European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on July 20, 2007
European Heart Journal 2007 28(16):2028-2040; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm296
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management of cardiovascular risk in the peri-menopausal woman: a consensus statement of European cardiologists and gynaecologists
1 NHLI, Imperial College London, Royal Brompton Hospital, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY, UK
2 Centre for Clinical and Basic Science, San Raffaele-Roma, Rome, Italy
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St John's Hospital, Limerick, Ireland
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
5 Department of Endocrinology, Reproductive Medicine and Osteoporosis, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
6 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
7 Instituto Palacios of Woman's Health, Madrid, Spain
8 Clinical Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
9 Department of Pharmacology, Saint-Antoine, Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France
10 Department of Cardiology, IRCCS, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
Received 10 October 2006; revised 30 May 2007; accepted 14 June 2007; online publish-ahead-of-print 20 July 2007.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +44 20 7351 8112; fax: +44 20 7823 3392. E-mail address: peter.collins{at}imperial.ac.uk
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Top
Abstract
IntroductionCardiovascular risk is poorly managed in women, especially during the menopausal transition when susceptibility to cardiovascular events increases. Clear gender differences exist in the epidemiology, symptoms, diagnosis, progression, prognosis, and management of cardiovascular risk. Key risk factors that need to be controlled in the peri-menopausal woman are hypertension, dyslipidaemia, obesity, and other components of the metabolic syndrome, with the avoidance and careful control of diabetes. Hypertension is a particularly powerful risk factor and lowering of blood pressure is pivotal. Hormone replacement therapy is acknowledged as the gold standard for the alleviation of the distressing vasomotor symptoms of the menopause, but the findings of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study generated concern for the detrimental effect on cardiovascular events. Thus, hormone replacement therapy cannot be recommended for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Whether the findings of WHI in older post-menopausal women can be applied to younger peri-menopausal women is unknown. It is increasingly recognized that hormone therapy is inappropriate for older post-menopausal women no longer displaying menopausal symptoms. Both gynaecologists and cardiovascular physicians have an important role to play in identifying peri-menopausal women at risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and should work as a team to identify and manage risk factors such as hypertension.
Key Words: Cardiology • Cardiovascular prevention • Cardiovascular risk • Gynaecology • Hormones • Hypertension • Menopause • Metabolic syndrome
|
Introduction |
|---|
Cardiovascular disease is often regarded as a problem that only men face. Most women do not perceive cardiovascular disease as an important health concern and report that they are not well informed about their risk.1 The medical profession is equally at fault: primary-care physicians, gynaecologists, and cardiovascular physicians often fail to identify cardiovascular risk factors and underdiagnose and undertreat women with cardiovascular risk.2 This is despite the fact that, over their lifespan, women are more likely to experience cardiovascular disease and disability than men and will require intervention to improve survival.
In Europe, 55% of women will die of cardiovascular disease as opposed to 43% of men.3 Coronary heart disease (CHD) accounts for 23% of deaths in women, stroke for a further 18% and other cardiovascular disease for 15%.3 By comparison, in men, CHD is responsible for 21% of deaths, stroke for 11% and other cardiovascular disease for 11%.3 Many women have a great fear of cancer and identify breast cancer as a leading cause of death,1 although in reality breast cancer is responsible for only 3% of female deaths (Table 1),3 but is a considerable cause of morbidity.
|
The mission of the European Society of Cardiology is to improve the quality of life in the European population by reducing the impact of cardiovascular disease. The Society has recognized scientific gaps in our understanding of cardiovascular disease in women and has instigated its ‘Women at Heart’ programme.4 The aim is to increase the awareness of cardiovascular disease in women, with the education of the general population as well as the medical and scientific community. As part of this programme, a meeting was conducted to build an expert opinion on the interdisciplinary treatment algorithm for menopausal women with climacteric symptoms, with particular emphasis on management of cardiovascular risk factors. This also met the recently identified need by gynaecologists for a consensus on cardiovascular risk in the menopause, with true dialogue between all parties concerned.5 Furthermore, a recent Position Statement by the Executive Committee of the International Menopause Society stressed the importance of clinical research to improve clinical practice.6 In particular, the International Menopause Society supports the expansion of research into the effects of hormones on the cardiovascular system.
|
Gender differences in epidemiology of cardiovascular disease |
|---|
Epidemiology, symptoms, and progression of cardiovascular disease are different in women than in men. Typically, women are about 10 years older than men when they develop cardiovascular disease.7 Although cardiovascular events are a rare occurrence in pre-menopausal women, their incidence increases most markedly after the age of 45–54 years (i.e. at the time of the menopause). Overall, there has been a decline in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in developed countries in recent years due to the promotion of primary prevention.8 Despite an encouraging fall in age-adjusted cardiovascular mortality in men, there has been a gradual increase in the incidence of cardiovascular events in women.9 Furthermore, the prognosis of cardiovascular disease may differ with regard to gender. For example, the 1-year mortality after myocardial infarction is higher in women,10 whereas in congestive heart failure the prognosis is better in women than in men.11
Marked gender differences also exist in the pattern of stable angina, the most common manifestation of CHD. New cases of angina pectoris as an initial presentation are more common in women, with the incidence of uncomplicated angina in women equal to and, after the menopause, even exceeding that in men.12,13 Men are more likely to present with an acute event, either myocardial infarction or sudden death, as the initial presentation, of coronary disease in all age groups. After the menopause, the incidence of myocardial infarction in women also increases, although absolute rates remain lower than in men until the eighth decade. Angina is often regarded as benign in women, but despite normal or non-obstructive coronary disease, the morbidity is high.14
Practice point 1. Increases in the incidence of cardiovascular morbidity in women, in particular myocardial infarction and angina pectoris, coincide with the menopause.
Gender differences in risk factors for cardiovascular disease
Risk factors can be defined as non-modifiable and modifiable (Table 2). The three key non-modifiable factors are age, gender, and family history. One of the mechanisms of the gender difference between younger men and pre-menopausal women in the incidence of cardiovascular disease may be explained by the cardioprotective effect of endogenous oestrogen. Low plasma oestrogen levels may explain some of the unfavourable lipid and carbohydrate metabolism changes rapidly occurring during menopausal transition and soon after menopause.15 Similar changes are observed in women with premature ovarian failure with a mean age of 31 years and in those during natural menopausal transition with a mean age of 52.15
|
The presence of hypertension mirrors the prevalence of cardiovascular disease, with increases in prevalence in women after the menopause.16 Hypertension is a powerful risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Between the ages of 40 and 69 years, each difference in usual systolic blood pressure of 20 mmHg is associated with a two-fold difference in the rate of death from stroke, ischaemic heart disease, and other vascular causes.17
Cigarette smoking and oral contraception
Cigarettes have been identified as an important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Men have traditionally been more likely to smoke, but the once wide gender gap in smoking prevalence narrowed in the mid-1980s and has since remained fairly constant.18 The risks associated with smoking, measured by both current and accumulated tobacco exposure, are consistently higher in women than in men and are not age-dependent.19
Combined smoking and oral contraceptive use can increase the number of cases of myocardial infarction occurring among women aged over 35.20 However, regardless of oral contraceptive use, smoking accounts for most of the excess cases.21 The increased risk of thrombogenesis associated with smoking appears to be affected through increased platelet aggregation and degenerative changes in the vascular endothelium.22–24 Among women using oral contraceptives containing less than 35 µg ethinyloestradiol, there was a significant increase in levels of fibrinogen and fibrinopeptide A in both smokers and non-smokers.24 Unlike non-smokers, women who smoke do not have a compensatory increase in antithrombin III activity, leaving the procoagulant effects of oral contraceptives unopposed.25 Thus, current or prior combined oral contraceptive use is not associated with a greatly increased risk of myocardial infarction in healthy non-smokers.26 Despite the small risk of oral contraceptives causing myocardial infarction in non-smokers, caution should be observed when prescribing them to smokers over 34 years of age and specifically to smokers over 39 years old.27
The use of oral contraception is also associated with an increased risk of ischaemic stroke, especially in heavy smokers, but the increased risk has to be considered within the context of the very low absolute risk of cardiovascular disease in this population. In a British study, for example, it was observed that 5880 women needed to take oral contraceptives for 1 year to result in one extra stroke.28
Dyslipidaemia
Dyslipidaemia is another important modifiable risk factor for CHD. Serum cholesterol is a significant risk factor for myocardial infarction for both men and women, the relative risk being similar and increasing with age.29 Lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol until recently has been the primary objective in cardiovascular disease prevention.30 It has now been demonstrated that plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels inversely correlate with the incidence of cardiovascular disease;31 hence, elevated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels confer cardioprotection. In contrast, triglyceride risk is significantly higher for women and decreases with age.29
Diabetes mellitus
The prevalence of diabetes increases sharply with increasing age and is higher in older women than in older men.32 High testosterone levels in women increase the likelihood of diabetes, whereas the risk is lowered in men.33 Also, women with gestational diabetes are more likely to develop diabetes in later life.34 Diabetes substantially increases the risk of cardiovascular disease.35 Furthermore, individuals with a 2 h plasma glucose of 10.01–11.09 mmol/L have cardiovascular mortality risks similar to those with diabetes.36 The European Heart Survey of Acute Coronary Events found that women with diabetes were more likely to have ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction than other women presenting with acute coronary symptoms and had a high incidence of hospital mortality.37 Although the EUROASPIRE study based on data from 4437 patients with CHD shows that the prevalence of known diabetes, newly diagnosed diabetes, or impaired fasting glucose is similar in men (46%) and women (47%),38 the relative risk of death from CHD and non-fatal myocardial infarction attributable to diabetes is greater in women.39,40 A recent meta-analysis of 22 studies found that the relative risk for fatal CHD associated with diabetes is 50% higher in women.39
Adiposity
Adiposity is a powerful predictor of cardiovascular death, with the relative risk increasing with body mass index.41 EUROASPIRE also reveals that obesity and central obesity (defined as a waist measurement of more than 88 cm in women and more than 102 cm in men) is more prevalent in females (70%) than in males (46%) with CHD.42 Central adiposity is associated with the menopausal transition.43 Even modest weight gain during adulthood, independent of physical activity, is associated with a higher risk of death in women; a body mass index of greater than 25 kg/m2 and less than 3.5 h of exercise per week accounts for 59% of cardiovascular deaths.44
Metabolic syndrome
The metabolic syndrome is a clustering of risk factors for atherosclerotic disease and type 2 diabetes that include central obesity, impaired glucose regulation (i.e. glucose intolerance/insulin resistance), elevated triglyceride levels, reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and hypertension. The coexistence of three or more of these factors constitutes the syndrome and increases the probability of developing diabetes mellitus, as well as increasing the risk of coronary and cardiovascular mortality. A number of definitions of metabolic syndrome exist (Table 3), including those of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF),45 American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute,46 and National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATPIII).47
|
On the basis of the NCEP-ATPIII and IDF definitions, EUROASPIRE found that 56 and 72% of women, respectively, surveyed had metabolic syndrome as opposed to 40 and 59%, respectively, of men.42 Most notably, the prevalence of obesity is higher and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels are lower in women. Also, with ageing, levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) become higher in women than in men.48 Sympathetic overactivity and increases in inflammation with ageing in women appear to be related to the increased prevalence of the metabolic syndrome.49 Pre-eclampsia is an additional risk factor for metabolic syndrome,50 and pre-eclampsia significantly increases the risk of subsequent coronary artery disease.51
Physical inactivity
Sedantarism, defined as expending less than 10% of the daily energy intake in the performance of moderate- and high-intensity activities,52 is highly prevalent in middle-aged women.53 Physical inactivity is a well-recognized contributory factor and increase in body mass index is an additive risk factor for CHD, especially in women. Sedentarism, which is often combined with depression, is an important contributory factor to CHD.54
Practice point 2. Hypertension, smoking, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, body mass index, physical inactivity, and metabolic syndrome are all powerful predictors of cardiovascular events. The cardiovascular risk associated with hypertension, triglyceridaemia, and diabetes increases in women following menopause and with increasing age.
|
The menopause and resulting medical needs |
|---|
The female population is ageing. In European countries, women have long been known to outlive men.55 Western European data for 2002 reveal that, for every 100 women aged
60, there were only about 70 men.56 At the end of the 20th century, the situation was less favourable in developing countries: throughout Latin America, Africa and the southern half of Asia less than 10% of women reached the age of 60.57 However, the future is more promising: during 2006, even in the poorest countries, women started outliving men.55 By 2050, life expectancy is set to improve greatly worldwide, more than 30% of the female population being 60 years of age or older.57 Consequently, many more women will experience the menopausal transition. As age at menopause is not changing significantly, women in the future can soon expect to be post-menopausal for 30–40% of their lives.
Loss of ovarian function
The loss of ovarian follicular activity due to falling follicle-stimulating hormone levels explains the decline in oestrogen production at menopause.58 These hormonal changes impact on the neuroendocrine system, resulting in hot flushes, night sweats, insomnia, mood changes, anxiety, irritability, and poor memory and concentration.59 The urogenital tract is also affected, with genital atrophy and, as a consequence, may result in incontinence and dyspareunia. These features lead many women to seek medical help, but many are unaware of long-term implications. Management of cardiovascular disease places heavy demands on medical resources. Similarly, the medical and socioeconomic impact of osteoporosis is enormous, being responsible in the USA alone for 700 000 bone fractures each year, of which 300 000 are femoral neck (hip) fractures.60 Cognitive decline may also be accelerated after the menopause due to oestrogen deficiency, and Alzheimer's disease is two to three times more common in women than in men.61
Menopausal symptoms
One of the most frequent, and most disturbing, symptoms reported by peri-menopausal women is hot flushes/night sweats, usually being most severe 6–12 months after the last menses.62 However, hot flushes may persist for many years in some women.62–64 Hormone replacement therapy rapidly reduces the intensity and severity of these flushes.65 Oestrogen replacement is still the most reliable and effective therapy for vasomotor symptoms. Alternatives to hormone replacement therapy, such as soy isoflavones, appear to be of little benefit for hot flushes and other vasomotor symptoms.66
Post-menopausal women report that their quality of life has declined due to physical symptoms and increased anxiety and depression.67 An improved quality of life rating can be achieved with hormone replacement therapy.68 Short-term hormone replacement therapy has been shown to increase quality-adjusted life expectancy for women with menopausal symptoms.69 In the longer term, osteoporosis is an important factor contributing to poor health-related quality of life in post-menopausal women.70 The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) has demonstrated that hormone replacement therapy significantly reduced the overall incidence of fractures and of vertebral and hip fractures even in an unselected patient population.71
Specific recommendations on the duration of hormone replacement therapy should be based on the patient characteristics and the dose and type of replacement therapy used. After the WHI publication,71 the Position Statement by the Executive Committee of the International Menopause Society stated that there are no new reasons to place mandatory limitations on the length of therapy.6 It was considered that there was no justification for the arbitrary cessation in women who started replacement during the menopausal transition and remain symptom-free while on hormones.
Practice point 3. Oestrogen deficiency associated with the menopausal transition leads to many distressing vasomotor symptoms, including hot flushes and night sweats, sexual disorders and, in the long term, osteoporosis. All these symptoms negatively impact on quality of life. An improved quality of life is achievable with hormone replacement therapy due to the alleviation of troublesome menopausal symptoms.
Menopause as a cardiovascular risk factor
The annual incidence of cardiovascular disease varies according to menopausal status.72 Weight gain frequently occurs in peri-menopausal women not receiving hormone replacement therapy.73 This is mainly attributed to an increase in body fat, which is concentrated in the abdomen (android) rather than subcutaneously (gynoid). Increased body mass index tends to reduce insulin sensitivity and increase systolic blood pressure, especially in women.74 The decline in serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and the increase in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels is an important contributor to increased CHD.75 Increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure coincide with the menopause.16 Elevated systolic blood pressure is now considered a more important predictor of cardiovascular events than diastolic blood pressure.76 Furthermore, a mild degree of insulin resistance is present in post-menopausal women not receiving hormone replacement therapy, leading to increased plasma glucose levels.77 As well as addressing oestrogen deficiency, attention should focus on the treatment of hypertension, lipid imbalance, and glucose intolerance to minimize the cardiovascular risk in post-menopausal women.
Practice point 4. Hormonal changes at the menopausal transition result in changes in the individual components of the metabolic syndrome and increase the likelihood of diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
|
The role of hormone replacement therapy |
|---|
A number of hormone preparations are available (Table 4). The type, dose, and mode of administration of exogenous sex hormones may vary their physiological actions. The recent findings that transdermal oestrogens, in contrast to oral preparations, do not seem to be associated with increased risk of venous thrombosis are interesting and challenging.78,79 This is based on the observation that oral, unlike transdermal, preparations containing oestradiol are associated with a marked and rapid increase in C-reactive protein.79 Overall, hormone replacement therapy helps to maintain quality of life and, in the long term, can also have beneficial effects on the skeletal system and curtail osteoporosis.6
|
There has recently been confusion regarding the effect of hormone replacement therapy on the long-term risk of breast cancer. Data on breast cancer risk and hormone replacement therapy collected in the WHI confirm a possible link of long-term use and an increased risk,80 and therefore this issue should be carefully evaluated and discussed with the woman before prescribing hormone replacement therapy. The conjugated equine oestrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate arm of the WHI randomized study showed that the hazard ratio (HR) for breast cancer in the overall patient population was 1.24 (95% CI 1.01–1.54).80 The increased risk attributed to continuous combined hormone replacement therapy was comparable to that due to being overweight/obese or consuming alcohol.81 However, the absolute risk for invasive breast cancer in the combination hormone replacement therapy arm was of the order of less than one case per 1000 women-years.80 Interestingly, there was no risk for women who never used hormones prior to the study and in those aged <60. In other words, the WHI trial clearly demonstrates that the short- to medium-term hormone replacement therapy for up to 5 years does not induce a detectable increase in breast-cancer risk.
The WHI clearly demonstrates that not all hormone replacement therapies can be considered equal regarding the possible effects on breast cancer. In fact, in a hysterectomized woman treated for up to 9 years only with oral equine-conjugated oestrogen, the incidence of breast cancer displayed a non-significant decrease: compared with placebo, oral equine-conjugated oestrogen resulted in an HR of 0.80 (95% CI 0.62–1.04) for breast cancer.82 Thus, oestrogen alone does not appear to increase significantly the risk of breast cancer in post-menopausal women. Considering adherence-adjusted analyses that censored follow-up 6 months after a woman became non-adherent, a larger and significant reduction in the incidence of invasive breast cancer was observed in the equine-conjugated group compared with the placebo group (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.47–0.97; P < 0.03).82 In addition, the Nurses' Health Study confirms that oestrogen-only replacement is associated with no increase in breast-cancer risk in short-term users, but in very long-term users risk was elevated.83 The multivariate relative risks and 95% CIs for breast cancer with the current use of unopposed oestrogen for <5, 5–9.9, 10–14.9, 15–19.9, and 20 years were 0.96 (0.75–1.22), 0.90 (0.72–1.12), 1.06 (0.87–1.30), 1.18 (0.95–1.48), and 1.42 (1.13–1.77) (P-value for trend <0.001). Therefore, breast cancer may not be an issue in women suffering from climacteric symptoms after hysterectomy if in receipt of oestrogen-only therapy.
Practice point 5. Use of hormone replacement therapy in the peri-menopausal woman reduces vasomotor symptoms and maintains quality of life. There is no conclusive evidence that such treatment increases the risk of breast cancer.
|
Cardiovascular effects of hormone replacement therapy |
|---|
Data from observational studies have suggested that hormone replacement therapy may enhance survival in women after coronary artery bypass grafting84 and myocardial infarction.85 Other potentially favourable actions of oestrogens include significant increases in high-density lipoprotein and decreases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in post-menopausal women with accompanying favourable effects on the coagulation profile.86 With regard to added progestins for uterine protection in non-hysterectomized women, it appears that potential cardiovascular benefits of post-menopausal oestrogen treatment can be attenuated by medroxyprogesterone acetate, but possibly not by other progestins.87 Medroxyprogesterone acetate has been shown to overcome the vasodilatory effect of oestrogens on coronary arteries, increase the progression of coronary artery atherosclerosis, accelerate the low-density lipoprotein uptake in plaque, increase the thrombogenic potential of atherosclerotic plaques, and promote insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia.87
Observational studies have suggested a cardiovascular benefit of hormone therapy. However, randomized clinical trials such as the WHI study, which enrolled women without known CHD, demonstrated that oestrogen plus progestin did not result in cardiovascular protection and may increase the risk of CHD in older post-menopausal women.88 The overall risk of CHD did not reach statistical significance after combination therapy for an average of 5.6 years, the HR for CHD was 1.24 (95% CI 1.00–1.54). Similarly, the WHI findings show that conjugated equine oestrogen monotherapy provides no protection against myocardial infarction or coronary death in older post-menopausal women with prior hysterectomy during a 6.8-year period of use (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.70–1.16).89 There was a trend towards a lower risk among women aged 50–59 (i.e. peri-menopausal) at baseline (HR 0.63) (95% CI 0.36–1.09); however, this trend was not statistically significant.90
It has been hypothesized that the length of time since the menopause may be a better predictor of the cardiovascular risk of hormone therapy than the recipient's age. Since a recent analysis of the observational Nurses' Health Study showed that the relative risk of myocardial infarction was not increased in women who started hormone therapy within 10 years of the menopause.91 The WHI also demonstrated that there was an increased risk of venous thrombosis associated with oestrogen plus progestin therapy that again was greater with age92 and an increase in the risk of ischaemic stroke that amounted to about eight events per 10 000 women treated.93
To explore the ‘younger woman effect’, a recent secondary analysis of both randomized trials (oestrogen plus progestin and oestrogen alone) of the WHI study was performed. The question of whether the effects of hormone therapy on risks of cardiovascular disease vary by age or years since menopause was addressed. The analysis suggested that women who initiated hormone therapy closer to the menopause tended to have a reduced CHD risk compared with the increase in CHD risk among women more distant from the menopause. This trend, however, again did not achieve statistical significance.94 It can be concluded that continuous equine oestrogen alone appears to be associated with a lower risk of CHD than continuous equine oestrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate. CHD tended to be non-significantly reduced by hormone therapy in younger women or in women less than 10 years since menopause.94
The effect of hormone therapy in women with established coronary disease was assessed in the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) clinical trial. This study failed to demonstrate any cardioprotective benefit of hormone replacement therapy in elderly women with proven coronary artery disease.95 The HERS study was the first large randomized clinical trial of hormone therapy and cardiovascular outcomes. Almost 3000 women with proven CHD were randomly assigned to a hormone therapy (PremproTM) commonly used in the USA containing 0.625 mg of conjugated equine oestrogens and 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate or placebo. After 4 years, the frequency of the primary outcome, namely fatal and non-fatal heart disease combined, did not differ between the two groups. There was also a 50% excess of coronary events in the first year in the hormone group, suggesting early coronary harm with this form of hormone therapy in this group of patients with documented heart disease.
It is important to point out that the clinical trial data of CHD outcomes are limited to only a few hormone therapy regimens and doses. The possibility that different oestrogens and progestins at different doses and routes of administration may have different cardiovascular outcomes remains to be tested.
Practice point 6. Cardiovascular risk associated with hormone therapy exceeds the benefit in elderly post-menopausal women; hence, hormone therapy should not be used for the primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in older women. In treating the younger, peri-menopausal woman for menopausal symptoms, the benefits should be weighed against the potential risks of hormone replacement therapy.
|
Quantifying cardiovascular risk in the peri-menopausal woman |
|---|
Identification of risk factors is crucial before embarking on hormone replacement therapy and, thereafter, patients should be regularly monitored to identify the emergence of any cardiovascular risk factors. Unfortunately, women are less likely than men to identify risk factors and to participate in screening programmes.96
All peri-menopausal women seeking medical help for menopausal symptoms should be regularly assessed for the risk of developing cardiovascular disease and for the risk of complications in the presence of existing disease. In particular, measurement of blood pressure following practice guidelines should be performed at each consultation.97 All patients should be evaluated for the presence of central obesity, dyslipidaemia, fasting hyperglycaemia, or impaired glucose tolerance. A detailed personal history should be recorded, covering gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertension, alcohol intake and smoking, as well as a family history of cardiovascular disease.
The SCORE charts provide a means of determining the risk of dying of cardiovascular disease in the next 10 years (Figure 1).98 The system is derived from data from 12 European Cohort studies that involved 93 298 women and considers systolic blood pressure and serum cholesterol in relation to age in establishing absolute risk in either high- or low-risk European countries. The alternative Framingham score, which is based on US epidemiology, may overestimate risk in European populations. Because of the lag time for cardiovascular event rates in women, particularly fatal cardiovascular events as measured by SCORE, to catch up with those of men after the menopause, the absolute estimated rate of risk for a peri-menopausal or an early post-menopausal woman may be deceptively low. A low estimate of absolute risk of fatal events over 10 years may disguise large increases in relative risk. To avoid such problems, the SCORE card may be used to estimate the risk projected to age 60 years in patients with an unhealthy risk profile but with a low absolute level of risk. Also, unfortunately, the SCORE system may underestimate the risk in patients with low HDL, raised triglycerides, impaired glucose tolerance, and raised levels of inflammation, all features of the metabolic syndrome which is a major component of cardiovascular risk in post-menopausal women and does not take account of diabetes, which is relatively more important as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in women than in men.52
|
Evaluation of angina, using exercise testing, stress echocardiography, or scintigraphy, and angiography when considered appropriate, also is of utmost importance in the peri-menopausal woman with chest pain as they are powerful predictors of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction.99 In older women (>75 years), the presence of test-positive angina is associated with a similar, or even higher, absolute mortality than in men.100
Practice point 7. Every opportunity should be taken when managing a menopausal woman to identify the extent of her cardiovascular risk.
|
Modifying cardiovascular risk factors |
|---|
Increasing physical activity, stopping smoking, and maintaining moderate alcohol consumption are recommended in the 2003 European Society of Hypertension–European Society of Cardiology guidelines.101 Such measures should be instigated in all patients with high normal blood pressure. Women with stage 1 hypertension usually require pharmacological intervention for hypertension, but lifestyle changes are also important. Changes in diet can also have a favourable effect on dyslipidaemia.47
Establishing lifestyle changes is difficult for many women. Counselling on the benefits of exercise, enrolment to a smoking cessation programme and/or an alcohol awareness programme may help, but it may prove difficult to maintain these changes. Many women will require pharmacological intervention with the use of antihypertensives to reduce blood pressure and statins to improve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol profiles, but statins have only a moderate beneficial effect on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.102 Careful prescribing of drugs for intensive antihypertensive therapy provides a cost-effective strategy in terms of per event prevented in patients at 10% risk of a coronary event over 5 years.103 Hormone replacement therapy should not be regarded as a means of preventing CHD and should not be started for this purpose.
Practice point 8. Lifestyle changes and pharmacological intervention should be introduced in peri-menopausal women to minimize cardiovascular risk.
|
Significance of hypertension in peri-menopausal women |
|---|
In the adult population, hypertension is the most prevalent chronic disorder and is due to essential hypertension in 95% of cases. At the age of 60 years, over 80% of women are hypertensive.104 In addition to increasing the risk of CHD and stroke, hypertension can lead to vascular damage within the kidneys that eventually results in end-stage renal disease.
Blood pressure, if measured carefully, is still one of the most powerful and accurate determinants of cardiovascular status and risk.105 Despite its importance, hypertension often goes undiagnosed. Many physicians do not routinely measure blood pressure, and those who do may not be able to measure blood pressure to within ± 3 mmHg because of sphygmomanometer faults.106 Even if high blood pressure is detected using correct procedures and using regularly serviced equipment, the condition frequently goes untreated, with reliance on patients making lifestyle changes, or is insufficiently managed using antihypertensive agents of different therapeutic classes,36 with disregard to the treatment guidelines.101 Although hypertension is defined as a systolic/diastolic blood pressure of 140/90 mmHg, it must be appreciated that target-organ damage extends to blood pressures below these values. Therefore, more rigorous control of blood pressure may be appropriate, particularly in the presence of additional risk factors and concomitant disease.
Treatment guidelines are based on evidence gained from large randomized trials, using endpoints of clinical relevance such as a cardiovascular event or stroke. The benefits of antihypertensive therapy come from data obtained from women showing that effective treatment reduces the risk of stroke by 38% and of CHD by 19%.107
The European Society of Hypertension–European Society of Cardiology guidelines recognize that the risk of target-organ damage extends to blood pressures well below 140/90 mmHg, and the true threshold for cardiovascular risk should be flexible and dependent on the total risk for each individual (Table 5).101 Current guidelines have defined five levels of blood pressure. Within the so-called ‘normal’ (120–129/80–84 mmHg) and ‘high-normal’ (130–139/85–89 mmHg) categories, the cumulative incidence of cardiovascular events is higher than that observed in individuals with optimal blood pressure control (<120/80 mmHg).108
|
Some reduction in blood pressure is achievable in patients with high-normal blood pressure by lifestyle interventions,109 but these measures may prove insufficient to achieve optimal or even normal levels. Recently, it has been shown that pharmacological treatment of high-normal hypertension using an angiotensin II receptor blocker reduces the risk of incident hypertension.110
Practice point 9. The peri-menopausal woman is increasingly likely to become hypertensive and will require blood pressure-lowering measures to reduce the incidence of target-organ damage. Even slightly elevated blood pressure poses a risk and should be addressed.
|
Peri-menopausal hypertension in cardiovascular risk |
|---|
In addition to factors comprising the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes, various mechanisms at the molecular level have been proposed as playing a role in the increase in hypertension occurring in women at the time of the menopause.111 Oxidative stress, endothelin levels, sympathetic nervous system activity, and plasma renin activity are increased. The resultant endothelial dysfunction leads to changes in vasomotor tone, arterial stiffness, arterial remodeling, and inflammation, which contribute to atherosclerosis and target-organ damage.112
The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a central role in regulating sodium balance, fluid volume, and blood pressure.113 Chronic long-term inhibition of the RAAS using angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, as well as lowering blood pressure, may prevent most of the deleterious effects due to ageing within the cardiovascular system.114 Aldosterone, independent of angiotensin II, has also been implicated in cardiovascular disease.115 Blockade of the aldosterone receptor prevents sodium and water retention, with the control of blood pressure, and may prevent vascular injury and fibrosis, arrhythmias, and cardiac fibrosis.116 The aldosterone receptor antagonist spironolactone has been shown to reduce the risk of morbidity and death in patients with heart failure.117 Similar benefits have been shown with the aldosterone receptor antagonist eplerenone in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and congestive heart failure following myocardial infarction.118 It has also been shown that one synthetic progestin, drospirenone, is an aldosterone receptor antagonist with antimineralocorticoid activity.119 When combined with oestradiol as a hormone therapy for use in the peri-menopausal woman, it has been shown to have antihypertensive activity, a unique action. Further blood pressure reduction can be achieved in hypertensive post-menopausal women already treated with the angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor enalapril.120–122 This blood pressure lowering action of drospirenone has also shown in women with diabetes.120 Drospirenone, however, has no effect on blood pressure in normotensive women.123 It should be emphasized that hormone therapy containing drosperinone should not be used solely as an antihypertensive. However, it may be the hormone therapy of choice in hypertensive post-menopausal women who require hormone therapy for the treatment of menopausal symptoms.
Practice point 10. The RAAS plays a major role in the control of blood pressure, with both angiotensin II and aldosterone contributing to ensuing target-organ damage.
|
Control of menopausal hypertension |
|---|
The probability that blood pressure will increase with hormone replacement therapy in menopausal hypertensive women is low.124 However, most of these women will require antihypertensive therapy to achieve target blood pressures. Although reduction of blood pressure per se is important,101 the type of antihypertensive used may have to be considered.
In the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial–Blood Pressure Lowering Arm, the amlodipine/perindopril-based therapy was superior to that based on atenolol/diuretic therapy in women than it was in men.125 However, in common with many other clinical trials, the number of men was disproportionately high at 77%. Attitudes to the use of beta-blockers in hypertension have changed recently, and they are now mainly indicated after myocardial infarction and in cases of tachyarrhythmia rather than hypertension. Their use should be avoided in women with increased risk for metabolic syndrome and especially in the presence of type 2 diabetes.126
Because of excessive RAAS activity at the time of the menopause,127 angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers may be particularly appropriate. These are the agents of choice in hypertensive individuals with diabetes, and they may prevent or delay the onset of diabetes in non-diabetic subjects.128 Angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors, however, may be associated with a high incidence of severe non-productive cough that some patients find intolerable.129 Switching to an angiotensin receptor blocker may alleviate this problem.
Practice point 11. Treatment of hypertension with angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers may be particularly appropriate.
|
Control of menopausal dyslipidaemia |
|---|
The NCEP-ATPIII has issued comprehensive guidelines for the interpretation of lipid abnormalities and the follow-up and treatment of patients with dyslipidaemia.47 These guidelines do not advocate any difference in the treatment of men and women. Lifestyle changes can be helpful, but most patients will require pharmacological interventions, with statins being considered the treatment of choice. The primary lipid goal for the prevention of atherosclerotic vascular disease is to achieve a normal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of <130 mg/dL by diet in normal individuals. The use of diet and/or statin therapy may be required in menopausal women according to the degree of risk. Recent data from the Heart Protection Study (HPS) suggest that even patients with low baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol may obtain cardiovascular benefit from statin therapy.130 Simvastatin, the statin used in HPS, did not have any beneficial effect on non-cardiac events such as dementia or osteoporotic fractures.
Practice point 12. Statins should be first-line therapy in preventive strategies for lipid lowering, the goal being those recommended by the NCEP-ATPIII.
|
Suggested roles and responsibilities of the gynaecologist and the cardiovascular physician in managing peri-menopausal patients |
|---|
An aggressive approach to the identification and management of all cardiovascular risk factors is essential in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Gynaecologists should call upon the expertise of the cardiovascular physician to control blood pressure, dyslipidaemia, and other metabolic parameters contributing to increased cardiovascular risk. Gynaecologists should also refer any female patient with suspected cardiovascular disease to a cardiovascular physician or an internist. In particular, gynaecologists should be vigilant to the possibility of angina.12 Women have tended to be less likely to be referred for diagnostic tests until advanced disease, less likely to receive secondary prevention and less likely to be revascularized.131 This attitude should be actively addressed.
Hormone therapy should be discussed taking into account the prevalence and the relevance of the patient's symptoms and risk factors. Each patient must be counselled regarding the current data on the risks and perceived benefits of the therapy, so that she can make appropriate informed individual decisions about continuing or stopping treatment. Such discussions could be part of the annual risk–benefit analysis undertaken in each patient and in the context of timely mammographic and genital cancer studies. At every consultation, patients should also be closely monitored for the presence of cardiovascular risk factors and the emergence of metabolic syndrome and should be given advice on the importance of lifestyle modification.
Practice point 13. In the management of the peri-menopausal women, the cardiologist and gynaecologist should work together to assess and control cardiovascular risk and to minimize vasomotor symptoms. For the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, the gynaecologist should advise patients about the importance of lifestyle modification. Cardiovascular risk factors should be aggressively managed.
Gender differences in responses to cardiovascular treatment
Women have been under-represented in clinical trials; more gender-specific data are required on the efficacy and safety of cardiovascular medication. Most of our knowledge of the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease comes from studies in men, yet cardiac size and changes in left ventricular mass in response to age and hypertrophic stimuli exist between the sexes.132 An understanding of the gender differences in cardiovascular disease is crucial for the management of female patients and for the development of new gender-specific diagnostic options.133
Although there is evidence of gender differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics,57 the efficacy and safety of drugs are frequently evaluated in men and the results extrapolated to women. In clinical trials conducted in the 1980s and 1990s, women were poorly represented: although they make up about 55% of the world's population, no more than one-quarter of the subjects evaluated were women. In more recent trials, this issue has been partially addressed by increasing the proportion of women enrolled, but the situation is still not ideal. There remains a need for clinical trials conducted exclusively in women or for trials that enrol sufficient women to allow a pre-specified gender analysis.4 Among women, but not men, with heart failure and depressed left ventricular systolic function, digoxin is associated with an increased risk of death from any cause.134 Aspirin reduced the risk of a composite of cardiovascular events due to its effect on reducing the risk of ischaemic stroke in women and myocardial infarction in men.135
|
Conclusions |
|---|
Epidemiological data have clearly established a link between the menopause and increased cardiovascular risk. Oestrogen deficiency, which is responsible for the vasomotor and urogenital symptoms and osteoporosis in menopausal women, is also responsible for changes in metabolism and physiology to a more android pattern. Hormone replacement therapy, using an oestrogen or oestrogen plus progestin combination, helps alleviate the menopausal symptoms but cannot be recommended for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular events can be reduced by the management of risk factors. Particularly important is the control of hypertension, lipids, and other factors contributing to the metabolic syndrome. The management of the peri-menopausal woman is not the exclusive responsibility of the gynaecologist. An interdisciplinary approach should be adopted by the gynaecologist not just evaluating vasomotor and urogenital symptoms, but also assessing the patient for cardiovascular risk, and cardiovascular physician helping in the aggressive treatment of women at increased risk of cardiovascular disease.
|
Acknowledgements |
|---|
The authors would like to thank all the participants of the Educational and Training Programme which took place at The European Heart House, Sophia Antipolis, Nice on 12th and 13th May 2006 for their stimulating discussions which helped to form the basis of this consensus paper.
Conflict of interest: P.C. reports having served as a consultant to Eli Lilly, Berlex, Merck, Pantharei and Pfizer, paid lecture fees by Berlex, Merck, Pfizer, Novo Nordisk and Organon, grant support from Eli Lilly, Organon and Merck. J.S. has been sponsored by pharmaceutical companies to speak publicly about HRT—both for and against. J.S. received grants from pharmaceutical companies that have, and have not, HRT products, and from non-commercial sources, research councils and charities, to conduct HRT research.
|
References |
|---|
- Mosca L, Jones WK, King KB, Ouyang P, Redberg RF, Hill MN. Awareness, perception, and knowledge of heart disease risk and prevention among women in the United States. American Heart Association Women's Heart Disease and Stroke Campaign Task Force. Arch Fam Med (2000) 9:506–515.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Weisz D, Gusmano MK, Rodwin VG. Gender and the treatment of heart disease in older persons in the United States, France, and England: a comparative, population-based view of a clinical phenomenon. Gend Med (2004) 1:29–40.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Peterson S, Peto V, Rayner M, Luengo-Fernandez R, Gray A. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics (2005) 2nd ed. London: British Heart Foundation.
- Stramba-Badiale M, Fox KM, Priori SG, Collins P, Daly C, Graham I, Jonsson B, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Tendera M. Cardiovascular diseases in women: a statement from the policy conference of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J (2006) 27:994–1005.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Benagiano G, Farris M. Why a consensus conference on hormone replacement therapy and the cardiovascular system? Maturitas (2004) 47:245–253.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Naftolin F, Schneider HP, Sturdee DW, Birkhauser M, Brincat MP, Gambacciani M, Genazzani AR, Limpaphayom KK, O'Neill S, Palacios S, Pines A, Siseles N, Tan D, Burger HG, Executive Committee of the International Menopause Society. Guidelines for hormone treatment of women in the menopausal transition and beyond. Climacteric (2004) 7:333–337.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Ouyang P, Michos ED, Karas RH. Hormone replacement therapy and the cardiovascular system: Lessons learned and unanswered questions. J Am Coll Cardiol (2006) 47:1741–1753.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Unal B, Critchley JA, Capewell S. Explaining the decline in coronary heart disease mortality in England and Wales between 1981 and 2000. Circulation (2004) 109:1101–1107.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Mahonen M, Tolonen H, Ruokokoski E, Amouyel P. Contribution of trends in survival and coronary-event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10-year results from 37 WHO MONICA project populations. Monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease. Lancet (1999) 353:1547–1557.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Simon T, Mary-Krause M, Cambou JP, Hanania G, Gueret P, Lablanche JM, Blanchard D, Genes N, Danchin N, USIC Investigators. Impact of age and gender on in-hospital and late mortality after acute myocardial infarction: increased early risk in younger women: results from the French nation-wide USIC registries. Eur Heart J (2006) 27:1282–1288.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Simon T, Mary-Krause M, Funck-Brentano C, Jaillon P. Sex differences in the prognosis of congestive heart failure: results from the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS II). Circulation (2001) 103:375–380.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Reunanen A, Suhonen O, Aromaa A, Knekt P, Pyorala K. Incidence of different manifestations of coronary heart disease in middle-aged Finnish men and women. Acta Med Scand (1985) 218:19–26.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Lerner DJ, Kannel WB. Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J (1986) 111:383–390.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Bugiardini R, Bairey Merz CN. Angina with ‘normal’ coronary arteries: a changing philosophy. JAMA (2005) 293:477–484.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Senoz S, Direm B, Gulekli B, Gokmen O. Estrogen deprivation, rather than age, is responsible for the poor lipid profile and carbohydrate metabolism in women. Maturitas (1996) 25:107–114.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet (2005) 365:217–223.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet (2002) 360:1903–1913.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Women and smoking: a report of the Surgeon General. Executive summary. MMWR Recomm Rep (2002) 51:i–iv.[Medline]
- Prescott E, Hippe M, Schnohr P, Hein HO, Vestbo J. Smoking and risk of myocardial infarction in women and men: longitudinal population study. BMJ (1998) 316:1043–1047.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Castelli WP. Cardiovascular disease: pathogenesis, epidemiology, and risk among users of oral contraceptives who smoke. Am J Obstet Gynecol (1999) 180:S349–S356.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Goldbaum GM, Kendrick JS, Hogelin GC, Gentry EM. The relative impact of smoking and oral contraceptive use on women in the United States. JAMA (1987) 258:1339–1342.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Rangemark C, Benthin G, Granstrom EF, Persson L, Winell S, Wennmalm A. Tobacco use and urinary excretion of thromboxane A2 and prostacyclin metabolites in women stratified by age. Circulation (1992) 86:1495–1500.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Dotevall A, Rangeark C, Erikssib E, Kutti J, Wadenvik H, Wennmalm A. Cigarette smoking increases thromboxane A2 formation without affecting platelet survival in young healthy females. Thromb Haemost (1992) 68:583–588.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Kalra VK, Ying Y, Deemer K, Natarajan R, Nadler JL, Coates TD. Mechanism of cigarette smoke condensate induced adhesion of human monocytes in cultured endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol (1994) 160:154–162.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Fruzzetti F, Ricci C, Fioretti P. Haemostasis profile in smoking and nonsmoking women taking low-dose oral contraceptives. Contraception (1994) 49:579–592.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- WHO Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease, Steroid Hormone Contraception. Acute myocardial infarction and combined oral contraceptives: results of an international multicentre case-control study. Lancet (1997) 349:1202–1209.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Keeling D. Combined oral contraceptives and the risk of myocardial infarction. Ann Med (2003) 35:413–418.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M. Risk of myocardial infarction, angina and stroke in users of oral contraceptives, an updated analysis of a cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol (1998) 105:890–896.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Jonsdottir LS, Sigfusson N, Gudnason V, Sigvaldason H, Thorgeirsson G. Do lipids, blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking confer equal risk of myocardial infarction in women as in men? The Reykjavik Study. J Cardiovasc Risk (2002) 9:67–76.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch-Johnsen K, Brotons C, Cifkova R, Dallongeville J, Ebrahim S, Faergeman O, Graham I, Mancia G, Manger Cats V, Orth-Gomer K, Perk J, Pyorala K, Rodicio JL, Sans S, Sansoy V, Sechtem U, Silber S, Thomsen T, Wood D, Third Joint Task Force of European, Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Third Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Eur Heart J (2003) 24:1601–1610.
[Free Full Text] - Barter P, Kastelein J, Nunn A, Hobbs R, Future Forum Editorial Board. High density lipoproteins (HDLs) and atherosclerosis; the unanswered questions. Atherosclerosis (2003) 168:195–211.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Forouhi NG, Merrick D, Goyder E, Ferguson BA, Abbas J, Lachowycz K, Wild SH. Diabetes prevalence in England, 2001—estimates from an epidemiological model. Diabet Med (2006) 23:189–197.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Ding EL, Song Y, Malik vs, Liu S. Sex differences of endogenous sex hormones and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA (2006) 295:1288–1299.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Lobner K, Knopff A, Baumgarten A, Mollenhauer U, Marienfeld S, Garrido-Franco M, Bonifacio E, Ziegler AG. Predictors of postpartum diabetes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes (2006) 55:792–797.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - World Health Organization. Prevention of diabetes. Report of the WHO study group. In: Technical Series 844 (2004) Geneva: WHO.
- DECODE Study Group, European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Is the current definition for diabetes relevant to mortality risk from all causes and cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diseases? Diabetes Care (2003) 26:688–696.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Hasdai D, Porter A, Rosengren A, Behar S, Boyko V, Battler A. Effect of gender on outcomes of acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol (2003) 91:1466–1469.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- EUROASPIRE I, II Group. European Action on Secondary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events. Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries. Lancet (2001) 357:995–1001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Kanaya AM, Grady D, Barrett-Connor E. Explaining the sex difference in coronary heart disease mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med (2002) 162:1737–1745.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Sprafka JM, Burke GL, Folsom AR, McGovern PG, Hahn LP. Trends in prevalence of diabetes mellitus in patients with myocardial infarction and effect of diabetes on survival. The Minnesota Heart Survey. Diabetes Care (1991) 14:537–543.[Abstract]
- Huxley R, Barzi F, Woodward M. Excess risk of fatal coronary heart disease associated with diabetes in men and women: meta-analysis of 37 prospective cohort studies. BMJ (2006) 332:73–78.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Pyorala K, Lehto S, De Bacquer D, De Sutter J, Sans S, Keil U, Wood D, De Backer G, EUROASPIRE I Group; EUROASPIRE II Group. Risk factor management in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with coronary heart disease. Findings from the EUROASPIRE I AND II surveys. Diabetologia (2004) 47:1257–1265.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Guthrie JR, Dennerstein L, Taffe JR, Lehert P, Burger HG. The menopausal transition: a 9-year prospective population-based study. The Melbourne Women's Midlife Health Project. Climacteric (2004) 7:375–389.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Hu FB, Willett WC, Li T, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Manson JE. Adiposity as compared with physical activity in predicting mortality among women. N Engl J Med (2004) 351:2694–2703.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. Metabolic syndrome – a new world-wide definition. A Consensus Statement from the International Diabetes Federation. Diabet Med (2006) 23:469–480.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Grundy SM, Brewer HB Jr, Cleeman JI, Smith SC Jr, Lenfant C. Definition of metabolic syndrome: Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association conference on scientific issues related to definition. Circulation (2004) 109:433–438.
[Free Full Text] - National Cholesterol Education Program. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Final Report. Circulation (2002) 106:3143–3421.
[Free Full Text] - Assmann G, Cullen P, Schulte H. The Munster Heart Study (PROCAM). Results of follow-up at 8 years. Eur Heart J (1998) 19(Suppl. A):A2–A11.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Kaaja RJ, Poyhonen-Alho MK. Insulin resistance and sympathetic overactivity in women. J Hypertens (2006) 24:131–141.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Kaaja R, Laivuori H, Pulkki P, Tikkanen MJ, Hiilesmaa V, Ylikorkala O. Is there any link between insulin resistance and inflammation in established preeclampsia? Metabolism (2004) 53:1433–1435.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Haukkamaa L, Salminen M, Laivuori H, Leinonen H, Hiilesmaa V, Kaaja R. Risk for subsequent coronary artery disease after preeclampsia. Am J Cardiol (2004) 93:805–808.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Bernstein MS, Morabia A, Sloutkis D. Definition and prevalence of sedentarism in an urban population. Am J Public Health (1999) 89:862–867.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Castelo-Branco C, Blumel JE, Roncagliolo ME, Haya J, Bolf D, Binfa L, Tacia X, Colodron M. Age, menopause and hormone replacement therapy influences on cardiovascular risk factors in a cohort of middle-aged Chilean women. Maturitas (2003) 45:205–212.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Lukkarinen H, Hentinen M. Assessment of quality of life with the Nottingham Health Profile among women with coronary heart disease. Heart Lung (1998) 27:189–199.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Barford A, Dorling D, Davey-Smith G, Shaw M. Life expectancy: women now on top everywhere. BMJ (2006) 332:808.
[Free Full Text] - United Nations. Population aging. (1999) wwww.un.org/esa/population/publications/aging99.
- Anderson GD. Sex and racial differences in pharmacological response: where is the evidence? Pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. J Womens Health (Larchmt) (2005) 14:19–29.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Burger HG, Dudley EC, Robertson DM, Dennerstein L. Hormonal changes in the menopause transition. Recent Prog Horm Res (2002) 57:257–275.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Buckler H. The menopause transition: endocrine changes and clinical symptoms. J Br Menopause Soc (2005) 11:61–65.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Zichella L. Clinical management of the menopausal woman. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud (1993) 38(Suppl. 1):15–22.[Medline]
- Baum LW. Sex, hormones, and Alzheimer's disease. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci (2005) 60:736–743.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Oldenhave A, Jaszmann LJ, Haspels AA, Everaerd WT. Impact of climacteric on well-being. A survey based on 5213 women 39 to 60 years old. Am J Obstet Gynecol (1993) 168:772–780.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Kronenberg F. Hot flushes: phenomenology, quality of life, and search for treatment options. Exp Gerontol (1994) 29:319–336.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Barnabei VM, Grady D, Stovall DW, Cauley JA, Lin F, Stuenkel CA, Stefanick ML, Pickar JH. Menopausal symptoms in older women and the effects of treatment with hormone therapy. Obstet Gynecol (2002) 100:1209–1218.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Schurmann R, Holler T, Benda N. Estradiol and drospirenone for climacteric symptoms in postmenopausal women: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of three dose regimens. Climacteric (2004) 7:189–196.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Nelson HD, Vesco KK, Haney E, Fu R, Nedrow A, Miller J, Nicolaidis C, Walker M, Humphrey L. Nonhormonal therapies for menopausal hot flashes: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA (2006) 295:2057–2071.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Vanwesenbeeck I, Vennix P, van de Wiel H. ‘Menopausal symptoms’: associations with menopausal status and psychosocial factors. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol (2001) 22:149–158.[Medline]
- Derman RJ, Dawood MY, Stone S. Quality of life during sequential hormone replacement therapy—a placebo-controlled study. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud (1995) 40:73–78.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Col NF, Weber G, Stiggelbout A, Chuo J, D'Agostino R, Corso P. Short-term menopausal hormone therapy for symptom relief: an updated decision model. Arch Intern Med (2004) 164:1634–1640.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Badia X, Diez-Perez A, Lahoz R, Lizan L, Nogues X, Iborra J. The ECOS-16 questionnaire for the evaluation of health related quality of life in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis. Health Qual Life Outcomes (2004) 2:41.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC, Kotchen JM, Ockene J, Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2002) 288:321–333.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Kannel WB, Hjortland MC, McNamara PM, Gordon T. Menopause and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Framingham study. Ann Intern Med (1976) 85:447–452.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Gambacciani M, Ciaponi M, Cappagli B, De Simone L, Orlandi R, Genazzani AR. Prospective evaluation of body weight and body fat distribution in early postmenopausal women with and without hormonal replacement therapy. Maturitas (2001) 39:125–132.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Ferrannini E. Physiological and metabolic consequences of obesity. Metabolism (1995) 44:15–17.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Matthews KA, Meilahn E, Kuller LH, Kelsey SF, Caggiula AW, Wing RR. Menopause and risk factors for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med (1989) 321:698–699.
- Staessen JA, Li Y, Thijs L, Wang JG. Blood pressure reduction and cardiovascular prevention: an update including the 2003–2004 secondary prevention trials. Hypertens Res (2005) 28:385–407.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Lindheim SR, Buchanan TA, Duffy DM, Vijod MA, Kojima T, Stanczyk FZ, Lobo RA. Comparison of estimates of insulin sensitivity in pre- and postmenopausal women using the insulin tolerance test and the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. J Soc Gynecol Investig (1994) 1:150–154.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Samsioe G. HRT and cardiovascular disease. Ann NY Acad Sci (2003) 997:358–372.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Eilertsen AL, Hoibraaten E, Os I, Andersen TO, Sándwich L, Sandset PM. The effects of oral and transdermal hormone replacement therapy on C-reactive protein levels and other inflammatory markers in women with high risk of thrombosis. Maturitas (2005) 52:111–118.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Chlebowski RT, Hendrix SL, Langer RD, Stefanick ML, Gass M, Lane D, Rodabough RJ, Gilligan MA, Cyr MG, Thomson CA, Khandekar J, Petrovitch H, McTiernan A. Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial. JAMA (2003) 289:3243–3253.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Kuhl H. Breast cancer risk in the WHI study: the problem of obesity. Maturitas (2005) 51:83–97.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Stefanick ML, Anderson GL, Margolis KL, Hendrix SL, Rodabough RJ, Paskett ED, Lane DS, Hubbell FA, Assaf AR, Sarto GE, Schenken RS, Yasmeen S, Lessin L, Chlebowski RT. Effects of conjugated equine estrogens on breast cancer and mammography screening in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy. JAMA (2006) 295:1647–1657.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Chen WY, Manson JE, Hankinson SE, Rosner B, Hoes MD, Willett WC, Colditz GA. Unopposed estrogen therapy and the risk of invasive breast cancer. Arch Intern Med (2006) 166:1027–1032.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Sullivan JM, El Zeky F, Vander ZR, Ramanathan KB. Effect on survival of estrogen replacement therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol (1997) 79:847–850.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Shlipak MG, Angeja BG, Go AS, Frederick PD, Canto JG, Grady D. Hormone therapy and in-hospital survival after myocardial infarction in postmenopausal women. Circulation (2001) 104:2300–2304.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Dias AR Jr, Melo RN, Gebara OC, D'Amico EA, Nussbacher A, Halbe HW, Pinotti JA. Effects of conjugated equine estrogens or raloxifene on lipid profile, coagulation and fibrinolysis factors in postmenopausal women. Climacteric (2005) 8:63–70.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Clarkson TB. Progestogens and cardiovascular disease. A critical review. J Reprod Med (1999) 44:180–184.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Manson JE, Hsia J, Johnson KC, Rossouw JE, Assaf AR, Lasser NL, Trevisan M, Black HR, Heckbert SR, Detrano R, Strickland OL, Wong ND, Crouse JR, Stein E, Cushman M, Women's Health Initiative Investigators. Estrogen plus progestin and the risk of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med (2003) 349:523–534.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Anderson GL, Limacher M, Assaf AR, Bassford T, Beresford SA, Black H, Bonds D, Brunner R, Brzyski R, Caan B, Chlebowski R, Curb D, Gass M, Hays J, Heiss G, Hendrix S, Howard BV, Hsia J, Hubbell A, Jackson R, Johnson KC, Judd H, Kotchen JM, Kuller L, LaCroix AZ, Lane D, Langer RD, Lasser N, Lewis CE, Manson J, Margolis K, Ockene J, O'Sullivan MJ, Phillips L, Prentice RL, Ritenbaugh C, Robbins J, Rossouw JE, Sarto G, Stefanick ML, Van Horn L, Wactawski-Wende J, Wallace R, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Women's Health Initiative Investigators. Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2004) 291:1701–1712.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Hsia J, Langer RD, Manson JE, Kuller L, Johnson KC, Hendrix SL, Pettinger M, Heckbert SR, Greep N, Crawford S, Eaton CB, Kostis JB, Caralis P, Prentice R, Women's Health Initiative Investigators. Conjugated equine estrogens and coronary heart disease: the Women's Health Initiative. Arch Intern Med (2006) 166:357–365.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Grodstein F, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ. Hormone therapy and coronary heart disease: the role of time since menopause and age at hormone initiation. J Womens Health (2006) 15:35–44.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Cushman M, Kuller LH, Prentice R, Rodabough RJ, Psaty BM, Stafford RS, Sidney S, Rosendaal FR, Women's Health Initiative Investigators. Estrogen plus progestin and risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA (2004) 292:1573–1580.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Wassertheil-Smoller S, Hendrix SL, Limacher M, Heiss G, Kooperberg C, Baird A, Kotchen T, Curb JD, Black H, Rossouw JE, Aragaki A, Safford M, Stein E, Laowattana S, Mysiw WJ, WHI Investigators. Effect of estrogen plus progestin on stroke in postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative: a randomized trial. JAMA (2003) 289:2673–2684.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Rossouw JE, Prentice RL, Manson JE, Wu L, Barad D, Barnabei VM, Ko M, LaCroix AZ, Margolis KL, Stefanick ML. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and risk of cardiovascular disease by age and years since menopause. JAMA (2007) 297:1465–1477.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, Furberg C, Herrington D, Riggs B, Vittinghoff E. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. JAMA (1998) 280:605–613.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Bartys S, Baker D, Lewis P, Middleton E. Inequity in recording of risk in a local population-based screening programme for cardiovascular disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil (2005) 12:63–67.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- O'Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mancia G, Mengden T, Myers M, Padfield P, Palatini P, Parati G, Pickering T, Redon J, Staessen J, Stergiou G, Verdecchia P, European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. Practice guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension for clinic, ambulatory and self blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens (2005) 23:697–701.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Conroy RM, Pyorala K, Fitzgerald AP, Sans S, Menotti A, De Backer G, De Bacquer D, Ducimetiere P, Jousilahti P, Keil U, Njolstad I, Oganov RG, Thomsen T, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Tverdal A, Wedel H, Whincup P, Wilhelmsen L, Graham IM, SCORE Project Group. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J (2003) 24:987–1003.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Marshall T. Coronary heart disease prevention: insights from modelling incremental cost effectiveness. BMJ (2003) 327:1264–1268.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - McCallum A, Shipley M, Manderbacka K, Martikainen P, Keskimaki I. Incidence and prognositic significance of stable angina pectoris among woman and men. JAMA (2006) 295:1404–1411.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Guidelines Committee. 2003 European Society of Hypertension—European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens (2003) 21:1011–1053.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Hersberger M, von Eckardstein A. Modulation of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol metabolism and reverse cholesterol transport. Handb Exp Pharmacol (2005) 170:537–561.[Medline]
- Marshall T. Coronary heart disease prevention: insights from modeling incremental cost effectiveness. BMJ (2003) 327:1264.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Hajjar I, Kotchen TA. Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988–2000. JAMA (2003) 290:199–206.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Messerli F, White WB, Staessen JA. If only cardiologists did properly measure blood pressure: blood pressure recordings in daily practice and clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol (2002) 40:2201–2003.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Coleman AJ, Steel SD, Ashworth M, Vowler SL, Shennan A. Accuracy of the pressure scale of sphygmomanometers in clinical use within primary care. Blood Press Monit (2005) 10:181–188.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- MacMahon S, Rodgers A. Blood pressure, antihypertensive treatment and stroke risk. J Hypertens (1994) 12(Suppl.):S5–S14.[Web of Science]
- Vasan RS, Larson MG, Leip EP, Evans JC, O'Donnell CJ, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of high-normal blood pressure on the risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med (2001) 345:1291–1297.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Svetkey LP. Management of prehypertension. Hypertension (2005) 45:1056–1061.
[Free Full Text] - Julius S, Nesbitt SD, Egan BM, Weber MA, Michelson EL, Kaciroti N, Black HR, Grimm RH Jr, Messerli FH, Oparil S, Schork MA, Trial of Preventing Hypertension (TROPHY) Study Investigators. Feasibility of treating prehypertension with an angiotensin-receptor blocker. N Engl J Med (2006) 354:1685–1697.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Reckelhoff JF, Fortepiani LA. Novel mechanisms responsible for postmenopausal hypertension. Hypertension (2004) 43:918–923.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Kass DA. Ventricular arterial stiffening: integrating the pathophysiology. Hypertension (2005) 46:185–193.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Hall JE, Guyton AC, Coleman TG, Mizelle HL, Woods LL. Regulation of arterial pressure: role of pressure natriuresis and diuresis. Fed Proc (1986) 45:2897–2903.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Basso N, Paglia N, Stella I, de Cavanagh EM, Ferder L, del Rosario Lores AM, Inserra F. Protective effect of the inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system on aging. Regul Pept (2005) 128:247–252.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Duprez D, De Buyzere M, Rietzschel ER, Clement DL. Aldosterone and vascular damage. Curr Hypertens Rep (2000) 2:327–334.[Medline]
- Struthers AD, MacDonald TM. Review of aldosterone- and angiotensin II-induced target organ damage and prevention. Cardiovasc Res (2004) 61:663–670.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, Cody R, Castaigne A, Perez A, Palensky J, Wittes J. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med (1999) 341:709–717.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med (2003) 348:1309–1321.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Krattenmacher R. Drospirenone: pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of a unique progestogen. Contraception (2000) 62:29–38.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Preston RA, Alonso A, Panzitta D, Zhang P, Karara AH. Additive effect of drospirenone/17-beta-estradiol in hypertensive postmenopausal women receiving enalapril. Am J Hypertens (2002) 15:816–822.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Preston RA, White WB, Pitt B, Bakris G, Norris PM, Hanes V. Effects of drospirenone/17-beta estradiol on blood pressure and potassium balance in hypertensive postmenopausal women. Am J Hypertens (2005) 18:797–804.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- White WB, Pitt B, Preston RA, Hanes V. Antihypertensive effects of drospirenone with 17-beta-estradiol, a novel hormone treatment in postmenopausal women with stage 1 hypertension. Circulation (2005) 112:1979–1784.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Archer DF, Thorneycroft IH, Foegh M, Hanes V, Glant MD, Bitterman P, Kempson RL. Long-term safety of drospirenone-estradiol for hormone therapy: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Menopause (2005) 12:716–727.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Mueck AO, Seeger H. Effect of hormone therapy on BP in normotensive and hypertensive postmenopausal women. Maturitas (2004) 49:189–203.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Dahlöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers DG, Caulfield M, Collins R, Kjeldsen SE, Kristinsson A, McInnes GT, Mehlsen J, Nieminen M, O'Brien E, Ostergren J, ASCOT Investigators. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial–Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT–BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2005) 366:895–906.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Holcomb SS. Selection of antihypertensive agents in patients with risk for diabetes. Curr Hypertens Rep (2005) 7:461–465.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Reckelhoff JF, Fortepiani LA. Novel mechanisms responsible for postmenopausal hypertension. Hypertension (2004) 43:918–923.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Ibrahim MM. RAS inhibition in hypertension. J Hum Hypertens (2006) 20:101–108.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Lee YJ, Chiang YF, Tsai JC. Severe nonproductive cough and cough-induced stress urinary incontinence in diabetic postmenopausal women treated with ACE inhibitor. Diabetes Care (2000) 23:427–428.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering therapy of antioxidant vitamin supplementation in a wide range of patients at increased risk of coronary heart disease death: early safety efficacy experience. Eur Heart J (1999) 20:725–741.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Daly C, Clemens F, Lopez Sendon JL, Tavazzi L, Boersma E, Danchin N, Delahaye F, Gitt A, Julian D, Mulcahy D, Ruzyllo W, Thygesen K, Verheugt F, Fox KM, Euro Heart Survey Investigators. Gender differences in the management and clinical outcome of stable angina. Circulation (2006) 113:490–498.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Hayward CS, Kelly RP, Collins P. The roles of gender, the menopause and hormone replacement on cardiovascular function. Cardiovasc Res (2000) 46:28–49.
[Free Full Text] - Stramba-Badiale M, Priori SG. Gender-specific prescription for cardiovascular diseases? Eur Heart J (2005) 26:1571–1572.
[Free Full Text] - Rathore SS, Wang Y, Krumholz HM. Sex-based differences in the effect of digoxin for the treatment of heart failure. N Engl J Med (2002) 347:1403–1411.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Berger JS, Roncaglioni MC, Avanzini F, Pangrazzi I, Tognoni G, Brown DL. Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in women and men: a sex-specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA (2006) 295:306–613.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. S. Ferket, E. B. Colkesen, J. J. Visser, S. Spronk, R. A. Kraaijenhagen, E. W. Steyerberg, and M. G. M. Hunink Systematic Review of Guidelines on Cardiovascular Risk Assessment: Which Recommendations Should Clinicians Follow for a Cardiovascular Health Check? Arch Intern Med, January 11, 2010; 170(1): 27 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. P. Nolan, S. M. Barry-Bianchi, A. E. Mechetiuc, and M. H. Chen Sex-based differences in the association between duration of type 2 diabetes and heart rate variability Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, October 1, 2009; 6(4): 276 - 282. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Barton and M. R. Meyer Postmenopausal Hypertension: Mechanisms and Therapy Hypertension, July 1, 2009; 54(1): 11 - 18. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Matyal Newly Appreciated Pathophysiology of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women Mandates Changes in Perioperative Management: A Core Review Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2008; 107(1): 37 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||