepinephrine release from sympathetic nerves as shown by studies in gene-targeted mice.7 Several functional differences were identified between pre-synaptic {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2C-receptor subtypes.7,10 In mouse atria, the {alpha}2A-subtype inhibited norepinephrine release at high stimulation frequencies, whereas the {alpha}2C-receptor operated at lower levels of sympathetic nerve activity.7 In addition, {alpha}2C-adrenoceptors are required as feedback regulators of catecholamines in adrenal chromaffine cells.11

The {alpha}-adrenergic receptors in the myocardium are required for physiological cardiac growth processes and have been shown to transmit growth signals in double-knockout mice.12 In addition, they contribute to feedback control of sympathetic transmitter release and their deletion causes increased circulating catecholamine levels, which will lead to increased ß-adrenergic stimulation, development of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis, and increased mortality from heart failure after left ventricular pressure overload.13 The clinical relevance of these findings was highlighted by the identification of a four-amino acid deletion polymorphism of the human {alpha}2C-adrenoceptor ({alpha}2CDel322–325), which was associated with decreased G-protein-coupling of this receptor variant.14 Human beings carrying this mutation may be more prone to sympathetic overstimulation than people with the fully functional {alpha}2C-adrenoceptors if ß-adrenergic receptors are unblocked. However, in the presence of ß-blockade, the effects of {alpha}-adrenoceptors on myocardial growth may dominate. The present study was undertaken to determine the effect of the {alpha}2CDel322–325 variant on mortality and event-free survival in a cohort of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) treated according to present guidelines, including a high percentage of ß-blockade and use of antibradycardiac and antitachycardiac pacemakers in almost half of the patients.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Patients
Patients were recruited from the transplant unit of the German Heart Institute from April 1994 until August 1999 through the enrolment of all eligible patients who gave informed consent. Criteria for enrolment were an age of 20–79 years and a diagnosis of DCM. All patients had been referred to the transplant unit for evaluation for heart transplantation. All patients had undergone cardiac catheterization, and diagnosis of DCM was based on exclusion of significant coronary artery disease, primary hypertensive heart disease, primary valvular disease, hypertrophic obstructive and non-obstructive cardiomyopathy, and myocarditis. All patients were accepted for transplantation and they were treated according to guidelines, including the use of ACE-inhibitors, ß-blockers whenever possible, and AICD-implantation in the case of malignant arrhythmia. Exercise testing with measurement of cardiopulmonary function by oxygen uptake (spiroergometry) was introduced as a routine procedure in 1998; therefore, data are only available in a subgroup (n=18). Patients were followed up in 3 or 6 month intervals in the transplant unit up until December 2002 or until one of the following endpoints occurred: heart transplantation, death, or implantation of LVAD. Listing with normal or high priority for transplantation was made according to the clinical condition. Implantation of an LVAD was used as bridging to transplantation if the patient's condition was judged to be deteriorating in an acutely life-threatening manner and a donor organ was not available. All patients gave informed written consent for genotyping. The rules of WHO were followed throughout the study.

Statistics
The SPSS program (version 11.5) was used for statistical analysis. Categorical data were compared by {chi}2 testing. Survival was analysed using Kaplan–Meier curves and tested by the log-rank test. To test for confounding factors, we also performed Cox regression analysis. We included in the Cox regression models the {alpha}2C polymorphism a priori and factors known to have an influence on the endpoint death or the combined endpoint death/LVAD implantation/heart transplantation (age, age at diagnosis of cardiac disease, gender, body mass index, blood pressure, NYHA classification, ejection fraction measured by echocardiography, and presence of malignant ventricular arrhythmia).

Besides all cause mortality, we used the combined endpoint (death/LVAD implantation/heart transplantation), because the occurrence of death was assumed to be frequently prevented by LVAD or urgent transplantation. The combined endpoint thus better describes the occurrence of end-stage cardiac disease.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Characterization of patients
A total of 345 patients were included in this study. Characterization of the patients is shown in Tables 13: 98.26% patients were Caucasians of central European origin and the remaining six were of Turkish origin; 16.5% were women. Patients exhibited severely impaired systolic cardiac function, as indicated by reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and ventricular dilatation (LVEDD), and increased pulmonary artery pressure (Table 1). Malignant ventricular arrhythmia defined as non-sustained or sustained VT or ventricular fibrillation was identified by 24-h ECG in about one-third of the patients.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study population at study entry
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Genotype distributions and allelic frequency of the {alpha}2CDel322 variant
 
Mean follow-up was 249 weeks (4.9 years) in event-free patients and 104 weeks (2 years) in patients with events. During follow-up, 51% of patients exhibited an event: death (18%), heart transplantation (25%), or implantation of LVAD as bridging to transplantation (7%) (Table 1).

Comparison of patients by genotype indicated that differences between deletion carriers ({alpha}2CDel322–325) and patients without deletion existed in cardiopulmonary function measured by spiroergometry (Table 2). In a subgroup that was studied by spiroergometry, deletion carriers had a significantly higher oxygen uptake and greater ventilatory efficiency (lower slope of the ratio ventilation/VCO2), indicating better cardiopulmonary function. In this subgroup, all other clinical parameters, including EF and LVEDD, did not differ significantly between {alpha}2CDel322–325 carriers and wild types (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Basic demographics and selected clinical data at study entry
 
Medical treatment and use of pacemakers
Starting at the first visit in the transplant unit, the therapy was optimized according to guidelines leading to treatment with ACEI in 99% of patients, ß-blockers in 76%, and aldosterone antagonists in 60% of patients. As a ß-blocker, the ß1-selective agent metoprolol was generally used. At presentation, 25% of patients were treated with a ß-blocker which was subsequently, if no contraindications were found, uptitrated to the highest individually possible dose, resulting in the use of >100 mg metoprolol in 55%. Arrhythmia was systematically monitored by 24-h ECG. Forty-seven per cent of the patients received a pacemaker, 15% an antibradycardia system, and 32% an antitachycardia system or defibrillator (AICD). Documented malignant arrhythmia or cardiac syncope was a prerequisite for AICD implantation. If necessary, oral treatment with amiodarone was added to the regimen.

Genotypes and allele frequencies
Patients heterozygous for {alpha}2CDel322–325 were 7.2%. No {alpha}2CDel homozygote patients were detected. The frequency of the wild-type allele was 96.38% and for {alpha}2CDel, it was 3.62%. All genotype distributions were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (Table 3).

Outcome analysis
Kaplan–Meier analysis showed survival differences with respect to the {alpha}2CDel adrenoceptor polymorphism (Figure 1A). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the presence of the {alpha}2CDel adrenoceptor variant reduced the risk for death on the waiting list for cardiac transplantation to 0.129 (95% CI 0.18–0.94). The effect of the {alpha}2CDel polymorphism on mortality was independent of age, duration of cardiac disease, gender, body mass index, blood pressure, NYHA classification, ejection fraction measured by echocardiography, and presence of malignant ventricular arrhythmia. Survival was also independently affected by left ventricular systolic function (LVEF) (Table 4, column 5).


Figure 6591
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Kaplan–Meier analysis for mortality (A) or the combined endpoint (B): death, implantation of an LVAD, or heart transplantation. Four out of 25 patients heterozygous for the deletion ({alpha}2CDel322–325) in the {alpha}2C-adrenoreceptor died, whereas 83 out of 320 patients without deletion in the {alpha}2C-adrenoreceptor died. Only 6 of 25 patients heterozygous for {alpha}2CDel322–325 reached the combined endpoint death, LVAD implantation, or heart transplantation, whereas 169 out of 320 patients without deletion in the {alpha}2C-adrenoreceptor reached the combined endpoint. Curves were compared using the log-rank test.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 Cox proportional hazards analysis of factors predicting death or the combined endpoint: death, implantation of an LVAD, or heart transplantation in our entire study population
 
Kaplan–Meier analysis for the combined endpoint death/LVAD implantation/heart transplantation likewise revealed a significant impact (P=0.044) of the {alpha}2CDel polymorphism on event-free survival (Figure 1B). Cox regression revealed that relative risk for carriers of the {alpha}2CDel adrenoceptor variant was reduced to 0.167 (95% CI: 0.041–0.685, P=0.012) (Table 4). Event-free survival was also independently affected by NYHA classification, left ventricular systolic function (LVEF), and left ventricular size (LVEDD) (Table 4, column 8).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In the present study we demonstrate for the first time that genetic variation in the {alpha}2C-adrenoceptor gene ({alpha}2CDel322–325) is independently associated with survival and absence of events in patients with severe heart failure due to dilated DCM. Statistical analysis was done for two endpoints: death and the combined endpoint of death and transplantation and implantation of an LVAD. As the occurrence of death was probably assumed to be frequently prevented by LVAD or urgent transplantation, the combined endpoint gives a more realistic estimate of the occurrence of end-stage cardiac disease.

It is generally known that the number of patients may be a potential study limitation in genetic association studies. Our cohort of advanced DCM patients represents the largest possible cohort of our centre of well-characterized DCM patients with a long follow-up. The principle findings seen in the initial Kaplan–Meier analysis remained statistically significant after consideration (by Cox regressions) of well-known confounding factors. The relevance of known independent confounders such as LVEF, NYHA class, and left ventricular size was confirmed in our study. This clearly suggests that the {alpha}2C-adrenoceptor gene ({alpha}2CDel322–325) polymorphism represents an important and independent genetic factor that determines survival in patients with advanced DCM. However, it is now well recognized that genetic association studies need confirmation in independent populations for a variety of reasons that will not be discussed here. Interested reader may refer to the work of Colhoun et al.15 We would be happy if our study could form the rationale for a larger multi-centre study. This is especially important, as the current study strongly suggests the use of the {alpha}2C-adrenoceptor gene ({alpha}2CDel322–325) polymorphism as an additional factor for the determination of the priority of patients on the waiting list for heart transplantation. Our data are thus potentially of major clinical impact.

Norepinephrine and epinephrine induce multiple actions in the cardiovascular system via six different {alpha}-adrenoceptor subtypes ({alpha}1A, {alpha}1B, {alpha}1D, {alpha}2A, {alpha}2B, {alpha}2C) and three different ß-receptor subtypes (ß1,2,3,).9 {alpha}1- and ß-Adrenoceptors may induce myocardial hypertrophy in both postnatal and adult life, depending on pathophysiological conditions. Studies in gene-targeted mice have shown that {alpha}-adrenoceptors are required for physiological growth during normal postnatal cardiac development and for an adaptive response to cardiac stress.12 In combination, {alpha}1- and ß-adrenoceptors contribute to the adaptation of heart rate and the initiation of physiological and pathophysiological cardiac hypertrophy.

Several lines of evidence support a link between the functional {alpha}2C-Del322–325 adrenoceptor variant and activation of the sympathetic nervous system. Deletion of four amino acids in the third intracellular loop of the human {alpha}2C-receptor ({alpha}2CDel322–325) leads to the impairment of G-protein-coupling when this receptor variant is expressed in cell lines in vitro.14 In mice, deletion of {alpha}-adrenoceptors impairs feedback inhibition of catecholamine release. {alpha}2C-Receptor-deficient mice had elevated circulating catecholamines after transverse aortic constriction compared with wild-type mice.13 Deficiency of {alpha}2C-receptors may thus lead to increased activation of myocardial {alpha}1- and ß-adrenoceptors. This may be responsible for initiating cardiac hypertrophy and failure if ß1-adrenoceptors are unblocked.16,17 However, if ß1-adrenoceptors are blocked, catecholamines may predominantly stimulate growth processes via {alpha}1- and ß2-adrenoceptors.

As the effect of the {alpha}2CDel polymorphism modifies the activity of the adrenergic system, it may be speculated that {alpha}2CDel patients may particularly benefit from ß-blocker treatment. In our own previous study, we observed a decreased cardiac function in Caucasian heart failure patients carrying the {alpha}2CDel polymorphism who were not treated with ß-blockers or antitachycardiac pacemakers.13,18 However, in the present study, 99% of patients were treated with ACEI and 76% received ß-blockers. More than 50% of patients reached a dose of >100 mg metoprolol. This may effectively inhibit ß1-adrenergic overstimulation. At the same time, {alpha}1- and ß2 adrenoceptors are not inhibited by metoprolol treatment. {alpha}1A/C and {alpha}1B are required for physiological cardiac hypertrophy and their deletion is associated with a worse prognosis in pressure overload.12 Thus, maintained stimulation of {alpha}1- and ß2- adrenoceptors in the presence of ß1-adrenergic blockade may be the basis for beneficial effects of {alpha}2CDel322–325 in our cohort.

In our current study, we included patients with nearly end-stage heart failure suffering from DCM and referred for heart transplantation. As only patients with advanced stages of heart failure and very low ejection fractions are considered as candidates for heart transplantation, the ejection fraction was below 30% and similar in all genotypes. However, in our previously published study the inclusion criteria were different. There, HF patients with an ejection fraction of below 55% of different aetiologies and in different stages of HF were included. Given that the {alpha}2CDel322–325 deletion acts as a survival factor in DCM patients, the deletion carriers with low EF would be expected to accumulate in such a sample, as there is a higher likelihood that patients without this deletion will die. Such a selection bias may have contributed to the results of the first study. Indeed, some clinical findings in the present study point towards a potential survival advantage for the deletion carriers. Deletion carriers had a highly significant greater maximal oxygen uptake and better ventilatory efficiency. This difference is highly significant even though only data from a subgroup are available. Thus it seems that deletion carriers have better cardiopulmonary exercise tolerance in the presence of comparable impairment of left ventricular function. However, exercise tolerance is one of the best predictors of survival. Therefore, this survival advantage in the deletion carriers may be the focus of further investigations.

Patients with DCM are susceptible to arrhythmias caused by {alpha}-adrenergic overactivation, and high-dose ß-blocker therapy may induce bradycardia. Both risks were limited in our cohort by close follow-up for arrhythmias and by medical antiarrhythmic treatment, preferentially with amiodarone and with regular use of antibradycardiac and antitachycardiac pacemakers and defibrillators. The latter were strictly used only if malignant arrhythmia was documented in the ECG, or a syncope was strongly believed to be due to arrhythmia. Therefore, the use of AICDs reflects the presence of life-threatening arrhythmia quite well. The number of malignant arrhythmia showed a trend towards lower values in the deletion carriers, but the difference did not achieve statistical significance and can therefore not contribute to a better understanding of the effect of the deletion.

For still unknown reasons, the prevalence of the {alpha}2CDel322–325 polymorphism is higher in black than in white Americans.19 Higher allele frequencies were observed in black heart failure patients (61%) in comparison with controls (41%),19 but comparable differences were not observed in Caucasians and no data are available for Turkish patients.

Interestingly, it is generally accepted that black heart failure patients respond particularly well to ß-blockers. Thus, further studies may test the hypothesis that the presence of the {alpha}2CDel322–325 is associated with a greater response to ß-blockers. We cannot confirm this hypothesis, as the number of patients treated with ß-blockers increased continuously from 25% at presentation to 76% during the study period. Indeed, ß-blockers were started in all patients without contraindications and were titrated up and continued in the highest individually acceptable dose. Thus, we cannot define meaningful and comparable ß-blocker-treated and non-ß-blocker-treated subgroups.

In conclusion, our data suggest that Caucasian patients with the {alpha}2C322–325 deletion do have a functional advantage in the presence of an equally impaired left ventricular function in comparison with the ‘wild-types’. The functional benefit was observed under intensive medical and device therapies in the present study. More data are needed to analyse the effect of this polymorphism on the clinical course of patients with DCM and its implications for therapy.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation), with grants to L.H., B.H., and V.R.Z. and by a BMBF (Federal Ministry for Education and Research) grant to V.R.Z. We thank Anne M. Gale, ELS, for editorial assistance.

Conflict of interest: none declared.


    Footnotes
 
{dagger} These authors have contributed equally. Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Cohn JN, Levine TB, Olivari MT, Garberg V, Lura D, Francis GS, Simon AB, Rector T. Plasma norepinephrine as a guide to prognosis in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 1984;311:819–823.[Abstract]
  2. Port JD, Bristow MR. Altered beta-adrenergic receptor gene regulation and signaling in chronic heart failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2001;33:887–905.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. MERIT-HF. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet. 1999;353:2001–2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. CIBIS-II. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II): a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;353:9–13.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, Colucci WS, Fowler MB, Gilbert EM, Shusterman NH. The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. U.S. Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1349–1355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Starke K, Gothert M, Kilbinger H. Modulation of neurotransmitter release by presynaptic autoreceptors. Physiol Rev 1989;69:864–989.[Free Full Text]
  7. Hein L, Altman JD, Kobilka BK. Two functionally distinct alpha2-adrenergic receptors regulate sympathetic neurotransmission. Nature 1999;402:181–184.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Hein L. Transgenic models of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor subtype function. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 2001;142:161–185.[Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Bylund DB, Eikenberg DC, Hieble JP, Langer SZ, Lefkowitz RJ, Minneman KP, Molinoff PB, Ruffolo RR Jr, Trendelenburg U. International Union of Pharmacology nomenclature of adrenoceptors. Pharmacol Rev 1994;46:121–136.[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Bunemann M, Bucheler MM, Philipp M, Lohse MJ, Hein L. Activation and deactivation kinetics of alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-adrenergic receptor-activated G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channel currents. J Biol Chem 2001;276:47512–47517. Published online ahead of print October 8, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Brede M, Nagy G, Philipp M, Sorensen JB, Lohse MJ, Hein L. Differential control of adrenal and sympathetic catecholamine release by alpha 2-adrenoceptor subtypes. Mol Endocrinol 2003;17:1640–1646. Published online ahead of print May 22, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. O'Connell TD, Ishizaka S, Nakamura A, Swigart PM, Rodrigo MC, Simpson GL, Cotecchia S, Rokosh DG, Grossman W, Foster E, Simpson PC. The alpha(1A/C)- and alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptors are required for physiological cardiac hypertrophy in the double-knockout mouse. J Clin Invest 2003;111:1783–1791.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Brede M, Wiesmann F, Jahns R, Hadamek K, Arnolt C, Neubauer S, Lohse MJ, Hein L. Feedback inhibition of catecholamine release by two different alpha2-adrenoceptor subtypes prevents progression of heart failure. Circulation 2002;106:2491–2496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Small KM, Forbes SL, Rahman FF, Bridges KM, Liggett SB. A four amino acid deletion polymorphism in the third intracellular loop of the human alpha 2C-adrenergic receptor confers impaired coupling to multiple effectors. J Biol Chem 2000;275:23059–23064.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Colhoun HM, McKeigue PM, Davey Smith G. Problems of reporting genetic associations with complex outcomes. Lancet. 2003;361:865–872.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Engelhardt S, Hein L, Wiesmann F, Lohse MJ. Progressive hypertrophy and heart failure in beta1-adrenergic receptor transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 999;96:7059–7064.
  17. Engelhardt S, Boknik P, Keller U, Neumann J, Lohse MJ, Hein L. Early impairment of calcium handling and altered expression of junctin in hearts of mice overexpressing the beta1-adrenergic receptor. FASEB J 2001;15:2718–2720. Published online ahead of print October 15, 2001.[Free Full Text]
  18. Jahns R, Boivin V, Siegmund C, Inselmann G, Lohse MJ, Boege F. Autoantibodies activating human beta1-adrenergic receptors are associated with reduced cardiac function in chronic heart failure. Circulation 1999;99:649–654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Small KM, Wagoner LE, Levin AM, Kardia SL, Liggett SB. Synergistic polymorphisms of beta1- and alpha2C-adrenergic receptors and the risk of congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1135–1142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kleber FX, Vietzke G, Wernecke KD, Bauer U, Opitz C, Wensel R, Sperfeld A, Glaser S. Impairment of ventilatory efficiency in heart failure: prognostic impact. Circulation 2000;101:2803–2809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
F. Friedrichs, C. Zugck, G.-J. Rauch, B. Ivandic, D. Weichenhan, M. Muller-Bardorff, B. Meder, N. E. El Mokhtari, V. Regitz-Zagrosek, R. Hetzer, et al.
HBEGF, SRA1, and IK: Three cosegregating genes as determinants of cardiomyopathy
Genome Res., March 1, 2009; 19(3): 395 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
R. Gilsbach, M. Brede, N. Beetz, E. Moura, V. Muthig, C. Gerstner, F. Barreto, S. Neubauer, M. A. Vieira-Coelho, and L. Hein
Heterozygous {alpha}2C-adrenoceptor-deficient mice develop heart failure after transverse aortic constriction
Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2007; 75(4): 728 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/4/454    most recent
ehi659v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Regitz-Zagrosek, V.
Right arrow Articles by Hein, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Regitz-Zagrosek, V.
Right arrow Articles by Hein, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?