European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on March 28, 2006
European Heart Journal 2006 27(9):1010-1012; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi851
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P2Y12 receptor antagonists: a rapidly expanding group of antiplatelet agents
Unità di Ematologia e Trombosi, Ospedale San Paolo—Università di Milano, Via di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milano, Italy
* Corresponding author. Tel/fax: +39 0250323095. E-mail address: marco.cattaneo{at}unimi.it
This editorial refers to ‘Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the oral reversible P2Y12 antagonist AZD6140 with aspirin in patients with atherosclerosis: a double-blind comparison to clopidogrel with aspirin’
by S. Husted et al., on page 1038
Adenosine-5'-diphosphate (ADP) plays a key role in platelet function, because, although ADP itself is a weak platelet agonist, when secreted from the platelet dense granules where it is stored, it amplifies the platelet responses induced by other platelet agonists.1 The transduction of the ADP signal involves both a transient rise in free cytoplasmic calcium mediated by the Gq-coupled P2Y1 receptor, and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase mediated by the Gi-coupled P2Y12 receptor. Concomitant activation of both the Gq and Gi pathways by ADP is necessary to elicit normal ADP-induced platelet aggregation. Activation of the Gq pathway through P2Y1 leads to platelet shape change and rapidly reversible aggregation, whereas the activation of the Gi pathway through P2Y12 elicits a slow progressive and sustained platelet aggregation not preceded by shape change. In addition to its role in ADP-induced platelet aggregation, P2Y12 mediates the potentiation of platelet secretion induced by strong agonists and the stabilization of thrombin-induced platelet aggregates.1 P2Y12 has a more selective tissue distribution than P2Y1, making it an attractive molecular target for therapeutic intervention. Indeed, P2Y12 is the target of efficacious antithrombotic agents like ticlopidine and clopidogrel, which are already used in clinical practice either alone or in combination with other antithrombotic drugs.2
Ticlopidine and clopidogrel are structurally related compounds, belonging to the thienopyridine family of ADP receptor antagonists; they are pro-drugs that are inactive in vitro and need to be metabolized in vivo by the hepatic cytochrome P-450 1A enzymatic pathway to active metabolites, which have very short half-lives. They irreversibly and specifically inhibit the function of the platelet P2Y12 receptor, reproducing the platelet function abnormalities that are observed in patients who are congenitally deficient in P2Y12 and in P2Y12 knock-out mice.1,2 The ability of thienopyridines to inhibit platelet aggregation induced by several platelet agonists (such as thromboxane A2 analogues, collagen, and low concentrations of thrombin) is accounted for by the suppression of the amplifying effect on platelet aggregation of ADP secreted from platelet dense granules. Treatment with these thienopyridines renders the thrombin-induced platelet aggregates more susceptible to deaggregation and inhibits shear-induced platelet aggregation.
The use of ticlopidine and clopidogrel in the clinical setting, despite their proven antithrombotic activity, has some drawbacks. (i) The need for their metabolism to active metabolites accounts for their delayed antiplatelet effects: a maximum plateau of inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation is observed 4–5 days after daily oral administration of 500 mg ticlopidine or 75 mg clopidogrel.2 It should be noted, however, that the delayed onset of action of clopidogrel can be reduced to about 2–5 h by a loading dose of 300–600 mg.2 (ii) As a consequence of the irreversible inhibition of P2Y12 function, the inhibitory effect of thienopyridines on circulating platelets lasts for approximately 10 days, which corresponds to the lifespan of a circulating platelet. Although the ability of thienopyridines to inhibit irreversibly P2Y12 with their short-lived metabolites has theoretical advantages,3 it may represent a problem for patients who need to undergo coronary bypass surgery, because treatment with clopidogrel within 4–5 days of the procedure is associated with increased blood loss, reoperation for bleeding, increased transfusion requirements, and prolonged intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. (iii) Finally, there is a substantial inter-individual variability in platelet inhibition by ticlopidine and clopidogrel, which is mostly because of the inter-individual differences to the extent of metabolism of the pro-drug to the active metabolite.4 Preliminary, small-sized studies demonstrated an association between insufficient platelet function inhibition by clopidogrel and heightened incidence of vascular events. Increasing the dose of clopidogrel might reduce the number of poor responders. However, the safety issues should caution against this policy, as severe toxic effects of the drug such as bone marrow aplasia and microangiopathic thrombocytopenia, which might be dose-dependent, have been described,2 albeit less frequently that with ticlopidine. The above limitations of ticlopidine and clopidogrel have fostered the search for new P2Y12 antagonists.
Prasugrel is a new thienopyridine compound with a much faster onset of action than clopidogrel.5 In a cross-over study, it has been demonstrated that a 60 mg loading dose prasugrel provided rapid and high-grade, irreversible inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation even in those subjects who responded poorly to a standard loading dose of clopidogrel.5 The higher potency of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel probably reflects more efficient conversion of the pro-drug to the active metabolite. Prasugrel has proven safe in a Phase II trial6 and is currently undergoing Phase III evaluation (TRITON TIMI-38 trial) in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI. This study will determine whether or not the more rapid and potent platelet inhibition achievable with prasugrel provides superior benefit over the approved dose of clopidogrel in a safe and tolerable fashion.
In some clinical situations, inhibition of platelet aggregation by fast-acting and reversible antagonists with a short half-life might be preferable to irreversible inhibitors.7 Cangrelor is a selective and reversible direct inhibitor of P2Y12.8 In a study that directly compared the effects of clopidogrel and cangrelor administration in patients with ischaemic heart disease, cangrelor infusion at 2 and 4 µg/mL/min resulted in near-complete inhibition of platelet aggregation measured at 4 min after the addition of 10 µM ADP, whereas 4 to 7 days clopidogrel treatment resulted in only approximately 60% inhibition.8 The short half-life of the molecule (2.6 min) results in a rapid reversal of its platelet inhibitory effect. Addition of cangrelor in vitro to blood from the clopidogrel-treated patients resulted in near complete inhibition of P2Y12-dependent platelet function.8 It must be noted, however, that cangrelor can only be given intravenuously, which limits its use in the clinical practice.
Husted et al.8 report on the effects of the oral administration to patients with atherosclerosis of AZD6140, the first oral reversible P2Y12 antagonist that fills up the last gap in P2Y12 pharmacopeia. AZD6140 belongs to the same family as cangrelor of stable ATP analogues with high affinity for P2Y12.8 Efforts to find compounds for oral administration led to the discovery of ARC109318XX, the first selective and stable, non-phosphate, competitive P2Y12 antagonist; further refinement to increase the oral bio-availability led to the synthesis of AZD6140.9 The compound does not need metabolic activation to exert its inhibitory effect; however, it is metabolized to an active metabolite, which is thought to contribute to its antiplatelet effects after oral administration. In a model of cyclic flow reductions in the femoral artery of anaesthetized male beagles, AZD6140 displayed a good separation between the antithrombotic effect and the prolongation of the tongue bleeding time that was intermediate between that of cangrelor and clopidogrel.9 In preliminary studies on healthy volunteers, the compound displayed linear pharmacokynetics, induced a strong and rapid inhibition of platelet aggregation which decreased substantially over the 24 h post-dose, and was well tolerated.10
The study by Husted et al. randomized in a double-blind fashion 200 stable atherosclerotic outpatients, who were on treatment with aspirin 75–100 mg once daily, to AZD6140 (50 mg BID, 100 mg BID, 200 mg BID, or 400 mg once daily) or clopidogrel 75 mg once daily for 28 days. The study showed that AZD6140 at doses above 50 mg BID more effectively inhibited platelet aggregation and with less variability than clopidogrel. In addition, the inhibition of platelet aggregation by AZD6140 was very rapid (2 h post-dose, 96±6.1% for 400 mg once daily) compared with that of clopidogrel. The prolongation of the bleeding times was greater in AZD6140-treated patients compared with clopidogrel-treated patients, although no obvious dose-response relationship was observed. The incidence of bleeding events tended to be higher in patients treated with the three higher doses of AZD6140, compared with that observed in patients treated with 50 mg BID or clopidogrel. One major bleeding event was observed in a patient on treatment with 400 mg QD AZD6140. Perhaps of more concern than the higher incidence of bleeding complications, which can be predicted for treatments that very effectively inhibit platelet function, was the unexpected, relatively high frequency of dyspnoea, which appeared to increase with increasing doses of AZD6140 (10% with 50 mg or 100 mg BID, 16% with 200 mg BID, and 20% with 400 mg QD). Further studies are necessary to assess the real frequency and clinical relevance of this side effect of the compound. AZD6140 is undergoing Phase III evaluation that will address the issues of its efficacy and safety.
In conclusion, the pharmacopeia of drugs inhibiting the platelet P2Y12 receptor for ADP is rapidly expanding. In addition to ticlopidine and clopidogrel, well-known compounds of proven antithrombotic efficacy, a new thienopyridine, prasugrel that is characterized by higher potency and faster onset of action, is currently under clinical evaluation. Two direct and reversible P2Y12 antagonists, cangrelor, which can only be given intravenously, and AZD6140, which can be given orally, have rapid onset and reversal of platelet inhibition, which make them attractive alternatives to thienopyridines, especially when rapid inhibition of platelet aggregation or its quick reversal are required. Therefore, in the near future, physicians will have a panel of different P2Y12 inhibitors to choose from, which will enable them to tailor the most appropriate antithrombotic therapy to the individual patient and risk situation.
Conflict of interest: M.C. received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca for development of AZD6140 and one consultancy fee from Lilly for development of Prasugrel.
Footnotes
The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of the European Heart Journal or of the European Society of Cardiology.
doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi754 
References
- Cattaneo M. The platelet P2 receptors. In: Michelson AD, ed. Platelets. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2006, in press.
- Cattaneo M. ADP receptors antagonists. In: Michelson AD, ed. Platelets. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2006, in press.
- Patrono C, Bachmann F, Baigent C, Bode C, De Caterina R, Charbonnier B, Fitzgerald D, Hirsh J, Husted S, Kvasnicka J, Montalescot G, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Verheugt F, Vermylen J, Wallentin L, Priori SG, Alonso Garcia MA, Blanc JJ, Budaj A, Cowie M, Dean V, Deckers J, Fernandez Burgos E, Lekakis J, Lindahl B, Mazzotta G, Morais J, Oto A, Smiseth OA, Morais J, Deckers J, Ferreira R, Mazzotta G, Steg PG, Teixeira F, Wilcox R. European Society of Cardiology. Expert consensus document on the use of antiplatelet agents. The task force on the use of antiplatelet agents in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease of the European society of cardiology. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 166–181.
[Free Full Text] - Cattaneo M. Aspirin and clopidogrel. Efficacy, safety and the issue of drug resistance. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004; 24: 1980–1987.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Niitsu Y, Jakubowski JA, Sugidachi A, Asai F. Pharmacology of CS-747 (Prasugrel, LY640315), a novel, potent antiplatelet agent with in vivo P2Y12 receptor antagonist activity. Semin Thromb Hemost 2005; 31: 184–194.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Wiviott SD, Antman EM, Winters KJ, Weerakkody G, Murphy SA, Behounek BD, Carney RJ, Lazzam C, McKay RG, McCabe CH, Braunwald E; JUMBO-TIMI 26 Investigators. Randomized comparison of prasugrel (CS-747, LY640315), a novel thienopyridine P2Y12 antagonist, with clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the joint utilization of medications to block platelets optimally (JUMBO)-TIMI 26 trial. Circulation 2005; 111: 3366–3373.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Nurden AT, Nurden P. Advantages of fast-acting ADP receptor blockade in ischemic heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003; 23: 158–159.
[Free Full Text] - Husted S, Emanuelsson H, Heptinstall S, Sandset PM, Wickens M, Peters G. Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the oral reversible P2Y12 antagonist AZD6140 with aspirin in patients with atherosclerosis: a double-blind comparison to clopidogrel with aspirin. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 1038–1047. First published on February 13, 2006, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi754.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - van Giezen JJJ, Humphries RG. Preclinical and clinical studies with selective reversible direct P2Y12 antagonists. Semin Thromb Hemost 2005; 31: 195–204.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Peters G, Robbie G. Single-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of AZD6140, an oral reversible ADP receptor antagonist. Haematologica 2004; 89(Suppl. 7): 14.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in EHJ:
- Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the oral reversible P2Y12 antagonist AZD6140 with aspirin in patients with atherosclerosis: a double-blind comparison to clopidogrel with aspirin
- Steen Husted, Håkan Emanuelsson, Stan Heptinstall, Per Morten Sandset, Mark Wickens, and Gary Peters
EHJ 2006 27: 1038-1047.[Abstract] [FREE Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J.-P. Collet and G. Montalescot Review: Platelet Function Testing and Implications for Clinical Practice Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, September 1, 2009; 14(3): 157 - 169. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Van de Werf New antithrombotic agents: are they needed and what can they offer to patients with a non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome? Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2009; 30(14): 1695 - 1702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. T. Newsome, R. S. Weller, J. C. Gerancher, M. A. Kutcher, and R. L. Royster Coronary Artery Stents: II. Perioperative Considerations and Management Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 570 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||